It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

America's Protest "bush disappointed"

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 11:35 PM
link   
If the mods want to move this go ahead.
.

today.reuters.com

Bush has said he was disappointed that the house has gone to the dems, who have gotten a seat in my state. The Senate is still held by republicans at the time of this posting. However, it doesnt look good for the GOP. They may loose the entire congress. I guess that throws out the "conspiracy" theorists
.

Anyway, I am not disappointed by this news and the results are similiar to the way I voted. I think the reasons are pretty clear.

With the Iraq war at a stalemate and the constant repealing of american rights such as habeas corpus, posse commitatus, etc the results are not really surprising.

Now, what will the Dems do to help us?

What do you all think?

mod edit: shortened link

[edit on 8-11-2006 by sanctum]




posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 11:38 PM
link   
Frankly I think the white house lost it because they were far too much in the back pocket of the Zionists and the pro-Israel lobby. It became apparent that a foreign power was controlling the US for its own interests and gladly some Americans woke up and demanded their country back.



posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 11:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by denythestatusquo
Frankly I think the white house lost it because they were far too much in the back pocket of the Zionists and the pro-Israel lobby. It became apparent that a foreign power was controlling the US for its own interests and gladly some Americans woke up and demanded their country back.



It was definately in the pocket of corporations which is unacceptable. I do think that the reasons for this, from what I am seeing, landslide victory among the Dems is due to a number of issues which have just piled up. Fuel costs, Economy (low-paying service jobs), stalemate in Iraq, etc.

They are also projecting that donald rumsfeld will step down
, I wonder why?



posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 11:49 PM
link   

Originally posted by denythestatusquo
It became apparent that a foreign power was controlling the US for its own interests ...


No really?





posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 11:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by XphilesPhan
Now, what will the Dems do to help us?

What do you all think?


Write more useless laws, under the careful guideance of multi-national corporate lawyers, for our protection.


I expect that beginning first thing tommarrow morning they will be mostly concerned with addessing pressing national issues like preparing thier negative campaign advertisements and collecting campaign donations for 2008.


[edit on 8-11-2006 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 12:08 AM
link   
In nothing we trust:
yeah I don't see a lot changing either frankly. I think the dems will be happy to put their supporters bums in paying seats for the next few years and then will plot non-stop to take back the white house. Mind you if the Reps don't brighten up quick it may happen and I expect to see Hilary as the next president.

HEIL HILLARY!



I still think she will make dubya look like a wimp.



[edit on 8-11-2006 by denythestatusquo]



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 12:08 AM
link   
I like your approach In nothing we trust, but what is the use if the alternative to electing pro Zionists are straight up Communists? I for one will not kneel and lick the boot of George Bush or kiss the arse of socialists who wish the demise of Western culture and the Constitution. Thank the maker for the South, because before it is all said and done, we will be last one's standing. If Sherman could not kill our culture I doubt Zion or allah will either.

vote Fascist!



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 12:10 AM
link   

Originally posted by shai hulud
I like your approach In nothing we trust, but what is the use if the alternative to electing pro Zionists are straight up Communists? I for one will not kneel and lick the boot of George Bush or kiss the arse of socialists who wish the demise of Western culture and the Constitution. vote Fascist!


You may be more correct than most here would be willing to admit based on decades of liberal programming of course. I will never trust a commie and I don't like being under the heel of elitists either.



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 12:35 AM
link   
Thanks, I think the elite have taken over and the out of touch are voting. I for one have seen my rights that my family have bled the fields for since Concord all but forgotten. I have seen my state's rights destroyed (albiet in line with the laws of the Constitution) since Appomattox. I think 27 of my bloodline is enough for this ungreatful country in the past wars. Some had a point, most did not, but this one will determine if we still have this cozy thing called the internet, or your wife and daughter are wearing a burka.

Deo Vindece!



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 12:38 AM
link   

Originally posted by denythestatusquo

You may be more correct than most here would be willing to admit based on decades of liberal programming of course. I will never trust a commie and I don't like being under the heel of elitists either.



there is little difference in the two systems, when they have been ripened. both are top down control, a few controlling the many. pyramid power. fascism and communism are nearly identical.

there is a movie called 'the lightbringers' which can be downloaded for free. it documents the masonic traipse through history, causing revolutions, and getting rich and powerful off of them. socialism and masonism are synonomous.
what the socialist agendas never tell you, is that things are NEVER equal. there will always be those who make decisions, and those who follow them. the EXTENT of the centralisation of power is the only difference between a healthy society, and a totalitarian nightmare.

the common modus operandi is to infiltrate powerful organisations, and then turn them to the purposes of the hidden hand from the inside out. i doubtthe jewish 'zionists' are really that jewish.

i wonder how much faith we should have in the cornerstone that the builders rejected. i think He would want us to help ourselves.



