The Speech that changed your world!
Why? Because it was nothing but lies gathered and manipulated to convince you to follow, when you were hurting the most, when you were vulernable..
Well.. NOW YOUR NOT VULNERABLE!
After all the 100,000’s of innocent people that have been slaughtered or tortured, Kidnapped, maimed based on the below statements..
I think its fair enough, to ask for the proof, and the intelligence behind your these assertions.. Dont you?
I mean.. Cant have the world thinking we walked half way round the globe, invaded occupied and murdered a nation.. Based on guesses or even lies can
Especially after our intelligence ‘supposedly’ failed so badly as to allow these terrorists to hit us…
Personally I think its all starting to appear rather convenient your FBI were ordered ‘mysteriously’ not to pursue known terrorists, when a plot
was KNOWN to be in the making.. Especially if you wanted to make some money by invading a similar race’s country.. When obviously you were coming up
short on legitimate reasons to do as such.
Please also take note, how many times the reason of ‘freeing or liberating’ the people comes up in this speech.
- GwBush 2002
“Tonight I want to take a few minutes to discuss a grave threat to peace, and America's determination to lead the world in confronting that
Probably Should read…
“To discuss that grave threat OF Peace , and Americas determination to TOTALLY RUIN THAT CONCEPT , FOR CORPORATE PROFITS
“as a condition for ending the Persian Gulf War, the Iraqi regime was required to destroy its weapons of mass destruction, to cease all
development of such weapons, and to stop all support for terrorist groups. The Iraqi regime has violated all of those obligations”
That sounds reasonable, Mr. President.. Can you please present to me the proof you have for such a bold accusation? I mean, if you’re planning to go
to war over this, id expect you to have proof, solid proof after all…..
If we know Saddam Hussein has dangerous weapons today – and we do
Ok, so again, please present to me the proof on how you KNOW
We know that the regime has produced thousands of tons of chemical agents, including mustard gas, sarin nerve gas, VX nerve gas
Boy MR President, you’ve got some homework to do now, Again please present to me, the proof you have of making such accusations against a country
that had nothing to do with sept11?
And surveillance photos reveal that the regime is rebuilding facilities that it had used to produce chemical and biological weapons.
So one second he IS producing these dangerous weapons.. the next he is building the facilities that ENABLE him to make these weapons?.. .what came
first the chicken or the egg Mr president?
Or better yet, the plan to invade Iraq, or sept11?
“We've also discovered through intelligence that Iraq has a growing fleet of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles that could be used to disperse
chemical or biological weapons across broad areas”
Please MR president, show me the intelligence gained to suggest such an accusation!
Iraq has provided safe haven to terrorists such as Abu Nidal
who killed 12 Americans
So what about Osama and Alqaeda, they killed 3000 American citizens.. Don’t you feel compelled to get him FIRST?
Iraq could decide on any given day to provide a biological or chemical weapon to a terrorist group or individual terrorists.
You are correct Mr President…
But.. he has to HAVE these chemicals in the beginning to give them away..
We've experienced the horror of September the 11th
Spot on MR president. How convenient.. The HORROR of this day, has given you the emotional clout needed to convince your public to militarily invade
your chosen nemesis.
And look where it has gotten you.
More of your own people have died in your illegial war, than sept11.
Yet you say your winning?
the Iraqi regime has an opportunity to avoid conflict
America hopes the regime will make that choice. Unfortunately, at least so far, we have little reason to expect it.
So, if they choose not to have WMD’s… you will not militarily invade?
Well, seems they cant prove something they no longer have can they..
Obviously them opening up their country, allowing inspections and declaring there are NO WMD’s WASN’T enough was it.
So Mr President.. what exactly would have been sufficient for you not to invade?
Some worry that a change of leadership in Iraq could create instability and make the situation worse. The situation could hardly get worse,
for world security and for the people of Iraq. The lives of Iraqi citizens would improve dramatically if Saddam Hussein were no longer in
These people whom worried about instability.. would you mind naming them?
They wouldn’t happen to be the people currently stating they advised you of civil war would it?
How shameful that a US President would use the countries most horrific domestic incident for his own purposes…
Is a president that ALLOWS the most horrific event to take place, just so he CAN pursue his personal ambitions?
Rubbish you say, bollucks you scream.
An elected American president would never be so heartless, so hate filled to allow the murder of his own citizens, just so he can go off and
‘legally’ murder other citizens..
Well that’s for you to decide.
But For me, the answers perfectly clear.
There’s a reason the world looks at this picture and nods in agreement.
But just what exactly did they know?
The White House revealed on Wednesday night that President Bush was briefed on U.S. intelligence in August, while at his Crawford, Texas, ranch, that
bin Laden's network might hijack U.S. passenger planes.
A: But the White House insisted Bush received no information to suggest that bin Laden's al Qaeda network planned to use airplanes as missiles
Ok, fair enough. He didn’t receive a memo saying
‘’ These men are going to take these planes and hit these buildings ‘’
But lets look at what was put forward to the president.
1. FBI Written memo urging headquarters to investigate middle eastern men, enrolled in flight schools
2. Zacarias Moussaoui’s arrest.
3. Tennet Met with Rice and Cofer Black (CIA counter terrorism expert) and said an attack was imminent. Rice denies this meeting took place.
“Bush, the administration put domestic agencies on alert in the summer, just months before the Sept. 11 attacks”
• Warnings from leaders of other nations and foreign intelligence apparatus' of terrorist threats
• June 30, 2001 Senior Executive Intelligence Briefing (SEIB) entitled "bin Laden Threats Are Real"
• The threat of President Bush's assassination at the G-8 Summit by al Qaeda in July of 2001 – using aircraft to dive bomb the summit building
• July 2001 Phoenix memo, which told of potential terrorists taking flight lessons
• 52 FAA warnings – five of which mentioned al Qaeda's training for hijacking
• August 6, 2001 Presidential Daily Brief entitled "bin Laden Determined to Strike in US"
• National Intelligence Estimate (NIE)entitled "Islamist Extremists Learn to Fly"
• Intelligence agency heads describing themselves with their "hair on fire" to characterize the imminent nature of the threats they were
intercepting from Al Qaeda and their sense of urgency in relating them to the Bush Administration
• The arrest of Zacharias Moussaoui in August of 2001
• FBI Agent Harry Samit's 70 unsuccessful attempts to get a FISA Warrant to examine Moussaoui's belongings
Cetron said he warned the Pentagon that two events earlier that year — the crash-landing of a small airplane at the White House by an apparently
unstable man, and French authorities' storming of a hijacked airliner that Algerian terrorists had planned to fly into the Eiffel Tower — made an
airborne terrorist attack on the United States a very real possibility. "We knew that was going happen and we were scared,"
“ALEXANDRIA, Virginia (CNN) -- At Zacarias Moussaoui's sentencing trial, an FBI agent testified Tuesday about al Qaeda's training manual, what
the FBI knew prior to 9/11 about al Qaeda operatives' lessons at U.S. flight schools, and missed opportunities to learn more.”
“In the spring of 2001, Tom Wilshire, a C.I.A. liaison at F.B.I. headquarters, in Washington, was studying the relationship between Khaled
al-Mihdhar, the Saudi Al Qaeda operative, and Khallad, the one-legged jihadi. … “Something bad [is] definitely up,” Wilshire wrote to a
colleague. He asked permission to disclose this vital information to the F.B.I. His superiors at the C.I.A. never responded to his request.”