It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jonna
Originally posted by dAlen
Is it possible that its only a comforting thought?
Well, why not? It was once comforting to think that god made everything for man and that the earth was the center of the universe because of man's importance. At the time this 'perceived truth' was accepted on faith and ego because man could not test such a theory yet. Is the concept of a soul really all that different?
[edit on 17-11-2006 by Jonna]
Originally posted by Strodyn
There are traps in most religions to try to keep people from straying.
Originally posted by dAlen
Sorry, but Im looking for information from Journals of Nature, Medicine, JAMA, etc.
Actual periodicals that have a standing in the field of science & medicine.
If its there, I would like to read it, but I bet they are still scratching their heads...
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
What I think happens regarding conciousness is this. Nuerons in small organisms are basically responsable for sensing the immediate environment and then reacting to it to preserve it's self for basic survival.
What machines don't get to have souls? Only biological things can have souls? Wheres it say that? What say the people about my CrAaaazY theory.
Originally posted by dAlen
near-death aint good enough.
Originally posted by apex
Originally posted by dAlen
near-death aint good enough.
Just out of interest, how can someone who experiences something when they are, to the current medical technology, completely dead be not enough proof? Is that not evidence that the soul exists? And also people who have seen something outside of their room that they have never seen before when having an NDE, how can that be "not good enough"?
Originally posted by JSquared
Do I have an answer as to how that soul came in to being? I have hypotheses, but no answer.
Can I even define what a soul is? No. It's an energy, or a conscience.
It is a journey that we must all take for ourselves.
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
I don't think there is a soul at all. I think it's more of an illusion.
What I think happens regarding conciousness is this. Nuerons in small organisms are basically responsable for sensing the immediate environment and then reacting to it to preserve it's self for basic survival.
I feel that initially these neurons can act out their functions independantly of each other, for they aren't yet competing for resources in the organism. As things progress and become more complex the nuerons have to start intercommunicating on a basic level to fight for priority of resources within the organism.
I think there is a net effect of all these over lapping nuerons fighting for what they need, and that this inturn appears to be conciousness, eventhough it is more like a complex computerlike algorithm. The net effect of all these things are what we precieve as conciousness and we dub it a soul. I think in actuallity our personalities, soul, subconcious (nuerons arguing), and conciousness (net effect of nuerons) are really just a simple phenomina although really complex in details that is more akin to a 'ghost in the machine' concept. I feel that this phenomina will arise when anyhting gets this complex. What happens to machines when their algorythems for self preservation,maintenance, etc... develope to a point where they create a net effect that manifests as a self aware conciousness. We would have to admit that we have invented intelligent life, especially if it can reproduce it's self in any manner, and we would have to argue that the machine would have a soul, and desires.
What machines don't get to have souls? Only biological things can have souls? Wheres it say that? What say the people about my CrAaaazY theory.
Originally posted by dAlen
[
- Yes, it definitley seems like a journey we take ourselves, and strangley enough we drag everyone along with us.
Originally posted by JSquared
I'll share a story...
Originally posted by Strodyn
Originally posted by dAlen
[
- Yes, it definitley seems like a journey we take ourselves, and strangley enough we drag everyone along with us.
I am going to have to WATS you for that, because it is probably the only real provable truth said here today.
Originally posted by dAlen
- I am curious, if you dont mind, of your hypothesis.
- Yes, it definitley seems like a journey we take ourselves, and strangley enough we drag everyone along with us.
Originally posted by WiseSheep
Originally posted by etshrtslr
I would beg to differ...people have come back life after death.
Here's an interesting video here concerning the topic.
Originally posted by JSquared
Originally posted by dAlen
- I am curious, if you dont mind, of your hypothesis.
- Yes, it definitley seems like a journey we take ourselves, and strangley enough we drag everyone along with us.
Ha!...you had to go there didn't you?
I'll be the first one to admit my hypothesis really has no way of being tested and really is a conglomerate of all knowledge I have ever gained, and a little bit of faith....
I believe we all have a soul (or spirt)....
I believe most living thing have the same (animals, plants, etc.)...
