It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


why argue about possible global warming when petrol emmissions are poisonous without a doubt

page: 1

log in


posted on Nov, 14 2006 @ 03:10 AM
Global warming is not what should be argued, It comes down to this one simple fact.

Emmisions from petroleum/fossil fuel products put out a poisonous effect, put your head to a cars exhaust and see how long you can last, fly a helicoptor over a smoke stack of a petrol cracking processing station and see what happens. Forget about global warming the real issue is that we knowingly without arguement are putting out poisonous emmisions from our industrial activities, when we could partake in albeit more expensive but a lot healthier alternatives.

Its that simple petrol emmissions are poisonous, who cares if they warm the earth they do make the air a lot unhealthier to breathe.

posted on Nov, 14 2006 @ 09:09 AM
This might have been an argument 10 years ago, but now we know and have hard evidence that global warming is occuring through human activity. I ahte the way it boils down to money though...

Only after the last tree has been cut down,
Only after the last river has been poisoned,
Only after the last fish has been caught,
Only then will you find you cannot eat money,
Only then will you find you only have one enviroment to live in,
Only then will you find those capitalistic idiots with noone to sell anything to.

new topics

log in