It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by snafu7700
she is punished every single time a suicide bomber hits a bus, or a rocket hits an apartment complex, or it's citizens are kidnapped. just because there are no sanctions against israel for mistakes it has made in combat of cowards hiding behind civilians, doesnt mean she isnt punished.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
Too bad the civilians were in bed 1km away from the freedom fighters which proves your outrageous theory incorrect.
posted by stumason
posted by ....??? For sure they knew. British intelligence as early as 1941 had a complete view of the nazi's plans of "Vernichtung", extermination. They followed the build up of Auschwitz and the whole logistic and industrial complex involved, IG Farben developing Cyklon-B, the laying out of railtracks to make it an efficient machine.
They could very easy early on have hindered or seriously delayed those plans. But the Brits did nothing.
As to why, one has to remember Britain by tradition and history has been one of the most anti-semitic countries in the world. Also, just prior to WW2, in 1936 Edward VIII gave up the throne, officially because of love to a divorced American woman, Mrs. Simpson, who according to FBI reports had another loveaffair with the German ambassador to Britain, von Ribbentrop, a top nazi soon to become Foreign Minister of Germany. But Edward himself was widely known for his pre-war nazi sympathies.
A sidestep to show that British admiration for the ideology of Hitler went far up in the ruling classes. So of course they didn't bomb IG Farben or the railroads to Auschwitz, never once they did. Instead they killed hundred of thousands of innocent civilians in the firestorm of Dresden, a city without the slightest strategic or logistic value ...or those of Hamburg, Hannover and Bremen, the strongholds of anti nazi resistance in Germany. Places where Hitler never once did hold a speech or any massrally.
Errr, "Speakeroftruth", let's correct some glaring inaccuracies there.
...two days after the raids, British Air Commodore Grierson told journalists
"First of all they [Dresden and similar towns] are the centres to which evacuees are being moved. They are centres of communications through which traffic is moving across to the Russian Front, and from the Western Front to the East, and they are sufficiently close to the Russian Front for the Russians to continue the successful prosecution of their battle. I think these three reasons probably cover the bombing."
One of the journalists asked whether the principal aim of bombing of Dresden would be to cause confusion among the refugees or to blast communications carrying military supplies. Grierson answered that the primary aim was communications to prevent them moving military supplies, and to stop movement in all directions if possible. He then added in an offhand remark that the raid also helped destroying "what is left of German morale"
While I'll let you get away with calling Hamburg an industrial city, I must object that label to be put on Dresden. The only industries there where small home works, producing fine instruments like watches and optical devicies. Zeiss Ikon among others had their base in Dresden. Maybe the allied didn't want the Germans to take any more photoes.
Originally posted by snafu7700
so terrorists who intentionally target civilians are freedom fighters as long as it's jews they are killing? that's pretty much all i need to know about you.....and that kind of attitude is pretty much why the violence continues and will continue until there is no one left in the ME to kill or be killed.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Kind of explains why Israel is always the bad guy, while terrorist do the same thing Israel does is always good. Knowing about someones background can often lead to a good insight as to why they believe what they believe.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
Kind of explains why Israel is always the bad guy, while terrorist do the same thing Israel does is always good. Knowing about someones background can often lead to a good insight as to why they believe what they believe.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
Maronite Christians are descendant of Phoenicians.
My ancestors have been in the Middle East in Lebanon for over 4000 years...we won't be going anywhere anytime soon.
You have absolutely no clue about the ME and more then likely no connection to the ME unless its a religious connection of some sort.
Your opinion of me is totally irrelevant...
and just seeing what you type here is enough to tell me you have no clue as to what time it is.
Im just glad there are others who see the injustice and place their religious beliefs aside.
Had the Brits held on to their mandate till this time, you would be calling the Jews under their authority freedom fighters too as Im sure they would have also continued their attacks on Great Britain to this day.
The Brits were smart and knew what they were doing was wrong and pulled out.
Israel is a little slower it seems to get the hint they were giving themselves at one time.
There is a Jewish-inspired pathos to this movie that is difficult to describe, but very moving to watch. The acting is great, and the writing is unparalleled.
IMDB
What god would tell people to wipe out an entire race...I don't think that was my God speaking.
This nation will presumably be formed of Jewish Russians, Jewish Englishmen, Jewish Roumanians, Jewish Bulgarians, and Jewish citizens of all nations - survivors or relations of those who have fought or laid down their lives for the different countries which I have mentioned, at a time when the three years that they have lived through have united their outlook and thought more closely than ever with the countries of which they are citizens.
Zionism has always seemed to me to be a mischievous political creed, untenable by any patriotic citizen of the United Kingdom. If a Jewish Englishman sets his eyes on the Mount of Olives and longs for the day when he will shake British soil from his shoes and go back to agricultural pursuits in Palestine, he has always seemed to me to have acknowledged aims inconsistent with British citizenship and to have admitted that he is unfit for a share in public life in Great Britain, or to be treated as an Englishman. I have always understood that those who indulged in this creed were largely animated by the restrictions upon and refusal of liberty to Jews in Russia. But at the very time when these Jews have been acknowledged as Jewish Russians and given all liberties, it seems to be inconceivable that Zionism should be officially recognised by the British Government, and that Mr. Balfour should be authorized to say that Palestine was to be reconstituted as the "national home of the Jewish people". I do not know what this involves, but I assume that it means that Mahommedans and Christians are to make way for the Jews and that the Jews should be put in all positions of preference and should be peculiarly associated with Palestine in the same way that England is with the English or France with the French, that Turks and other Mahommedans in Palestine will be regarded as foreigners, just in the same way as Jews will hereafter be treated as foreigners in every country but Palestine. Perhaps also citizenship must be granted only as a result of a religious test.
I claim that the lives that British Jews have led, that the aims that they have had before them, that the part that they have played in our public life and our public institutions, have entitled them to be regarded, not as British Jews, but as Jewish
Britons. I would willingly disfranchise every Zionist. I would be almost tempted to proscribe the Zionist organisation as illegal and against the national interest. But I would ask of a British Government sufficient tolerance to refuse a conclusion which makes aliens and foreigners by implication, if not at once by law, of all their Jewish fellow-citizens.
3. I deny that Palestine is to-day associated with the Jews or properly to be regarded as a fit place for them to live in. The Ten Commandments were delivered to the Jews on Sinai. It is quite true that Palestine plays a large part in Jewish history, but so it does in modern Mahommendan history, and, after the time of the Jews, surely it plays a larger part than any other country in Christian history. The Temple may have been in Palestine, but so was the Sermon on the Mount and the Crucifixion. I would not deny to Jews in Palestine equal rights to colonisation with those who profess other religions, but a religious test of citizenship seems to me to be the only one admitted by those who take a bigoted and narrow view of one particular epoch of the history of Palestine, and claim for the Jews a position to which they are not entitled.
If my memory serves me right, there are three times as many Jews in the world as could possible get into Palestine if you drove out all the population that remains there now. So that only one-third will get back at the most, and what will happen to the remainder?
"a belief that Israel must have all of the promised land, including Jerusalem, to facilitate the second coming of the messiah."
(Those of you with an eye for conspiracy theories will note that one of the prime movers in this was Lord Rothschild, btw.)