It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Strange Skeleton found in Chile

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 02:17 PM
link   
There's a skeleton in my chilli !!!!!


Click here for photos:

www.ovniaventura.com...

Institute of Hispanic Ufology
11-13-3

SANTIAGO -- Alberto Urquiza, a renowned researcher and member of the GEO Group, a Chilean agency devoded to the study of various anomalous phenomena, presented three exclusive images to Terra.cl regarding the strange skeleton found in the city of Concepci�n in Chile's 8th Region.



According to Urquiza, the group shall receive the specimen on Friday to submit it to a variety of analytical procedures at the hands of experts in order to ascertain its nature. The resarcher believes for the moment that they could be the remains of a "strange animal" although he refuses to put forth any hypotheses until the tests have been fully performed.

The persons who found the odd skeleton are determined to find an explanation for it -- the contrary of what has happened in other similar cases in the country. This, says Urquiza, will allow "the tests and the diffusion of the find to be nearly simultaneous, thus favoring transparency and accountability in the reporting process."

The skeleton presents no upper extremities and as can be seen in the images, shows taloned legs.

These remains can be added to the ones already found in Iquique, presented less than a month ago, and also in Concepci�n (the so-called TOY case) approximately a year ago.


Translation (C) 2003 Scott Corrales, Institute of Hispanic Ufology (IHU). Special thanks to Ovniaventura.com










[Edited on 13-11-2003 by fortean]

[Edited on 13-11-2003 by fortean]



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 02:30 PM
link   
wow, interesting topic fortean. That skeleton is wierd..New species? or just dinosaur?



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 02:34 PM
link   
Hmmm.

It could be yet another case of several skeletons thrown together.

I'm fairly convinced it's a cat's skull

Cat


'new' skull



[Edited on 13-11-2003 by Zzub]

[Edited on 13-11-2003 by Zzub]



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 02:34 PM
link   
It could be chubacca. (Sorry, can't spell that word)
That thing that's been killing livestock in mexico.
But It's probably just a dinosar.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 02:37 PM
link   
Yes, Zub.

I agree. I thought that skull looked familiar.
I've eaten many of those in my day.




posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 02:39 PM
link   

Originally posted by fortean
I've eaten many of those in my day.


LOL! I hope the itchyness clears up!



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 02:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Zzub
Hmmm.

It could be yet another case of several skeletons thrown together.

I'm fairly convinced it's a cat's skull

Cat


'new' skull



[Edited on 13-11-2003 by Zzub]

[Edited on 13-11-2003 by Zzub]


Maybe its a Catasaurus?



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 03:31 PM
link   
I'm no dinosaur expert but if its a dinosaur skeleton it would be a fossil (minerals replace bone material). And that thing doesn't look like a fossil to me.


unless its a dinosaur that recently died.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 03:34 PM
link   
What the hell happened to its front legs?



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 03:47 PM
link   
They decided not to add them to make it seem strange



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 03:47 PM
link   


What the hell happened to its front legs?


fortean ate em! lol



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 05:03 PM
link   
Woah! WTF is that? It looks mammilian..

Is it just me or does that thing have two tails?



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 05:05 PM
link   
Meow, Meow, anybody got any fish?



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 05:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Rosenalla
Woah! WTF is that? It looks mammilian..

Is it just me or does that thing have two tails?


I think it's a shadow of the one tail you are looking at.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 05:08 PM
link   
This should end the confusion and whoever said it was a different skeletons thrown together is absolutlely right.

www.skullsunlimited.com...



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 08:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by BaileyTheSwitcher
This should end the confusion and whoever said it was a different skeletons thrown together is absolutlely right.

www.skullsunlimited.com...



nope!! that skull is nowhere on those pages.
look at the eye-sockets



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 09:09 PM
link   
By all means, this looks like a cat skull, and for the most part, the body looks about accurate too. I'm wondering if they found the body incomplete or if it was a birth defect to explain where the front legs are. Also, it seems pretty big to be without legs naturally. That raises other questions such as how did it survive to that size if it had no front paws. My theory is it is an incomplete cat skeleton.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 09:29 PM
link   
The skull is feline, but the feet are plantigrade, probably a racoon or a coati mundi. 2 skeletons combined, IMO....



posted on Nov, 14 2003 @ 12:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by herm
The skull is feline, but the feet are plantigrade, probably a racoon or a coati mundi. 2 skeletons combined, IMO....


It's either a hoax or a freak of nature



posted on Nov, 14 2003 @ 12:56 AM
link   

It could be chubacca. (Sorry, can't spell that word)
That thing that's been killing livestock in mexico.
But It's probably just a dinosar.


Well you never know, Chupacabra COULD be related to dinosaurs!!!




top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join