It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by glastonaut
Originally posted by jaamaan
a third note or beat is also heard. this third note is not inherent in either note but only as a synergetic consequence of their unity, constructed in the brain.
Hi, this bit of info is incorrect, the 'third note' is present naturally and not as a consequence of brain reconstruction.
It says nothing about the addition of positive integers in arithmetic unfortunately, so it can't be used to prove 1+1=3
Originally posted by PuRe EnErGy
But I argue the brain constructs all of the notes.. so it is all natural.. and not as a consequence of brain reconstruction because it is all brain CONSTRUCTION.. it doesn't reconstruct what it has constructed in the manner you are thinking.. That would be like refurbishing and doing a restoration on a brand new building.
So science is even incorrect. Thats the problem.. observer bias.
Originally posted by glastonaut
Originally posted by PuRe EnErGy
But I argue the brain constructs all of the notes.. so it is all natural.. and not as a consequence of brain reconstruction because it is all brain CONSTRUCTION.. it doesn't reconstruct what it has constructed in the manner you are thinking.. That would be like refurbishing and doing a restoration on a brand new building.
So science is even incorrect. Thats the problem.. observer bias.
These signals can be measured on an oscilloscope. I'm not sure where you are going with the argument that the third note is a construct of the brain when it can be clearly viewed using scientific apparatus.
You are taking either a 'Kantian' categorical imperative and saying everything is imagined, or you aren't understanding the physics properly.
You are taking either a 'Kantian' categorical imperative and saying everything is imagined, or you aren't understanding the physics properly.
“All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force... We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter.” Max Planck
Without you too look at those oscilloscopes they don't even exist... Everything is a construct of thought... which can clearly be demonstrated by the fact that the machines to gauge these responses were created by humans from the recesses of their thought.
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein
“Science cannot solve the ultimate mystery of nature. And that is because, in the last analysis, we ourselves are a part of the mystery that we are trying to solve.” Max Planck
Originally posted by etshrtslr
You are taking either a 'Kantian' categorical imperative and saying everything is imagined, or you aren't understanding the physics properly.
I guess Max Planck did not understand physics either.
“All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force... We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Mind. This Mind is the matrix of all matter.” Max Planck
Originally posted by jaamaan
"Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one." Albert Einstein
so mostly 1+1=2
but still sometimes 3
why ?
can anyone explain this better?
I'm sorry but your comment is a very ignorant statement..
Originally posted by PuRe EnErGy
physics is dead.... it doesn't apply to the planck scale.
Originally posted by PuRe EnErGy
Without you too look at those oscilloscopes they don't even exist...
Originally posted by PuRe EnErGy
Everything is a construct of thought... which can clearly be demonstrated by the fact that the machines to gauge these responses were created by humans from the recesses of their thought.
Originally posted by glastonaut
Originally posted by PuRe EnErGy
physics is dead.... it doesn't apply to the planck scale.
Since Physics sets the Planck scale, I haven't a clue what you mean by this. As a PhD trained Particle Physicist I'm very interested in how you come up with that statement.
Originally posted by PuRe EnErGy
Without you too look at those oscilloscopes they don't even exist...
A philosophical, not scientific, observation.
Originally posted by PuRe EnErGy
Everything is a construct of thought... which can clearly be demonstrated by the fact that the machines to gauge these responses were created by humans from the recesses of their thought.
Thoughts can manifest in reality as action, but also you can argue reality (the physical world) is the cause of thought. Either way the argument goes nowhere.
Originally posted by PuRe EnErGy
Because the old physics BY themselves does NOT explain things accurately..
Originally posted by PuRe EnErGy
Thoughts can manifest in reality as action, but also you can argue reality (the physical world) is the cause of thought. Either way the argument goes nowhere.
Because your looking for it to go no-where... would you look in the hole the dirt came from to find the dirt removed from it?...