Civilization on this Planet, page 3

i've had just about enough of you marduk. the whole point of this thread was to discuss the possibility, and i intentionally left out most of the accepted numbers because i was afraid that threadjacking trolls such as yourself would use them in an attempt to derail the discussion into the validity of them, as i have seen happen many a time here.

the funny thing is that a)you dont seem to read the posts before you attack, and b) it's quite obvious that you have very little knowledge yourself and, assuming that i had no idea of what i was talking about, decided you could get away with it. try again.

Originally posted by Marduk
your claim that the worlds surface was covered with Glacial Ice is untenable

first, i did not say that. i said much of the livable world, and that was covered in my response to byrd (who, for the poster who called "him" oldfashioned, is a she), which you obviously didnt read....big flipping surprise. second, you and byrd immediately latched onto the idea that i was referencing the last iceage. where exactly did i say that? because in my original post (which you obviously didnt bother to read), i clearly stated that i was talking about a possibility of "tens or hundreds of thousands" of years. it's a discussion about the possibility. are you too close-minded for that?

but you wouldn't accept that. thats an ignorant position to take when someone more knowledgable than you has tried to tell you better and you didn't listen.

like yourself? someone who has googled a few things and thinks he knows it all? no, i think not.

Kasparov is ignorant if he's attempting to denegrate modern historians by criticising a book that was written over 200 years ago

more proof that you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. that book is still the authoratative book on the roman empire used as reference by historians all over the world.

you are again therefore ignorant for championing his ideas and the fact that he is not a historian of any kind seems lost on you

first of all, i didnt "champion" anyone's ideas....further proof that you didnt bother to read the whole thread. i am quite happy to have any information that furthers the discussion of whether or not we have been at this level of advancement many times before, which his web page did. second, you have as of yet to actually discuss the theory that i presented on the first page. all you've been doing to attempting to attack everything else that has been added since. maybe you would like to add to the discussion?

the fact that you don't know that the entire human population of earth was less than the current population of london (6 million)

actually, the more accepted number is 5 million, and i said as much in response to your post (check the first paragraph). again, at least make an attempt at reading the posts before you attack them with your ignorance.

and so are claiming that its impossible for them to exist on a planet that was no where near covered with ice suggests to me that you don't know any of the facts

i claimed nothing of the kind, and this whole quote is nothing but a flat out lie (or further proof that you dont bother to read the material before attacking it).

which is another example of your ignorance
denying Ignorance is the website motto
you're ignorant so I'm denying you
its that simple

so alternative theories and those who present them are ignorant, huh? wow, you just called the whole concept of ATS and it's founders ignorant. that takes cojones.