Originally posted by TheBandit795
Originally posted by Thomas Crowne
Uh, I beg to differ. The liberal movement in the U.S. is the result of Soviet work to undermine the U.S. They had a longterm goal, just weren't
economically strong enough to see it. I fear the victor of the Cold War may still die from its battle wounds, though, and their social undermining is
the injury that will bring us down
You know that's nonsense TC. That's the label the conservatives give the liberals.
Also, liberals care about and for the enviroment much more than conservatives. Conservatives cut down trees while they could use hemp to make clothes
and paper and save lots of trees...
Uh, no, its not nonsense. Its verifiable, as a matter of fact.
Yeah, I can see how much the liberals love the environment. They love it to death. Liberals have cost millions of critters their lives and
vegetation has gone up in smoke by the thousands of acres because of their feel good but stupid way of thinking. Shallow thinking, knee jerk
reaction, coupled with junk science is a bad combination.
There are some things about which I agree with you in regard to the environment, for example, the Everglades are slowly dying and drying up, and I
feel that is because of human interaction in the area, but I haven't noticed anybody fix the problem. Both sides have had a chance and neither have
done it.
One more time, to make sure you understand, the
not cutting done of trees has costed us more than had cutting and thinning. Ask Tom Daschel.
While he insured the rest of the nation couldn't do the right thing, he added a rider to exempt his state from the regulation in a piece of
legislation. There's a political liberal for you.
As far as hemp. I agree with you.