It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by seagull
Oh, pishtosh. God's got better things to do than worry about whether two people who love each other get married. Marriage is about the union of two halves of the same soul in the eyes of God. Male/Male, Female/Female, Male/Female; it matters not in the least.
As I said, Gods got more important things to worry about.
Just out of curiousity, why an abomination? Marriage isn't, or shouldn't be anyway, just about procreation. It's about the joining of two people in a spiritual union that transends mere gender.
[edit on 9-11-2006 by seagull]
Originally posted by seagull
I'll concede that point. However, marriage isn't merely about procreation. There is much more to it than that. If that's all there was to marriage, I'd have married years ago. There has to be more than that to a marriage, otherwise what's the point?
Originally posted by seagull
It is discrimination, true. But the voters seem to support it.
Originally posted by reaper2
I believe marriage was and is mainly a religous affair, and spiritual one.
I dont understand why guy's would want to get married ...
To be married is simply religous purposes or the added security for raising a family.
And if the ceremony has nothing to do with god, then why do it when most men have to be dragged to the alter, there are also no kids involved so why?
They are beeter of cohabiting as they always have.
Originally posted by SkyWay
Marriage is the fulfillment of the first commandment that God gave to humanity to be fruitful and multiply.
Originally posted by reaper2
Gays connot multiply
why should they even try to get married. ?????
Originally posted by SkyWay
However, procreation is the most crucial part of its purpose.
Originally posted by seagull
Benevolent Heretic. I didn't say they were right. I said the majority of voters felt that way...I'm in no way agreeing with them. People should be able to marry the ones they love. Simply that.
Originally posted by seagull
It is discrimination, true. But the voters seem to support it.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by SkyWay
Marriage is the fulfillment of the first commandment that God gave to humanity to be fruitful and multiply.
I can't have kids. Are you saying that I (a straight woman) shouldn't be allowed to be married to my husband?
Originally posted by SkyWay
However, procreation is the most crucial part of its purpose.
NOT TO ME!!! In fact, procreation has NOTHING to do with my marriage. Who are you to tell me that because I can't and don't want to have children that I shouldn't be married?
Originally posted by SkyWay
I'm not telling you that. All I said is that the MAIN purpose of marriage is to have children and care for them until they are able to care for themselves. But this is not the same as telling you that because you can't have children that you shouldn't be married.
[edit on 9-11-2006 by SkyWay]
Originally posted by marg6043
Originally posted by SkyWay
I'm not telling you that. All I said is that the MAIN purpose of marriage is to have children and care for them until they are able to care for themselves. But this is not the same as telling you that because you can't have children that you shouldn't be married.
[edit on 9-11-2006 by SkyWay]
Hum that is a point, that seems to be also in the minds of the religious rights . . . but it doesn't make sénce.
When couples man and woman marry but decide that they will not have children.
My brother and new wife are in that group, while my brother has a son by previous marriage his new brided have no children and want none.
My neighbors across the street has been marry for 22 years and never wanted children.
So it kind of sounds lame don't you think? When the issue of children is by choice?