It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The text of the resolution, which was sponsored by Arab states, also condemned the firing of rockets by Palestinian fighters into Israel.
It would also have called on the diplomatic Quartet consisting of the United Nations, United States, European Union and Russian Federation to take immediate steps to stabilize the situation, including through the possible establishment of “an international mechanism for the protection of the civilian populations.”
Source
The Security Council,
“Reaffirming it previous resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 446 (1979), 1322 (2000), 1397 (2002), 1402 (2002), 1403 (2002), 1405 (2002), 1435 (2002), 1515 (2003), and 1544 (2004),
“Reaffirming the applicable rules and principles of international law, including humanitarian and human rights laws, in particular the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949,
“Expressing its grave concern at the continued deterioration of the situation on the ground in the Palestinian Territory occupied by Israel since 1967, during the recent period, particularly as a result of the excessive and disproportionate use of force by Israel, the occupying Power, which has caused extensive loss of civilian Palestinian life and injuries, including among children and women,
“Condemning the military operations being carried out by Israel, the occupying Power, in the Gaza Strip, in particular the attack that took place in Beit Hanoun on 8 November 2006, which have caused loss of civilian life and extensive destruction of Palestinian property and vital infrastructure,
“Condemning also the firing of rockets from Gaza into Israel,
“1. Calls upon Israel, the occupying Power, to immediately cease its military operations that endangers the Palestinian civilian population in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and to immediately withdraw its forces from within the Gaza Strip to positions prior to 28 June 2006;
“2. Calls for an immediate halt of all acts of violence and military activities between the Israeli and Palestinian side as was agreed in the Sharm El-Sheikh understandings of 8 February 2005;
“3. Requests the Secretary-General to establish a fact-finding mission on the attack that took place in Beit Hanoun on 8 November 2006 within thirty days;
“4. Calls upon Israel, the occupying Power, to scrupulously abide by its obligations and responsibilities under the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949;“5. Calls upon the Palestinian Authority to take immediate and sustained action to bring an end to violence, including the firing of rockets on Israeli territory;
“6. Emphasizes the need to preserve the Palestinian institutions, infrastructure and properties;
“7. Expresses grave concern about the dire humanitarian situation of the Palestinian people and calls for the provision of emergency assistance to them;
“8. Calls upon the international community, including the Quartet, to take immediate steps, to stabilize the situation and restart the peace process, including through the possible establishment of an international mechanism for protection of the civilian populations;
“9. Calls upon the parties supported by the international community to take immediate steps including confidence-building measures, with the objective of resuming peace negotiations;
“10. Stresses the importance of, and the need to achieve, a just, comprehensive, and lasting peace in the Middle East, based on all its relevant resolutions including its resolutions 242 (1967), 338 (1973), 1397 (2002) and 1515 (2003), the Madrid terms of reference, the principle of land for peace, the Arab Peace Initiative adopted by the League of Arab States Summit in March 2002 in Beirut and the Road Map;
UN
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The United States vetoed Saturday a U.N. Security Council draft resolution that sought to condemn an Israeli military offensive in the Gaza Strip and demand that Israeli troops pull out of the territory.
U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said the United States was "disturbed" that the Arab-backed draft resolution was "biased against Israel and politically motivated."
"This resolution does not display an evenhanded characterization of the recent events in Gaza, nor does it advance the cause of Israeli-Palestinian peace to which we aspire and for which we are working assiduously," he told the Security Council.
It was the second U.S. veto of a Security Council draft resolution concerning Israeli military operations in Gaza this year. The U.S. blocked action on a document this summer after Israel launched its offensive in response to the capture of an Israeli soldier by Hamas-linked Palestinian militants
Source
The United States vetoed a UN draft resolution that would have called for an end to Israeli attacks and "disproportionate use of force" in the Gaza Strip as well as for the release of a kidnapped Israeli soldier.
The Security Council resolution received 10 votes, one against from the United States with four abstentions, French Ambassador Jean-Marc de la Sabliere, the council president for July, announced.
Source
U.S. Ambassador John Bolton said the United States was "disturbed" that the Arab-backed draft resolution was "biased against Israel and politically motivated."
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Imagine Mexico lobbing bombs at us. How long before we had F16's flying over head and troops on the ground? A few hours at the most huh. But only then .. until it happens do we begin to see the truth.
Mr. Bolton is a smart man.
Notice, Arab backed. Not politically motivated?
Imagine Mexico lobbing bombs at us. How long before we had F16's flying over head and troops on the ground? A few hours at the most huh. But only then .. until it happens do we begin to see the truth.
Israel is doing exactly what any nation on earth would do in their situation, they act in a perfectly logical manor and nothing near "illegal".
Originally posted by bodrul
its funny how people jump out in the deffence of israel finding any excuess or reason to justify the murder or women and children kind of pathetic.
wont say who but i hope that one day those who justify murder get what they deserve
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Let me ask you this. How many people are sad when they see that a Palestinian suicide bomber, or a rocket has hit a market, a club, a house in Israel and innocent people die? How many actually care about that? How many people would take the time to post a thread condemning the attacks? ...
Originally posted by pepsi78
hmmm i dont get it the resolution was condemning 2 sides not only israel.
It was condemning palestine for launching rockets , and condemning israel for the masacre that just took place.
So again why veto it?
since this resolution has nothing to do with politics since actual people died as a result of military action I don't see how bolton justifies the veto.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
to the guy that said Israel should not treat the Palestinians any worse or better then their own civilians you are absolutely correct. When Palestinians stop trying to kill Israelis anyways. Kind of hard to be nice to someone that wants to launch that one last rocket before a peace treaty is signed.
Israel is doing exactly what any nation on earth would do in their situation, they act in a perfectly logical manor and nothing near "illegal".
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Let me ask you this. How many people are sad when they see that a Palestinian suicide bomber, or a rocket has hit a market, a club, a house in Israel and innocent people die? How many actually care about that? How many people would take the time to post a thread condemning the attacks?
Originally posted by Rockpuck
It is not a one sided I stand with Israel deal here, at least with me I am very middle of the road.. but I don't think that stance is respected much.. in fact you would rather I stand with you, or with Israel supporters. But while both parties act like barbarians both will get treated as such. And most often I come off as supporting Israel because I feel the need to repute the "oh feel sorry for poor Palestinians because big mean Israel bombed them for no reason" because that is not true at all.