It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Time frame for the Fall of America

page: 2
0
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 19 2006 @ 11:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Vitchilo


A) Before the 1st of the year
B) Between 2007 and the 2008 election
C) After the 2008 election
D) Within the next 3-5 years


A: First signs of an economic crash.
B: Full economic crash
C: Hilary Clinton... or people will wake up and elect a third party.
D: If there's not a third party... corporatism more wild...less rights...riots...big */*- ahead. People hungry, poverty...very bad/revolution/civil war.


That's the most realistic answer that I have seen yet Vitchilo.

However I don't think that they could be so stupid as to have not seen this comming. Which makes me think that we are being manipulated to do what they want us to do. So we can beat them at thier own game by doing exactly the opposite of what they think we will do and then we hold the cards.

[edit on 19-11-2006 by In nothing we trust]




posted on Nov, 19 2006 @ 11:59 PM
link   


However I don't think that they could be so stupid as to have not seen this comming.


The economic crash? They know it's coming, they are preparing to survive it. The US administration don't care, they want a crash to happen so they can further their globalisation and to weaken the USA.. and bring it to the North American Union. Business in California and others state already received their north american union business number.

Households:Liabilities:Credit Market Debt

Households:Mortage Equity Withdrawal

[edit on 20-11-2006 by Vitchilo]



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 12:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by Vitchilo


However I don't think that they could be so stupid as to have not seen this comming.


The economic crash? They know it's coming, they are preparing to survive it. The US administration don't care, they want a crash to happen so they can further their globalisation and to weaken the USA.. and bring it to the North American Union. Business in California and others state already received their north american union business number.

Households:Liabilities:Credit Market Debt

Households:Mortage Equity Withdrawal


Is that bad or good?

And why should I really care?

Will it really affect me?

Will I be any better or worse off when the change comes?

And how do you know?



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 12:54 AM
link   
You're from Europe? If so, it won't affect you... the economic crash will affect you, it will be a worldwide one because every economy is tied to another, maybe after that the world economy will change...

For the North American Union, it will be like the EU, but much worse... common currency, the amero... with the mexican economy.. yeah. All the illegal immigrants will now be legal. We'll have a north american RFID card... we'll need an OK from the Homeland security to get out or get in, just like URSS. We'll have a new constitution, with much less rights and a lot of power for the North american president... a common north american army...

It's a big part for the NWO. THIS IS VERY BAD.



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 12:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by Vitchilo
You're from Europe? If so, it won't affect you... the economic crash will affect you, it will be a worldwide one because every economy is tied to another, maybe after that the world economy will change...

For the North American Union, it will be like the EU, but much worse... common currency, the amero... with the mexican economy.. yeah. All the illegal immigrants will now be legal. We'll have a north american RFID card... we'll need an OK from the Homeland security to get out or get in, just like URSS. We'll have a new constitution, with much less rights and a lot of power for the North american president... a common north american army...

It's a big part for the NWO. THIS IS VERY BAD.


Why is this bad?



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 01:30 AM
link   

For the North American Union, it will be like the EU, but much worse... common currency, the amero... with the mexican economy.. yeah. All the illegal immigrants will now be legal. We'll have a north american RFID card... we'll need an OK from the Homeland security to get out or get in, just like URSS. We'll have a new constitution, with much less rights and a lot of power for the North american president... a common north american army...


Because of this? A north american police state? No rights, RFID chips, military in the streets, ect..

[edit on 20-11-2006 by Vitchilo]



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 01:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by Vitchilo
Because of this? A north american police state? No rights, RFID chips, military in the streets, ect..


Bullshi*

This is all just bullshi* dis-information ment to rile us up so that we start a revolution.

I say that we don't do a god dam* thing.



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 01:57 AM
link   

Bullshi*

This is all just bullshi* dis-information ment to rile us up so that we start a revolution.

I say that we don't do a god dam* thing.


Yeah... like how many people do you think are aware of all the crap that they are preparing for us? 100.000 worldwide max? Is it enough to start a revolution? Yes but we are too much seperate from each others... their will be or not a revolution when they will do a big obvious error and that they push too far too fast. Like humans chips, draft or martial law. Then, I think a lot of people will wake up and fight. Personnaly, I won't be calling for open revolution until they go too far.



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 02:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by Vitchilo

Bullshi*

This is all just bullshi* dis-information ment to rile us up so that we start a revolution.

I say that we don't do a god dam* thing.


I won't be calling for open revolution until they go too far.