I also believe that the purpose of these souls are unknown, but that is part of our purpose for being here....We are supposed to seek that purpose....
Throughout history, countless people have sought the purpose of our existence..This has given birth to countless religions, countless philosophies, and countless ideas....Over the years, these things have been twisted and distorted to benefit goals of the flesh (to serve ourselves)
I believe that if one wades through the pool of ideas, you get back to the same basic principles.....We must care for ourselves...We must care for others...and We must care for our home (Earth, for now)...
Well then, how did we all get here? Science has tried to prove that we can come from elements that exist naturally in the universe.....Religion (the major ones at least) want you to believe that one being created this universe and everything in it....So when you get to the bottom of it, both of them can actually be right....A driving force, from nothing, could have created the elements of the universe, which in turn, could have created everything that exists...
The problem arises, that we cannot prove either one is correct, so everyone takes sides and bickers about it endlessly....We often fail to see the similarities and choose to argue about the differences......
Another problem is that there eventually has to be a starting point, and we cannot grasp that there could ever be a point that NOTHING existed....Even I don't have the answers to all of that...I guess that is where faith comes in....We cannot explain things, so we have to have faith that one day we will get the answer...
So, actually, my hypothesis raises more questions than the answers it comes up with......I can't keep typing because I am at work, but I will try to check back in tonight to explain things better......
Originally posted by JSquared
Ha!...you had to go there didn't you?
I'll be the first one to admit my hypothesis really has no way of being tested and really is a conglomerate of all knowledge I have ever gained, and a little bit of faith....
I believe we all have a soul (or spirt)....
I believe most living thing have the same (animals, plants, etc.)...
I also believe that the purpose of these souls are unknown, but that is part of our purpose for being here....We are supposed to seek that purpose....
Throughout history, countless people have sought the purpose of our existence..This has given birth to countless religions, countless philosophies, and countless ideas....Over the years, these things have been twisted and distorted to benefit goals of the flesh (to serve ourselves)
I believe that if one wades through the pool of ideas, you get back to the same basic principles.....We must care for ourselves...We must care for others...and We must care for our home (Earth, for now)...
Well then, how did we all get here? Science has tried to prove that we can come from elements that exist naturally in the universe.....Religion (the major ones at least) want you to believe that one being created this universe and everything in it....So when you get to the bottom of it, both of them can actually be right....A driving force, from nothing, could have created the elements of the universe, which in turn, could have created everything that exists...
The problem arises, that we cannot prove either one is correct, so everyone takes sides and bickers about it endlessly....We often fail to see the similarities and choose to argue about the differences......
Another problem is that there eventually has to be a starting point, and we cannot grasp that there could ever be a point that NOTHING existed....Even I don't have the answers to all of that...I guess that is where faith comes in....We cannot explain things, so we have to have faith that one day we will get the answer...
So, actually, my hypothesis raises more questions than the answers it comes up with......I can't keep typing because I am at work, but I will try to check back in tonight to explain things better......
Originally posted by JSquared
Originally posted by dAlen
- I am curious, if you dont mind, of your hypothesis.
- Yes, it definitley seems like a journey we take ourselves, and strangley enough we drag everyone along with us.
Ha!...you had to go there didn't you?
Originally posted by JSquared
Well then, how did we all get here? Science has tried to prove that we can come from elements that exist naturally in the universe.....Religion (the major ones at least) want you to believe that one being created this universe and everything in it....So when you get to the bottom of it, both of them can actually be right....A driving force, from nothing, could have created the elements of the universe, which in turn, could have created everything that exists...
The problem arises, that we cannot prove either one is correct, so everyone takes sides and bickers about it endlessly....We often fail to see the similarities and choose to argue about the differences......
Another problem is that there eventually has to be a starting point, and we cannot grasp that there could ever be a point that NOTHING existed....Even I don't have the answers to all of that...I guess that is where faith comes in....We cannot explain things, so we have to have faith that one day we will get the answer...
So, actually, my hypothesis raises more questions than the answers it comes up with......I can't keep typing because I am at work, but I will try to check back in tonight to explain things better......