It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
Let me tell you something, the planes I fly are inherently stable in all axis, including pitch.
Shattered OUT...
[edit on 19-11-2006 by ShatteredSkies]
Originally posted by ShatteredSkies
Here's a question for you.
Define an unstable airframe.
Before we can even say something like "All aircraft are unstable only in pitch" we must first understand what it means for an aircraft to be inherently unstable.
Let me tell you something, the planes I fly are inherently stable in all axis, including pitch.
Shattered OUT...
[edit on 19-11-2006 by ShatteredSkies]
1. All aircraft are only unstable in pitch! You definitely do not want instabilities in roll and yaw, end of.
Originally posted by ShadowKeeper
Go do your homework first since you know nothing
Originally posted by kilcoo316
Shadowkeeper is 100% correct.
1. All aircraft are only unstable in pitch! You definitely do not want instabilities in roll and yaw, end of.
Originally posted by Ghost01
Not true! According to Paul Martin of the Lockheed Skunkworks, the F-117 Nighthawk is unstable in Pitch, Yaw, and Roll. The trick is in the design of the fly-by wire controls. If the controls are design correctly, an aircraft doesn't need to have Any natural stability to fly.
Tim
Originally posted by Ghost01
If the controls are design correctly, an aircraft doesn't need to have Any natural stability to fly.
The wing configuration made the craft inherently unstable. It could fly only with the constant corrections (up to 40 per second) provided by the computerized flight control system. The system was made up of three redundant digital computers backed up by three redundant analog computers