Another disgusting repugnant BUSTED

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 10:38 AM
link   
HOUSTON, 6:02 p.m. CST November 12, 2003 - Radio talk show host Jon Matthews was indicted on one count of indecency with a child Wednesday, News2Houston reported.

"Under the occasion contained in the indictment in early October, Mr. Matthews exposed his genitals to a child (a person under 17)," said John Healy, the Fort Bend County district attorney. "We have not alleged any contact."

www.msnbc.com...

These are your leaders, repugnants. These are the animals that speak for you. Maybe this guy should get "counseling" like Rush.

Thse people make me sick.




posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 10:39 AM
link   
um... a talk show host?

-sheesh-

You're mixing entertainers with politicians aren't you?



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 10:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by William
um... a talk show host?

-sheesh-

You're mixing entertainers with politicians aren't you?


He is like Rush, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, Michael Savage....a mouthpiece for repugnant policy.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 10:46 AM
link   
users.aol.com...

Over ahundred democratic scandals in the past 10 years. Dead jane doe's, the assassination of over 100 americans by janet reno and bill clinton, the use of drug money by hillary clinton to fund her senate campaign, and much, much more!

[Edited on 13-11-2003 by goregrinder]



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 10:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by ColonelHe is like Rush, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, Michael Savage....a mouthpiece for repugnant policy.

Entertainers all. Not policy makers. Players in the game, just like you. (D'oh! Did I just say Colonel was like Ann Coulter! OMG!)



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 10:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by William

Originally posted by ColonelHe is like Rush, Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, Michael Savage....a mouthpiece for repugnant policy.

Entertainers all. Not policy makers. Players in the game, just like you. (D'oh! Did I just say Colonel was like Ann Coulter! OMG!)


They are in fact, entertainers but they also influence, to a great degree, political discourse and substantiate the lies of the repugnant policy makers to the minions. Don't deny the obvious. There are 20 million Rush dittoeheads out there to prove you wrong.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:03 AM
link   
I thought you kept yourself on track, colonel? A Liberal, anti-semite entertainer known as Michael Jackson, supposedly mollested more than one child. :w:hehe, keep chuggin.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by goregrinder
I thought you kept yourself on track, colonel? A Liberal, anti-semite entertainer known as Michael Jackson, supposedly mollested more than one child. :w:hehe, keep chuggin.


This is just ridiculous. Michael Jackson???? Gimme a break.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:10 AM
link   
He contributed large amounts of money to Klinton, has reached no doubt more people than the radio host in question, and mollested numerous children. What's the differecnce? :w:



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by goregrinder
I thought you kept yourself on track, colonel? A Liberal, anti-semite entertainer known as Michael Jackson, supposedly mollested more than one child. :w:hehe, keep chuggin.



Hm. didn't know MJ hated jews....



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by goregrinder
He contributed large amounts of money to Klinton, has reached no doubt more people than the radio host in question, and mollested numerous children. What's the differecnce? :w:


Corporations contribute to both parties but they aren't spokesmen for either party. Neither would I say Ted Nuggent was a spokesman for the repugnants---even tho he is one.

You're reaching.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by goregrinder
I thought you kept yourself on track, colonel? A Liberal, anti-semite entertainer known as Michael Jackson, supposedly mollested more than one child. :w:hehe, keep chuggin.


Is this supposed to offend Colonel because his artwork show's a black person. Is he supposed to be offended because Michael Jackson is what....black (I don't know)...liberal (who knows?) ..human (who knows?). Just trying to understand the cross-fire and its intent.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by Loki

Originally posted by goregrinder
I thought you kept yourself on track, colonel? A Liberal, anti-semite entertainer known as Michael Jackson, supposedly mollested more than one child. :w:hehe, keep chuggin.



Hm. didn't know MJ hated jews....


That's speculation.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:15 AM
link   


You're reaching.


This TOPIC isn't reaching??? Come on man, just pointing out that people on both sides of the agenda have commited disgusting acts, you brought an entertainer into it, so i decided to.

And loso, please read the posts and stop pointing fingers. Jackson is a flaming liberal, who mollested children.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:16 AM
link   
Loki, look it up. It isn't speculation, it was in the lyrics of one of his songs. There was a huge scandal around it.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:18 AM
link   

Originally posted by goregrinder



You're reaching.


This TOPIC isn't reaching??? Come on man, just pointing out that people on both sides of the agenda have commited disgusting acts, you brought an entertainer into it, so i decided to.

And loso, please read the posts and stop pointing fingers. Jackson is a flaming liberal, who mollested children.


Jackson is not political. Jackson is not a mouthpiece for a liberal agenda. I don't know if he moleseted children.

This old repugnant mouthpiece DID tho. Why are you even defending the repugnant with:

"Well, you guys do it too!"

Just like a repugnant.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:21 AM
link   
Like i have tried to say, not defending him, they should castrate the piece of # and put a bullet in his head. Just trying to show you people of all political affiliations do unredeemable things.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:39 AM
link   
Colonel,
This type of behaviour transcends political boundries, whether liberals or conservatives, demos or repubs. This needs to be the focus, not using it as fodder against republicans because it could of easily have been a democrat. Would you post such things if the shoe was on the other foot?

In all honesty, this is just plain sick and I hope they nail him to the wall (no pun intended).



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:46 AM
link   

Originally posted by goregrinder
Loki, look it up. It isn't speculation, it was in the lyrics of one of his songs. There was a huge scandal around it.



Oh, great. It's in his lyrics. So, now, If I go listen to a ghetto boys song, they must all be gangstas, and it's gotta feel really good to be one?

AND Eminem is of course the man who has killed his wife, had gay sex with Dr. Dre, and Has had a 23 car pileup?

Listen, goregrinder. Sometimes, lyrics are put into songs just to illicit a reaction. In Eminem's case, it's anger, in Brian McKnight's case, it's love. People make their music, and true or not (usually not) their lyrics simply are their to get a reaction. Thats ALL.

If michael jackson DID say that...I'm not sure he meant it. You can't label someone by what they sing about.



posted on Nov, 13 2003 @ 11:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by Colonel

Originally posted by goregrinder



You're reaching.


This TOPIC isn't reaching??? Come on man, just pointing out that people on both sides of the agenda have commited disgusting acts, you brought an entertainer into it, so i decided to.

And loso, please read the posts and stop pointing fingers. Jackson is a flaming liberal, who mollested children.


Jackson is not political. Jackson is not a mouthpiece for a liberal agenda. I don't know if he moleseted children.

This old repugnant mouthpiece DID tho. Why are you even defending the repugnant with:

"Well, you guys do it too!"

Just like a repugnant.


My My,

you have no idea what you are talking about do you. You are so full of hate for anyone who disagrees with your own misguided ideas that you refuse to see what is apparent. The fact that someone molested a child, commited a crime, or did anything that warrants discussion on this topic, does not mean it has anything to do with politics. You should use your head more. You dont even know what the words you use mean. Try starting a thread like this differently to accurately depict what happened. "Another Disgusting PERSON busted" It has nothing to do with politics.





new topics
top topics
 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join