Republic of Quebec, page 1
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 1 times


reply posted on 20-10-2007 @ 04:33 AM by Arcticnull
There have been some very good points brought up in this post so far.
I would like to weigh in on the subject as well.
When this subject comes to light during a discussion I always take the time make the point that not every citizen of Quebec wishes to separate. The general conception, or misconception depending on your point of view, is that when a referendum takes place the percentage of votes represents the entire province. Some would say yes, that’s correct. I disagree though. Out of the people that I’ve had this debate with, including ultra staunch separatist, I ask them what about the First Nations which are in Quebec? They give me a very blank look as they have not thought about this metric in their separation.
I don’t believe that the average Canadian knows just how much money is funded to the First Nations and that funding is Federal, not provincial. The amount required to sustain the current agreements with First Nations would bankrupt Quebec with in the first 2 years of its seceding. Let’s not forget to mention the possibility of those First Nations actually mobilizing in a militia type force and start a war with in Quebec. I think something to do with a golf course and burial grounds rings a bell......
Quebec as a whole is funded by crown projects, crown corporations, crown sponsored corporations, federal tax money, NEP transfer payments, the list goes and I’m sure you get the point. Over all Quebec does not have a sustainable economic platform which would allow its self secede from Canada.
If there was a reality where Quebec did separate the Atlantic provinces would suffer greatly. That political outrage would then put pressure on the current government to invoke the War Measures Act and provide a militaristic response. FLQ crisis comes into play here. Some would argue that would lead to a civil war. Some would say that the U.S. would step in and annex provinces or those provinces left in the wake of the Quebec separation would request to become an American state. These are possibilities but I do not believe that this would happen.
Quebec beats the separation war drum and more money gets funneld into it. That’s all it is and that’s all it ever will be.
The argument that the preservation of the Francophone culture is the true matter at hand and that is why Quebec has a wish to separate. If this were the case I believe that during the time colinization between France and England this would have been sorted out in a much more violent and far reaching military fashion. In a way it was and we do have our history with upper and lower Canada as well. However, the preservation of one facet of Canadian society does not, in my opinion, outweigh the need to preserve our country as a whole.
From our pot smoking friends in British Columbia to our goofy Newfies out east we are a country because of every facet with in Canadian society. Quebec is no more valuable than P.E.I. or Saskatchewan, they are each valuable and contain history which makes Canada as whole.
Thank you all for your time,
Arcticnull


reply posted on 21-10-2007 @ 11:53 PM by The Walking Fox
reply to post by intrepid



Except that, having lived in Alaska, I would imagine that state has a much smaller population than any one of the Atlantic provinces.

Alaska and Hawai'i also happen to be to the United States what Quebec is to the rest of Canada. Both states have some pretty strong separatist leanings - the Hawai'ians have their monarchy groups, and Alaska has whole whole "leave us the hell alone" vibe going, plus the largest number of semi-sovereign Natives in the country.

The Maritime provinces enjoy more benefit from and closer relations to the rest of Canada, than Alaska and Hawai'i tend to towards the rest of the States.


reply posted on 22-10-2007 @ 08:39 AM by The Walking Fox
reply to post by ChrisF231



reply to post by xpert11


...And? What do you think is the cause of such a reactionary stance by either group? I tell you, either is likely more acceptable to you than what would happen if I were in charge. 'Course, I'm able to freely admit that putting me in charge is probably a bad idea

Anyway, my point is that comparing the potential separation of the Maritime provinces from the rest of Canada by an independent Quebec to the distance Hawai'i and Alaska have from the rest of the states, is flawed. Both are pretty independent on their own (even without sovereignity movements) and have developed as states in that condition. Both are quite self-sufficient as a result. Not so the Maritimes.

Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



Russian cops mistake nationalist rally for gay pride parade
  Posted 19 days ago with 4 member flags
Republicans in Arizona plan to nearly wipe out public unions
  Posted 11 days ago with 4 member flags
Tennessee threatens suit against man building boat with his son.
  Posted 2 days ago with 4 member flags
The CULT of Ron Paul
  Posted 15 days ago with 1 member flags
Rwanda deports Canadian Double-Parking Suspect
  Posted 18 days ago with 0 member flags