It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
JERUSALEM - The deputy defense minister suggested Friday that Israel might be forced to launch a military strike against Iran's disputed nuclear program — the clearest statement yet of such a possibility from a high-ranking official
news.yahoo.com...
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
Well, no surprise here. I have always maintained that the Israelis are dead serious about no nukes in Iran- US backed or not. I have a hunch that with the Dems sweeping Congress, Israel may feel that US support may be less once they are in power. I wouldn't doubt that Israel is trying to send the message to Iran that no matter what happens in the US, and who is in power, it doesn't change the fact that Iran will have to contend with Israeli resolve.
As it is now, I believe Israel has put up with the threat of annihilation only because they know Iran does not have the capacity to do it completely. Iran with 5 large enough nukes could do it, and many believe that they already have the delivery mechanisms in place, at least for smaller nukes. But with the recent Syrian-Iranian defense pact, why wouldn't Iran just get them into Syria for a launch? That is particularly dangerous, because the distance could be reduced to so little, that it would allow maximum nuclear payloads, with near zero warning/reaction time.
And so one might ask well why would they be any more concerned about Iran working with Russia and the IAEA towards a peaceful nuclear energy program? Well, it appears that diplomatic pressure didn't have the desired effect on North Korea- they just tested a nuke, despite all the warnings and diplomatic efforts.
And who knows what Iran may have developed, or will develop secretly? Israel continually makes it clear that they are NOT going to find out the hard way.
So how would Israel accomplish limited strikes on Iran, with such a great distance to cover? Many swear the US would have to be involved, but I am not so convinced. I believe Israel could just barely pull it off unassisted by flying through one of several possible routes:
Consider that Israel is going to have some of the best pilots on the planet, who with the most resolute orders would even, I believe, shoot down any aircraft attempting to intercept them. They'd probably fly extremely low, avoiding radar, and refueling is a major concern. A couple of those routes could be flown without in air refuels, as fuel capacities for some of their F16's can handle the job, allbeit with minimal deviations or combat. Then there is also the possibilty of Israel attacking by submarine positioned in the Persian Gulf. A combination of both would likely be the most effective: planes hit the closest targets in northern Iran, and subs take care of everything else.
What is troublesome to me is that Iran would gladly sacrifice so many innocent lives to achieve Israel's total destruction, not to mention the damage to the environment. Depending on which way the wind happens to be blowing that day, think of all the countries that could be affected by the fallout of such an Iranian nuclear attack. Hell, their own allies Hezbollah in Lebanon could pay a deadly price, as well as Syrians, Jordanians, Saudis, and Egyptians. But hey it's all worth it, of course, because Allah is Great.
Originally posted by jtma508
Unless I'm missing something there's no way Israel could do this without refueling. The southern route is the shortest and I'm estimating that at about 3,500mi round-trip. The F-16 ferry range is about 2,000mi. Refuel in Iraq perhaps?
Originally posted by jtma508
Unless I'm missing something there's no way Israel could do this without refueling. The southern route is the shortest and I'm estimating that at about 3,500mi round-trip. The F-16 ferry range is about 2,000mi. Refuel in Iraq perhaps?
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Democrats are even talking of a draft.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
Dems to bring draft?
Anyway, republicans want draft too... there are like democrats.
Originally posted by ThePieMaN
When they struck Osirak they had to convert those jets into flying Fuel tanks, and they made it back with just enough fuel.
This idea of "pre-emptive" strike is hogwash. Its terrorism plain and simple.
To follow this country whose judgement is clouded in hatred and fear is to parallel ourselves to their way of life living under high security and the constant threat of retribution for their acts against the innocent. This is not the way.
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
Where are Democrats talking about a draft?
I think if there was a draft process supported by most democrats, especially the leaders, the Republicans would have used it against them during the election.
And if this were true, the Congress and Senate would be red once again.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
I wouldn't mind seeing your backup for that statement. Very little is known about exactly how those attacks were pulled off, especially the ingress and egress routes. It was my understanding that those remain secret to this day.
Tell me PieMan, if someone threatened to kill you and your entire family, not once, not twice, but multiple times- and you knew they were just waiting to get a big enough gun to do it- and you went to the authorities- and nothing they did seemed to make a difference- and you were pretty sure that once they got that gun that they would indeed kill you and your entire family- would you wait until he tried before you went and took that sucka out? When you know he hates you deeply, and desires nothing more than your total annihilation?
Because this is a very small, and almost inconsequential parity to the real problem Israel faces with Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon. They are being threatened with ANNIHILATION man. What part of this do you not understand? It changes things man. It changes things from being illegal. It changes things from being unrighteous. It changes things when a country is publicly declaring that they will kill every last woman and child in your country, as soon as they have the weapons to do it.
Well, I'd be curious as to what YOUR way is PieMan. Oops, sorry, it appears that you are no longer there because- well, you failed to act and the other guy got the big gun he needed. Unless Israel is willing to relocate the whole entire country, (just ain't gonna happen), this problem is not going away anytime soon. Unfortunate, but IMO, true. If there IS a better way, then someone better find it. Fast.
Disappointed that U.S. allies haven't joined the embargo against Iran, lobbyists for Israel are urging the U.S. Congress to adopt legislation that could punish foreign companies that do business with Iran. One of Israel's top strategic priorities is to prevent Tehran from getting the bomb.
Originally posted by XphilesPhan
well if you bothere dto finish reading it....rangel re-introduced the bill saying "we may have to draft whether we like it or not"