It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DYepes
[url=http://www.whoschoosing.org.uk/smoking/environment.htm]
Many poorer countries use wood to dry tobacco and have to cut down many trees to do this. In countries where wood is used for cooking and heating then if it is also used to dry tobacco, there is less for the people to use to cook their food and heat their homes.
Originally posted by yanchek
Originally posted by selfless
It's the smoker who's doing the harm not the victim.
Nonsmokers are smokers too.
They are called drivers.
Originally posted by DYepes
If trillions of those things end up on the ground every year, tell me now, how many is that over the course of 70 years?
It is estimated that several trillion cigarette butts are littered worldwide every year. That's billions of cigarettes flicked, one at a time, on our sidewalks, beaches, nature trails, gardens, and other public places every single day. In fact, cigarettes are the most littered item in America and the world. Cigarette filters are made of cellulose acetate tow, NOT COTTON, and they can take decades to degrade. Not only does cigarette litter ruin even the most picturesque setting, but the toxic residue in cigarette filters is damaging to the environment, and littered butts cause numerous fires every year, some of them fatal.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Smoking should be banned throughout the entire world.
Its your right to smoke correct... because you have the phyiscal ability to put a cancerstick into your mouth, its your right.
Well, its my right to physically place my hands around your neck squeeze until u go limp too...
just because you have the CHOICE to do something, doesnt mean its your RIGHT!
smoking hurts the people AROUND YOU.
Its a DRUG, an ADDICTIVE DRUG that affects your body.
The only reason cigerettes are still legal, is because they provide governments with enough funding during elections, to ensure when they are elected they dont allow any laws to pass putting pressure on their nice fat incomes.
Your right smoking is your choice, but after you've done it for 30yrs, and your trying to stop.. how many of you say '' damn, I wish I never started it has changed my life ''
Thumbs up the Belmont, they have taken a risk of angering voters here, but after they lose the addictive nature for these cancer sticks, the people will turn a leaf and thank them for giving them back a healthy life style.
When your given one life on the planet, one chance to love your childeren, watch them grow.. one life to be happy and learn as much as you can.. why are you willing to diminish it just so you can have a fag?
just so you can Stink...
have yellow teeth,
messy skin...
mucasy filled lungs..
brittle hair...
empty wallet...
yeah.. how dare they ban cigerettes.. its my right to kill myself.
well go do it somewhere out of sight so we dont have to suffer while you do.
Originally posted by closettrekkie
I find it interesting that the same people who post about fascism, police states, and governmental control are the same ones who actually say the government should ban smoking in its entirety!
I am a smoker, but I have never minded when they banned smoking in restaurants, shopping centers, etc. I don't agree with a government ban on it, but if the private owners don't want smoking in their establishment that's within their rights and I respect that. Smoke does seep into the carpeting, walls and furniture and I don't blame them for wanting to protect their investments. I just don't think the government should be telling the owners of these establishments that they HAVE to ban it.
I also think it is outrageous that they are banning it from condos and your own vehicle!!! When I read that I was so angry! They have no right to tell you what you can or can't do in your own car as long as it is not impairing your ability to drive. As far as condos go, that is a place that you bought. It is your property and unless it was established as a non-smoking condo when you bought it, they shouldn't tell you that all of a sudden the rules have changed.
I also don't understand why you can't smoke outside. You're not going to get cancer because the smoke dissapates in the wind. There are far many other things that will make you sick than that. And the non-smokers can always go somewhere where you aren't smoking.
I will NEVER agree with a law that the government creates that takes away the freedom to do what we want to do on our own property.
Originally posted by selfless
The ones that smokes want to be able to smoke and the ones who don't smoke don't want to have smoke in their face, it's not hypocracy.
Those who smoke outside are harming no one else so that point is invalid.
The difference between the 2 is that the ones who don't smoke are not harming them selves or anyone around them.
It's not for supporting the government but to support a better state of living and a better planet.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Correct,
But you drinking alcohol next to me wont affect me.
I couldnt care less what your addicted to, as long as your addiction doesnt impact me whiel your using it.
Coffee and caffiene do not have the same addicting ability of cigerettes.
Comparing coffee to cigerettes doesnt work...
If I drink coffee every day for 50yrs.. I wont die a horrible death.
but If I smoke cigerettes every day for 50yrs.. what do you believe the outcome?
Keep your cigerettes, but smoke them in your own houise.. so its only your fmaily that suffers from your addiction.
Originally posted by selfless
The ones that smokes want to be able to smoke and the ones who don't smoke don't want to have smoke in their face, it's not hypocracy.
The difference between the 2 is that the ones who don't smoke are not harming them selves or anyone around them.
It's not for supporting the government but to support a better state of living and a better planet.
No hypocracy here.
Originally posted by zerotime
To me, smokers are on the same level as the guy in a restaurant who is yelling into his cell phone.
Originally posted by lakewoodrealtor
What is next citys banning food with fat?
I agree 100% If my choice is to restart smoking, I have that right... as much as (atm) I don't ever want to.. There's another Quote that comes to mind by Benjamin Franklin: "He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither". And sometimes Security means banning the joys of Freedom.. some freedom is smoking on their break to get away from the drama in work, shcool, life.
Originally posted by closettrekkieI will NEVER agree with a law that the government creates that takes away the freedom to do what we want to do on our own property.