They won't go to far. They will try and make up like a bunch of pussies.

They will back down now that they know, that we know, that they know, that we know.


[edit on 20-11-2006 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 02:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by DickBinBush
Half the world will be destroyed in the process. It will be hell. But in the end, as usual, the United States will come out on top. I guess I'm a realist now.


Fuc* it, lets just blow it up.


Wait, let's not blow it up.


Oh hell just roll the damn dice.

[edit on 20-11-2006 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 02:15 AM
link   

Originally posted by HankMcCoy
You people act like an 8 year presidency means ANYTHING in the long term history of a country. In a hundred years, Bush will be just another paragraph in an 11th grade history book.

You are correct.

Wonder if people thought that about Chenney and Rummsfield in the 70/80's
Or even the Bush legacy in the eraly 90's.

Do you think Iraq will be nothing but history page material in 20yrs?
What about the new breed of iraqi terrorists.. will they be nothing but history in a decade?

Just because bush ends in a few years.. doesnt mean the destruction he has brought on the planet will.
and the devistation he has caused to the moral fabric of america will NEVER be forgotten.



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 02:17 AM
link   
I am just going to point out, you seem only to be considering America being attacked or similar. What if there was a big natural disaster, which affected more than Katrina? You wouldn't even need Yellowstone (as an example) to give it's full power, a smaller eruption in the middle of the US would still disrupt the economy, cause mass panic etc.



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 02:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by apex
I am just going to point out, you seem only to be considering America being attacked or similar. What if there was a big natural disaster, which affected more than Katrina? You wouldn't even need Yellowstone (as an example) to give it's full power, a smaller eruption in the middle of the US would still disrupt the economy, cause mass panic etc.


Wouldn't that just throw a stone into the plans of the New World Order zionists.



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 02:23 AM
link   
I see what you mean, the potential for Martial law and similar, but what you perhaps don't remember is that with an eruption, you will get a massive ash cloud across the US, which would make effective air transport (for Martial law or rescue) very difficult.



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 02:29 AM
link   

Originally posted by apex
I see what you mean, the potential for Martial law and similar, but what you perhaps don't remember is that with an eruption, you will get a massive ash cloud across the US, which would make effective air transport (for Martial law or rescue) very difficult.


Who exactly are they gonna make money off of if they can't get thier planes off the ground?

You guys gotta re-think this martial law bullshi*. They will only declare martial law if the fatherless sons from broken families come back from Iraq in a pissy mood and start looking for vengence.

Best thing to do is keep the war going on forever, maybe even institute a draft and ship some more potential domestic enemy combatents overseas, before they can become a threat to the state.


[edit on 20-11-2006 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 02:34 AM
link   

Originally posted by In nothing we trust

You guys gotta re-think this martial law bullshi*. They will only declare martial law if the fatherless sons from broken families come back from Iraq in a pissy mood and start looking for vengence.

[edit on 20-11-2006 by In nothing we trust]


Well I never said country wide martial law, it could be local.

And it would completely collapse the economy and the infrastructure such as the food from disruption of the farmlands. Not to mention the two years or so of winter that would be caused.



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 02:42 AM
link   

Originally posted by apex
... it would completely collapse the economy and the infrastructure such as the food from disruption of the farmlands.


The only reason to cause an economic collapse is to force the people to accept change. People only accept change under adverse conditions. Martial law is just the way that THEY would maintain THIER saftey during the transitition period.

A natural disaster would foil THIER plans by catching THEM unprepared, allowing US to implement OUR plans.


[edit on 20-11-2006 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 02:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by In nothing we trust
A natural disaster would foil THIER plans by catching THEM unprepared, allowing US to implement OUR plans.
[edit on 20-11-2006 by In nothing we trust]


Sorry, I think I misunderstood you before. Good idea, it does however mean that you need to know what to do as well and in essence, be better than FEMA at FEMAs job.



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 02:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by apex
... it does however mean that you need to know what to do as well.


I would have to give a rats ass about my condition first. I'm just a dependant consumer of the corporate system, so I don't really care one way or the other.


I got a gun, a can of peaches, a credit card, a bible and a pack of matches, I'm good.



[edit on 20-11-2006 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Nov, 20 2006 @ 03:07 AM
link   
Everything has become an illusion of an illusion. Bullshi* to cover bullshi*. You can thank the lawyers for that.

Let's blow the fuc* out of them.




top topics



 
0
<< 1    3 >>

log in

join