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 12:41 AM
link   
Its not healthy to have the president of the US in full control of congress, house, etc.
At least now we have some balance, it would appear.

This is going on the right track now. I'm pleased.


Editing to add too damn bad for Bush.


[edit on 8-11-2006 by dgtempe]



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 12:49 AM
link   
Fascism and communism identical? Well maybe to point. I myself have always been a nationalist. Oh, I have gotten out of line, God forbid I live amongst the same people that actually love their country. That would be racist, or ..what is the code word of the day? Well, I will probably be banned for that on a conspiracy board. I do quite agree with you though, it has become a bit stale, maybe it needs to mixed up a bit.



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 12:56 AM
link   
It is AWESOME that the Democrats have the House now............ it's about time too
, now Bush won't be able to push people around so easily to have his way
to make the house and congress pass anything Georgie's lil heart desires................ has come to an end !

Thank GOD for Democrats



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 01:13 AM
link   
YESSS I agree! Then life would be so empty without socialists. Thank God for Democrats. I want my taxes to go higher. I want my chidren to grow up and not even be able to speak Spanish, the national language. I have far too many guns to protect my family from a tyrannical government. Thank God for Democrats. I think we have been too hard on poor muslims that behead civilians. Bush is an idiot for taking the war too them an not at Starbucks over here....but then I have never seen a Starbucks because I am just an ignorant hick from Georgia....is that even a state? Someone should check on that while I clean my soon to be illegal guns all you socilaists only see in books overseas.



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 02:07 AM
link   
I don't know, I hope Democrat is the right choice. I just didn't want folks who are Bush friends in power. Enough with Bush mangling the constitution and his lies. Three towers went straight down on Sept 11, and we are led to believe airplanes did this. That's enough right there, alone, for mistrust in him.

But in the end, I don't know if "political party" really makes a difference. It's what the person actually does in office and the effects of his actions that really determines the value of the person. We shall see. We may see "more of the same" despite the Democratic "name tag." I certainly hope not.

I'm not really in support of political parties. I am in support of good, honest folks who are competent and do what is good for "all."

Troy



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 02:16 AM
link   

Originally posted by denythestatusquo

Originally posted by shai hulud
I like your approach In nothing we trust, but what is the use if the alternative to electing pro Zionists are straight up Communists? I for one will not kneel and lick the boot of George Bush or kiss the arse of socialists who wish the demise of Western culture and the Constitution. vote Fascist!


You may be more correct than most here would be willing to admit based on decades of liberal programming of course. I will never trust a commie and I don't like being under the heel of elitists either.



I just posted a new thread about this. Comments invited.

Freedom to Fascism in America - Vote fascist in 2008
www.abovetopsecret.com...

[edit on 8-11-2006 by In nothing we trust]



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 04:08 AM
link   
Bush has nobody but himself to blame for this loss. You can't ignore the issues up till the last week before the election, and then expect a furious flurry of campaign stops to win the day.



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 05:48 AM
link   
I agree with becky on this part, it was Bush's own fault that the GOP lost the House, and possibly split the Senate with the Democrats. Some of the key GOP seats that Bush backed, those were lost to the Democrats. Those include seats in the Senate held by Chafee of Rhode Island and Santorum of Pennsylvania just to name a couple. The races between Jim Webb and incumbent George Allen in Virginia might be over. Even though Webb has declared a victory, for some 'odd' reason, a recount is most certainly going to happen. Senator Conrad Burns seat is still up for grabs in Montana. Democratic challenger Jon Tester has a lead of 173,259 - compared to Senator Burns' 171,207 votes.



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 05:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by denythestatusquo
In nothing we trust:
yeah I don't see a lot changing either frankly. I think the dems will be happy to put their supporters bums in paying seats for the next few years and then will plot non-stop to take back the white house. Mind you if the Reps don't brighten up quick it may happen and I expect to see Hilary as the next president.

HEIL HILLARY!



I still think she will make dubya look like a wimp.



[edit on 8-11-2006 by denythestatusquo]




I agree wholeheartedly. I have been thinking since yesterday that this whole thing is a set up for Hillary. She could very well be our next president. I am sure Bush will look like a little kitty cat compared to that woman. Just wait.



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 07:13 AM
link   
Isn't the democrats gaining the majority only in january? So Bush can do something very stupid until then...



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join