It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by reaper2
I believe marriage was and is mainly a religous affair, and spiritual one.
I dont understand why guy's would want to get married when it is clear these kinds of unions are a abomination to god.
To be married is simply religous purposes or the added security for raising a family. ijust don't get it why do gay's want the blessing from a god who does not love them.
And if the ceremony has nothing to do with god, then why do it when most men have to be dragged to the alter, there are also no kids involved so why? both partners probably work if not then why and how do you devide the assets when one has contrbuted more than the other.
They are beeter of cohabiting as they always have.
Originally posted by SkyWay
Again, I must make a distinction between those who are unable to have children and those who choose not to have children even though they can. The first are innocent, the second type are, by choice, aborting the primary purpose of marriage.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by SkyWay
Again, I must make a distinction between those who are unable to have children and those who choose not to have children even though they can. The first are innocent, the second type are, by choice, aborting the primary purpose of marriage.
Who are you to say what the primary purpose of marriage is? It's obviously not the primary purpose of MY marriage. Who are you to blanket every marriage with your perception of it?
Even if I could have children, we choose not to have children. We could have adopted. We don't like children. We don't want children. Yet, we wanted to be married. It was a choice. And regardless what your religion says about it, the LAW says we can be married. Children are NOT a requirement of marriage by law.
My point is that you have a certain idea of marriage and that's fine. But I don't think you have the right to force everyone to think in the same terms about marriage as you do.
Originally posted by SkyWay
This is not what I say....it's what I believe.
You have freewill to decide for yourself what to think and do.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
You say gay people shouldn't marry because they can't procreate. Well, I can't procreate either and it's ok with you that I'm married, isn't it? I'm just saying that your argument falls completely apart if you follow it for 2 seconds.
Originally posted by RRconservative
I never undersood the big deal about Gay Marriage. If a gay man wants to marry a gay woman, I don't see why anyone would have a problem with this. In fact there is no law or state amendment against this. This is called Equal Rights.
The problem comes in when a gay man or woman wants to have Special Rights to marry another gay man or woman. Emphasis on special rights.
Originally posted by SkyWay
But the critical difference between you and homosexuals is that you are UNABLE to have children, whereas they CHOOSE an arrangement that doesn't produce children.
Originally posted by SkyWay
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
You say gay people shouldn't marry because they can't procreate. Well, I can't procreate either and it's ok with you that I'm married, isn't it? I'm just saying that your argument falls completely apart if you follow it for 2 seconds.
But the critical difference between you and homosexuals is that you are UNABLE to have children, whereas they CHOOSE an arrangement that doesn't produce children. If a person is born deaf, that person cannot be blamed if they don't produce music, but if a person has good hearing and is blessed with musical talent, yet wastes that talent and CHOOSES not to produce beautiful music, that would be a tragic wasted capability and a golden opportunity passed by...a loss to themselves and to the world. Children unborn are an immeasurabley greater loss to the world.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
And whether or not gay people are married, they still cannot produce children. I mean, even if they don't marry, they still cannot produce children. You would punish them by not allowing them to marry because they're not capable of having kids???
Originally posted by Kacen
Umm, if they are gay, they won't have kids whether they marry or not, so if they get married it makes no difference. So why should you care?