new alien photo of 'lord enlil' alien (lord marduk spokesman), page 3
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 2 times


reply posted on 20-11-2006 @ 11:37 PM by Indellkoffer
Originally posted by Gilgamesh
this link explains it all.

jamescasbolt.com...


It does. He's been debunked as quite the liar. And the photo is not believable. Someone's been spending way too much time watching "Stargate" and not enough time on their homework.

Yet another case where the "real photos' of aliens just provide more amusement for the masses and make UFO researchers look very stupid.


reply posted on 21-11-2006 @ 12:22 AM by rich23
Hmmmmm....

I've been checking into the death of Dean Warwick. This is the guy who keeled over at a conference in Blackpool recently.

On the
truthseeker website you can find audio clips of an interview he did.

I'm still looking around at the moment but my preliminary conclusion is that he was a nutter. I'm sorry to have to be so blunt about it, but he makes several claims that stretch my credulity way past breaking point.

Firstly, he claims that several survivors of the Lockerbie crash were allowed to die from hypothermia by the rescuers because they knew that the plane was brought down by a rocket, not a bomb. Now, I have to say I've been extremely skeptical about the official myth of that incident myself, and have some personal knowledge about it, since a friend of mine was actually on the plane and travelled on it from Frankfurt to Heathrow. I saw him shortly after the crash and he said that he had sat next to a US serviceman going home on leave, who was absolutely terrified because he'd heard rumours that a bomb was on the plane. When he heard about the crash his blood ran cold.

The magazine Private Eye did an excellent investigation into the crash and drove many huge holes through the official story. Apparently CIA men arrived on the scene very early and removed specific pieces of evidence from the scene... but this is the first I've heard of there being any survivors (and I find the idea of survivors unbelievable in itsef).

Secondly, he makes various claims about his involvement with military intelligence and that he was witness to experiments in which the US, the USSR and the UK collaborated to bring down buildings using "infrasound". You can tell where we're going here, can't you? He also says that Michael Meacher was sacked for revealing that he'd seen plans for bringing down the WTC several years before it happened. Now I know MM is one of the few British MPs to be skeptical of the official story of 9/11, and has been a critic of PNAC. I hadn't heard this additional detail and will be doing some digging to see if I can corroborate it.

So: either Dean Warwick was silenced because he really did know some outlandish stuff and was going to reveal it, or he was just an attention-seeker who keeled over from a heart attack on stage. Well, Tommy Cooper died on stage... it's not unprecedented. And when you listen to Warwick's voice, you do get the sense that this guy was wound up tighter than a cheap wristwatch.

There is, of course, another alternative: that he was bumped off as a warning to someone else, or as a disinfo tactic. I don't put a huge weight of probability on this one, but it occurs to me as another possibility.


reply posted on 21-11-2006 @ 09:52 AM by Gilgamesh

There are other photos of him slightly blurred with the same features, which would be hard to photoshop, especially as the person in front was much clearer.


I was too very impressed with the photos (and i work with photoshop every day).

The out of focus second image could be done by applying a slight motion blur/gaussian filter to the photo while de-selecting the womans head. The giveaway i feel is is in the first photo, as pointed out earlier: (the out of place 'S' shape around the collar area).

As a proffessional i see no indication however that the face has been photoshoped, it looks more like make up if anything! The wrinkles, folds of skin, lighting etc. on his face and collar are very realistic.


Also, there is a third view of him from a distance, which again would be hard to photoshop.


If you are refering to the third image, i believe it is a photo of some OTHER albino lord character who seems to have eyes that are very close together. It too is photoshoped very well if its fake.

In conclusion. confusion, the only real signs of photo shop to me is the 'S' shape on the collar of the first image. partly because i have been unable to find any of the orignal images on the internet (like the one of kissinger) if they are fake, so they must have come from some other source which is quite an extent to go to. also we still do not know who the other men in the photos are, or where the outdoor images were taken.

if its fake i find it unusual that the person with the skills to do the face would make a mistake like leaving a 's' on the photo.

it could be a mix of real and fake, this is a very complicated subject where the truth is different at every level. i also doubt james casbolt would be duped into a fake like this....although maybe he is a disinfo agent?! Why would he do this though, he doesnt have any books or sh*t to sell?


We are Talking about the Masons


what makes you think the website was made by masons?

[edit on 21-11-2006 by Gilgamesh]
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



WWIII - USS Enterprise, a dying Legend to be the FALSE FLAG !! ??
  Posted 16 days ago with 64 member flags
A Gigantic Pyramid on Ocean Sea Floor in Bermuda Triangle?
  Posted 11 days ago with 45 member flags
"The Internal Working Components of One type of UFO".
  Posted 15 days ago with 37 member flags
A new find, is hollow Earth real?
  Posted 19 days ago with 34 member flags
The Argument that Fukushima Was Sabotaged
  Posted 12 days ago with 14 member flags

Newest topics getting replies, in real-time:

Stop Bashing Us Military Folks.
  Rant, Posted 15 hours ago, 185 replies
Anonymous hacks CIA
  Breaking Alternative News, Posted 10 hours ago, 101 replies
Free Psychic Readings
  General Chit Chat, Posted 6 hours ago, 69 replies