GM or Not to GM, Which?, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 19-11-2006 @ 06:55 AM by Long Lance
HorrahUSMC,

GMOs do not, as a rule produce higher yields and while it might be true that lots of people are currently eating GMOs, they wouldn't need to if farmers grew conventional crops.

GMOs displaced normal crops and now you claim we can't get rid of them? well how did we arrive at our present condition in the first place?



www.psrast.org...


Last week, Nature magazine reported the results of one of the biggest agricultural experiments ever conducted (2). A team of Chinese scientists had tested the key principle of modern rice-growing - planting a single, high-tech variety across hundreds of hectares - against a much older technique: planting several breeds in one field. They found, to the astonishment of the farmers who had been drilled for years in the benefits of "monoculture", that reverting to the old method resulted in spectacular increases in yield. Rice blast - a devastating fungus which normally requires repeated applications of poison to control - decreased by 94 per cent. The farmers planting a mixture of strains were able to stop applying their poisons altogether, while producing 18 per cent more rice per acre than they were growing before.




then re-read the thread ffs feofe you come off even more ignorant, i guess your name is a real advertisement.

edit: preserved post in full glory:

Originally posted by HoorahUSMC
I like this, people who think waiting 20 minutes for food to arrive is a bad sign of things to come are telling starving people "Hey, you're not me, die."

CHina, Africa, and parts of Mexico are reliant on GM crops. Without them they wouldn't be able to grow enough food. So, if you want to get rid of GM foods be prepared to kill off about 1 billion or so people. Oh sure they're just blacks or asians or mexicans, as long as you can order a vegetarian pizza at 3am who cares? Right? Let those African villages starve to death since organic crops are raped by the insect and other wildlife and even if they weren't produce less then most GM crops of the same type. WHat? Have them buy the same herbicides and pesticides we use in America? If they had that kind of money they wouldn't be worried about growing enough food they'd buy it.

Hell, China wouldn't have the population it does now if it wasn't for GM foods. The GM rice produces, sometimes 10x, more rice then normal non-GM foods. So if you want to commit genocide on the Chinese go ahead, remove GM products.

Know what, are you the KKK? Neo Nazos? GOP? Hitler's plan called for troops to round people up and kill them, your way not only costs less it kills more! Good job people, committing genocide on a billion+ people so you can buy raw foods at the ConAgro store for 30 bucks a pound.


have you read the link by now? how Chinese scientists found out that variety greatly increases yield and resitance? kind of ironic if you ask me, so, before you go on i'd like to see references to your claims.

[edit on 19-11-2006 by Long Lance]


reply posted on 22-11-2006 @ 10:31 AM by soficrow
Good thread, great discussion. Thanks all.

A bit late, but I thought I'd fix the link from the opening post -
GM Foods at a Glance

One question - anyone notice how the word "organic" is gaining/has gained a new connotation - and it's become a dirty word?

How about we fight back, and call it real food?

Maybe?

...It's another phony "debunking" marketing campaign. Check out how it works here.

Time for us to debunk the debunkers, imo.





reply posted on 22-11-2006 @ 10:39 AM by SkipShipman
Originally posted by dave_54
GM products have the promise of growing more food on less land, using less water, less fertilizer, and less pesticides. This means less natural land cover converted to crops and more land left in natural preserves. This means less non-point runoff from ag lands. This means small family farmers can make a living and not be forced by economics to sell to agri-business factory farms.

GM is an environmental win-win all the way around.

The only ones that oppose GM technology are the organic food industries that stand to lose millions of dollars in profits. They are more concerned about money than the environment.


First of all this industry position is self assertion, the unmasked position is proprietary seeds and monopoly profits. Can you imagine the arrogance of corporations patenting
Basmati Rice rice, then turning around and trying to license its use to farmers in India? That actually happened from Texan company RiceTec. Do you like not being able to save your own seeds? This patent issue is the problem, and what companies use to exploit farmers around the world. It is a power play to control the food supply by legal trickery.

What you have with proprietary GM foods is lower yields and problems. The trouble with GM crops if not for lower prices for farmers is also higher prices for herbicides and other entanglements.

Will people get it once and for all that this is not about farmers but about profits for a terrible product?


reply posted on 22-11-2006 @ 10:44 AM by SpeakerofTruth
Originally posted by soficrow

One question - anyone notice how the word "organic" is gaining/has gained a new connotation - and it's become a dirty word?

How about we fight back, and call it real food?

Maybe?

...It's another phony "debunking" marketing campaign. Check out how it works
here.




