It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Previous estimates of Iraq deaths held that 45,000 to 50,000 have been killed in the nearly 44-month-old conflict, according to partial figures from Iraqi institutions and media reports. No official count has ever been available.
Moderate Sunni Muslims, meanwhile, threatened to walk away from politics and pick up guns, while the Shiite-dominated government renewed pressure on the United States to unleash the Iraqi army and claimed it could crush violence in six months.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
No, instead they fought to protect the very dictator and country originally oppressing them. Imagine that.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
150,000 lives. Our government decided that it was better for 150,000 people to have no chance at life and kill them, than to let them live at all under the rule of a dictator. Now my question is, if those 150,000 people would have decided for themselves that death was better than living under Saddam's rule, then why weren't there constant, repeated attempts at bringing him down by thousands of his own people willing to die for the cause? No, instead they fought to protect the very dictator and country originally oppressing them. Imagine that.
Originally posted by rizla
The study published in the Lancet was an independent study while the Iraqi Health Minister is a...politician. Hmmm. I wonder which one is the most independent...
The survey quoting 650,000 deaths in Iraq did not use questionable methodology. Do you have links to back this up, or you merely expressing a 'gut feeling'?
I saw an interview with a British soldier on TV. He was commenting on Blair's comment about Saddam's sentence and that he (Blair) was against the death penalty on principle. The British soldier scoffed at that, and said it was 'rich coming from' Blair after Iraq.
[edit on 10-11-2006 by rizla]
The Johns Hopkins researchers argue their "cluster sample" approach is more reliable than counting dead bodies, given the obstacles preventing more comprehensive fieldwork in the violent and insecure conditions of Iraq.
"I stand by the figure that a lot of innocent people have lost their life... and that troubles me, and it grieves me," Mr Bush told reporters at the White House.
"Six-hundred thousand or whatever they guessed at is just... it's not credible," Mr Bush said.
The researchers spoke to nearly 1,850 families, comprising more than 12,800 people in dozens of 40-household clusters around the country.
Health minister Ali al-Shemari gave his new estimate of 150,000 to reporters during a visit to Vienna, Austria. He later said that he based the figure on an estimate of 100 bodies per day brought to morgues and hospitals — though such a calculation would come out closer to 130,000 in total.
Our government decided that it was better for 150,000 people to have no chance at life and kill them, than to let them live at all under the rule of a dictator.