posted on Nov, 6 2006 @ 07:53 PM
I am not sure if I am correct or not, but isn't a whistleblower someone who blows the whistle on something true? This doesn't seem like it would
require a "blowing" of the sources unless it was found to be untrue, and then it would be slander against the doctor.
Abortion is of course a divisive issue for many, but the bottom line is that if this doctor did not perform these abortions, and the destructive
comments led to loss of business that is by law legal, then the sources should be looked into in order to determine who exactly made up these stories
to attack a doctor.
Just my .02
Then again, it could be true, there are doctors that do all sorts of insane things, this would not be any different for a doctor that happens to
Point is, it seems that the sources wouldn't have to be investigated until the doctor himself, and his patients were investigated.