I have no idea why organic has become a "dirty" word. I think most of it is due to the perspective that the GM corporations what the general,and ignorant, populace to believe.

As far as "debunkers" go, emphasis on quotations, what has a "debunker" ever actually debunked. It has been my experience that "debunkers" generally,not alwas, generally show little to no evidence against anything. What I get from most "debunkers," especially those that frequent these sites, are fallacies,a deny and deny again mentality, and arguments from emotion to defend their long held status quo perspectives.


reply posted on 23-11-2006 @ 03:21 AM by Alikospah
"4) Babies are born with all the taste buds they will ever have, and those taste buds have decreased sensitivity as we get older. Thus, older ATS members may find it more difficult to notice real taste differences in produce because of the normal aging process."


Some elderly do lose the sharpness of taste but not all. I can sure taste sweet corn and don't like it. I like "field corn" and "Wild Oats" has it canned. I have to say, most of the younger folk, the majority in fact, don't know what real food tastes like, they've never tasted it.

As for "organic" food being put down as "whacko", I'll eat it before I'll eat "Frankeinfood" which is literally what that GM "food" is.
At this moment, I'm eating a real Idaho russet potato, the real thing and I can sure taste it, its the potato of my childhood and its as good as ever. It tastes wonderful and gives that "high", the feeling of deep satisfaction after. The Frankeinfood doesn't have that little extra pleasure of good food.
I am almost activist on this as our food in recent years has been changed in taste and texture. And is it really food, does it sustain us? I was becoming ill from a condition and now that I'm getting real food, I'm recovering.
Corn with the texture of styrofoam, tomatoes with rinds, rice that has to be cooked to glue before its soft thru', and okra that tastes like cucumbers, and on and on. Worse, GN isn't stable. Biotechs call it "science" but its playing with fire. 3rd and 4th generation foods have morphed from what they were supposed to be.

I appreciate the links that have been included in the posts, GM is practically hidden from us, its not a good thing and they know it or it would be out in the open.

Get involved with Seed Savers, there are several out there. You get seed from them, plant and grow it, then send them more seed that you've harvested. Grow a tomato plant in a plastic bucket you can get free at grocers' bakery. (Cleaning them is fun). Gather good soil in the woods where deciduous trees grow, that is the richest soil. A little peat moss, compost and I use composted horse doo (or you can sterilize it in a slow oven, 8 hours at 200 degrees) Good rich soil makes strong plants that can fight off the pests and diseases. "Extreme gardening" has arrived.

Demand labeling in our stores, groceries do listen. When they see their customers not buying and complaining, it gets heard all the way back to the farm. In the meantime, try Wild Oates or Whole Foods. They're nation wide and have fresh, lush produce, a far cry from the little organic store with wilted, shopworn produce but the little shops were the pioneers, don't forsake them, buy their eggs at least.

Don't just talk about it, do something! Speak out. Go where you know the good stuff is and tell your grocer you're doing it. You can save a farm and the farmer, the stay and staff of our land.


reply posted on 27-11-2006 @ 10:17 AM by Long Lance
Source
The first of the studies, conducted by Russian scientist Irina Ermakova, showed that an astounding 55% of the offspring of rats fed on GM soya died within three weeks of birth, compared with only 9% in the control group (1). The second, conducted by Manuela Malatesta and colleagues in the Universities of Pavia and Urbino in Italy, showed that mice fed on GM soya experienced a slowdown in cellular metabolism and modifications to liver and pancreas (2). And the third study, conducted by CSIRO in Australia, showed that the introduction of genes from a bean variety into a GM pea led to the creation of a novel protein which caused inflammation of the lung tissue of mice (3). So serious was the damage that the research was halted, and stocks of the GM pea have been destroyed.
The developers have now made a commitment that the "rogue" variety willnever be marketed.

These studies, all revealed in the scientific literature within thepast few weeks, have caused widespread alarm throughout the world, sincetwo of them suggest that GM soya (used in a large number of foods) mightbe very dangerous, and since they appear to confirm the findings of Dr Arpad Pusztai and Dr Stanley Ewen, whose paper on physiological changesin rats fed on GM potatoes caused a worldwide sensation in 1999 (4).
The authors were given the full "shoot the messenger" treatment; they were widely vilified by the scientific community, and following an intervention from the office of Prime Minister Tony Blair Dr Pusztai was sacked, his research team was dismantled, and his funding stopped. The Ewen/Pusztai research has never been repeated, let alone extended, for fear that their results will also be replicated. And there has never been a comprehensive human feeding trial involving GM food.


