Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Man Jailed for Putting Puppy in Oven

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 07:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by Funkydung
most people put live lobsters in boiling water(or do they slowly raise the heat)....imagine if he put the puppy in water and slowly raised the heat to boiling.....(what if he did it because he like the taste of boiled puppy meat? what would we do to him??? of course people dont boil lobsters out of spite or meanness but its still a living thing so whats the difference? money? eat what we tell you to eat? do what we tell you to do? where does it end? go have yourself a pig slaughter. boil a puppy or a lobster. this is a free country.


............. a puppy is a more complex living animal...it has a more complex nervous system, and very soft skin with lots of nerves....a lobster is made up of a hard shell with no nerve centers in it's skin, only some simple nerves inside it's body, and an almost liquid insides.

Have you ever seen a crab being cut in half when it is still alive?... there is just a guey liquid inside it's shell, in order to make it hard and succulent enough for humans to eat it, it has to be boiled/cooked.....

Crabs/lobsters and such do not have "nerves" in their skins, puppies do....and that man and whoever else thinks that "cooking a live puppy, or even killing a puppy to eat it"....are demented bastards...

[edit on 8-11-2006 by Muaddib]




posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 07:51 PM
link   
1Crisis, I'm not sure what it is about the term. It just does not sit right with me.

Handicap seems much more appropriate in my opinion. While the alternative comes across as derogatory. Just a personal perception.

Maybe I'm completely wrong on this, I'm open to hear an alternative view if someone has one.



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 07:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by chissler
1Crisis, I'm not sure what it is about the term. It just does not sit right with me.

Handicap seems much more appropriate in my opinion. While the alternative comes across as derogatory. Just a personal perception.

Maybe I'm completely wrong on this, I'm open to hear an alternative view if someone has one.


Well, I for one agree. I am not much on political correctness,but when it comes to that word,I'll make the exception.



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 08:07 PM
link   
Chissler, I do see how it can be offensive to someone since it is used in an offensive way.

The word "retard" is misused and is considered an insult, but do you care so much that I insult a man who throws puppies in ovens?



Main Entry: re·tard·ed
Pronunciation: ri-'tärd-&d
Function: adjective
: slow or limited in intellectual or emotional development : characterized by mental retardation dictionary.reference.com...


When I used this word, that definition above is exactly what I meant, I didn't consider it an insult at the time. See that is exactly what that word means, which is why I was confused.

Crisis

[edit on 8-11-2006 by 1Crisis]



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 08:32 PM
link   
Mental retardation is a clinical term. It means slow. It took the place of the previous clinical terms of moron, idiot and imbecile, because they entered the lay lexicon as pejoratives.

www.m-w.com...

www.m-w.com...

We use the terms developmental delay, too, but then delay is a synonym of retard.

We can carry out the prime directive here of politeness, without falling into the absurdity of political correctness.

"What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other word would smell as sweet."

--William Shakespeare. From Romeo and Juliet (II, ii, 1-2)



[edit on 2006/11/8 by GradyPhilpott]






top topics
 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join


Help ATS Recover with your Donation.
read more: Help ATS Recover With Your Contribution