It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There was also some controversy over a decision to allow Belarus to take on targets under Kyoto that would allow it to profit from emissions trading. If ratified by member countries, environmentalists warned it could add ``hot air'' to the system since Belarus saw a substantial drop in its greenhouse gases following the collapse of the Soviet Union and its economy.
The environmentalists predicted it would put Belarus in the same boat as Russia, allowing it to increase emissions and sell millions of tonnes in ``hot air'' credits at the same time.
Originally posted by danwild6
Canada's emissions have actually increased nearly 25%.
Originally posted by danwild6
Does Canada have any other options but to leave the agreement? And if Canada should choose to stay what price would Canadians be willing to pay to reach their nations target?
Originally posted by chissler
Seems like each country has different goals. Canada is punished for not meeting its goals, while other countries are enforced lighter restrictions and not punished for meeting the goals. Hell they are offered more incentives when are not meeting their goals. That is my take on it anyways.
Originally posted by chissler
I've read the article twice, and can not find this anywhere. Can you provide a link to indicate these figures?
But the Conservative government has blamed the previous Liberal government for allowing the emissions that contribute to global warming to rise by nearly 27 per cent, instead of moving closer to Canada's Kyoto target of reducing emissions by six per cent below 1990 levels.
Originally posted by danwild6
Sorry chissler but the edit window has closed. But I'll be more careful in the future(didn't realize how touchy Canucks were ).
Originally posted by chissler
It's not a matter of being touchy, or Canadian. The title itself is false, and misleading. However, by now means necessary am I insinuating that it was a deliberate attempt at anything. I'm sure it was an honest mistake that you would of never been aware of if I hadn't stuck my big mouth in. Please, take no offence to my post.
Originally posted by chissler
And yes, we canucks can be touchy at times. Another stereotype for us to overcome.