alternate link


Source
Unstable genes make accurate safety testing impossible. It also may explain some of the many problems reported about GM foods. For example, nearly 25 farmers in the US and Canada say that certain GM corn varieties caused their pigs to become sterile, have false pregnancies, or give birth to bags of water. A farmer in Germany claims that a certain variety of GM corn killed 12 of his cows and caused others to fall sick. And Filipinos living next to a GM cornfield developed skin, respiratory, and intestinal symptoms and fever, while the corn was pollinating. The mysterious symptoms returned the following year, also during pollination, and blood tests on 39 of the Filipinos showed an immune response to the Bt toxin—created by the GM corn.





just curious: what will it take to make pro-GMers either question my links or start having doubts?

[edit on 27-11-2006 by Long Lance]



reply posted on 29-11-2006 @ 09:19 PM by swimmer
2005, a Scary Year for Genetically Engineered Crops

By Jeffrey M. Smith
Author of the international bestseller Seeds of Deception

Genetically modified(GM)crops were introduced 10 years ago, but 2005 saw plenty of evidence that the technology was introduced long before the science was ready. Here are some of last year’s highlights, so to speak.

At a conference in October, a leading scientist from the Russian Academy of Sciences reported that more than half (55.6%) of the offspring of rats fed GM soy died within three weeks. By contrast, only 9% of rats died whose mothers were fed non-GM soy. The study is preliminary, but the American Academy of Environmental Medicine asked the NIH to immediately repeat it. [1]

In June, a German court ordered Monsanto to make a study public, in which rats fed GM corn developed kidney inflammation, altered blood cell counts and organ lesions. These and other changes suggested possible allergies, infections, toxins, anemia or blood pressure problems. The rats were fed corn genetically engineered to produce a pesticide called Bt-toxin. A French expert who reviews GM safety assessments for the government says that these and other studies indicate that Bt crops create reactions similar to chemical pesticides. Monsanto, however, was able to convince regulators to overlook the findings using arguments that were widely criticized as unscientific.[2]

In November, a 10-year, $2 million GM pea project in Australia was abandoned when the peas were found to create immune responses in mice. The results, which indicate that the peas might create serious allergic reactions in people, were discovered only after scientists employed advanced tests that have never been used for evaluating GM food. If those peas had been studied in the normal way, they could have been approved. The findings suggest that undetected problems may be common in GM crops on the market.[3]

Medical reports from India say that farm workers handling Monsanto’s GM cotton developed moderate to serious allergic reactions, forcing some to the hospital. There were also reports that numerous animals died after eating the Bt cottonseed.[4]

The Indian government confirmed that Bt cotton’s disastrous yields cost millions. One state even kicked out Monsanto, after they refused to compensate farmers’ losses. Tragically, hundreds of debt-ridden cotton farmers committed suicide.[5]

Monsanto was fined by the US Justice Department for bribing up to 140 Indonesian officials over several years, trying to get Bt cotton approved.[6] But widespread crop failure had left farmers in ruins there too, so even the bribes didn’t work. [7]

A three-year UK study showed that GM crops damage biodiversity and threaten birds and bees.[8] Another study surprised scientists when GM crops cross pollinated with a distant relative.[9] And some Indian farmers found that after planting GM cotton, their fields became sterile and could not support subsequent crops.[10]

According to USDA statistics, much more Roundup herbicide is used due to Monsanto’s Roundup Ready GM plants. Roundup was found to be far more toxic to humans and animals than previously thought. [11] Furthermore, its over use has resulted in the proliferation of herbicide-tolerant weeds in the US.[12]

Contamination was also a big issue.

www.responsibletechnology.org...
Pages: <<  1    2    3  >>    ^^TOP^^



Lake Vostok Antarctica: breakthrough imminent.
  Posted 10 days ago with 175 member flags
Sky Sounds 1/25/2012 Atlanta, GA Personal Video/Audio
  Posted 17 days ago with 146 member flags
Strange sounds warn us of incoming, and very soon...
  Posted 6 days ago with 134 member flags
Volcano in Iceland Erupting Alongside The Aurora Borealis (pics)
  Posted 7 days ago with 121 member flags
6 of the oldest trees from around the world.
  Posted 10 days ago with 108 member flags
West Coast USA: Pay Attention, Cascadia May Be Ready to Rupture
  Posted 8 days ago with 87 member flags
CONFIRMED: Global Warming \'Ended 15 Years Ago\'
  Posted 14 days ago with 75 member flags
Pictures from the Aurora lightshow
  Posted 18 days ago with 73 member flags