It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

FBI to release video from DoubleTree Hotel that will show plane hitting the Pentagon

page: 5
0
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 6 2006 @ 09:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

Well there is... most other major news stories witnesses are usually making money telling their stories to anyone who wants to interview them...

In this case nothing.... silence... no faces to go with the reports...



Here, get us some pictures.

John O'Keefe
Kirk Milburn
Michael DiPaula
Christine Peterson
Frank Probst
Joel Sucherman
Mike Walter
Fred Gaskins
Aydan Kizildrgli
Omar Campo
Donald "Tim" Timmerman
Steve Eiden
Father Stephen McGraw
Carla Thompson
Steve Anderson
Henry Ticknor
Sean Boger
Donald R. Bouchoux
Mike Dobbs
Mr. O'Brien
Albert Hemphill
Tony Terronez
Jose Velasquez
Deb and Jeff Anlauf
Gary Baur
Mickey Bell
Richard Benedetto
Judy Biggert
Chris Braman
Mr. Campo
James R. Cissell
Allen Cleveland
Scott P. Cook
Bob Dubill
Bobby Eberle
Penny Elgas
Bruce Elliott
Walker Lee Evey
Kim Flyler
Kat Gaines
Asework Hagos
Tom Hovis
Terrance Kean
D.S. Khavkin
Aydan Kizildrgli
William Lagasse
Liebner Lincoln
David Marra
Oscar Martinez
Elaine McCusker
Kenneth McClellan
William Middleton, Sr.
Terry Mitchell
Terry Morin
James Mosley
Christopher Munsey
Richard Myers
Vin Narayanan
Mary Ann Owens
Steve Patterson
Ms. Plaisted
Frank Probst
Lon Rains
Alfred S. Regnery
Rick Renzi
James S. Robbins
Meseidy Rodriguez
James Ryan
John Sayer
Don Scott
Tom Seibert
Noel Sepulveda
Jack Singleton
Mike Slater
Dewey Snavely
Jim Sutherland
Levi Stephens
Phillip Thompson
Henry Ticknor
Alan Wallace
Mike Walter
Keith Wheelhouse
Dave Winslow
Ian Wyatt
Madelyn Zakhem

Articles quoting witnesses:

"Our Plane Is Being Hijacked." Washington Post, 12 Sep 2001
"U.S. Under Attack: Your Eyewitness Accounts." BBC News, 14 Sep 2001
"Eyewitness at the Pentagon." Human Events, 17 Sep 2001
"A Defiant Recovery." The Retired Officer Magazine, January 2002
"Journalist Witnesses Pentagon Crash." eWeek.com, 13 Sep 2001
"Witnesses and Leaders on Terrorist Attacks." CNN, 11 Sep 2001
"Bush Vows Retaliation for 'Evil Acts'." USA Today, 11 Sep 2001
"America's Morning of Terror." ChannelOne.com, 2001
"Pentagon Eyewitness Accounts." The Guardian, 12 Sep 2001
"Sept. 11, the Day America Changed." The Baxter Bulletin, 2001
"September 11 Remembered." University Week, 4 Oct 2001
"Pentagon Crash Eyewitness Comforted Victims." MDW News Service, 28 Sep 2001
"Terrorists Attack New York, Pentagon." Los Angeles Times, 12 Sep 2001
"Hell on Earth." UU World, Jan/Feb 2002
"Terrorist 'Situation'." American Lawyer Media, 11 Sep 2001

Websites with eye witness accounts:

perso.wanado.fr...
www.dcmilitary.com...
web.lexis-nexis.com...
www2.hawaii.edu...
lists.travellercentral.com...
www.ournetfamily.com...
www.dcmilitary.com...
www.mdw.army.mil...
www.abcnews.go.com...
www.eweek.com...
www.cnn.com...
play.rbn.com.../usat/g2demand/010911_joel.rm&proto=rtsp
www.counseling.org...
news.nationalgeographic.com...
www.washingtonpost.com...
www.leadertelegram.com...
www.massnews.com...
www.necanet.org...
digipressetmp3.teaser.fr...
www.hjpa.org...
www.dcmilitary.com...
www.guardian.co.uk...
www.cincypost.com...
mfile.akamai.com...
www.clothmonkey.com...
www.abqtrib.com...
www.zwire.com...
www.gopusa.com...
www.baxterbulletin.com...
americanhistory.si.edu...
www.thehawkeye.com...
www.designbuildmag.com...
www.patriotresource.com...
www.delawareonline.com...
www.ireland.com...
www.fccc.org...
www.dcmilitary.com...
www.beanerbanner.com...
www.washingtonpost.com...
news.bbc.co.uk...
www.usatoday.com...
206.181.245.163...
www2.hawaii.edu...
www.smh.com.au...
www.theosuobserver.com...
newsvote.bbc.co.uk...
www.time.com...
www.firehouse.com...
depts.washington.edu...
www.s-t.com...
www.washingtonpost.com...
www.patriotresource.com...
www.coping.org...
www.anderson.ucla.edu...
www.navytimes.com...
www.guardian.co.uk...
www.usatoday.com...
www.lexisone.com...
www.nylawyer.com...
www.thisislocallondon.co.uk...
www.washingtonpost.com...
www.naualumni.com...
arlingtondpca.homestead.com...
www.wherewereyou.org... contribution #1148
www.militarycity.com...
www.dcmilitary.com...
www.space.com...
www.humanevents.org...
www.pittsburgh.com...
www.nationalreview.com...
mfile.akamai.com...
www.spooky8.com...
digipressetmp3.teaser.fr...
www.abqtrib.com...
www2.hawaii.edu...
www.guardian.co.uk...
www.jimroche.com...
www.af.mil...
www.lulac.org...
www.designbuildmag.com...
punkprincess.com...
www.americanmemorials.com...
www.army.mil...
play.rbn.com.../usat/g2demand/010911sucherman.ra&
www.cincypost.com...
www.pstripes.com...
bernie.house.gov...
www.militarycity.com...
www.uua.org...
www.guardian.co.uk...
www.cnn.com...
commemoratewtc.com...
www.gosanangelo.com...
www.cnn.com...
www.cnn.com...
indymedia.org...
www.guardian.co.uk...
www.fredericksburg.com...
www.roadstothefuture.com...

This information taken from

www.oilempire.us...

an organization that has contended for quite some time now that the "no plane" conspiracy theory was a deliberate attempt to distract attention away from the questions that really need to be asked about 9/11.




posted on Nov, 6 2006 @ 10:39 PM
link   
I really hope this video has decent footage of the plane hitting the building,I for one believe it was hit with a plane.The picture's and all the witness are enough proof for me.

If this video does show damning evidence against the missle theory a new conspiracy theory will be made up.Either the footage has been doctored and is fake or that the Plane was on auto pilot and nobody was in control of it,I can see it already,LOL.



posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 03:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by Valhall

Here, get us some pictures.


Nice list to be sure... I shall see what i can do



So where is the video?



posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 03:51 AM
link   

Originally posted by zorgon

So where is the video?




kurtnimmo.com...

Thursday November 02nd 2006, 7:18 pm

“The much anticipated release of the Doubletree Hotel security video that has been speculated it will show a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon is due to be released by one week from today”




November 9 should be when we get to see the video.



posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 02:52 PM
link   
If this infamous video does not surface it will simply add more weight
to the 'no plane' theories that currently exist.
Has anyone seen any news stations pick up on the video's release yet?



posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 02:57 PM
link   
"package that contained video, was destroyed in a fedExtruck crash, no one was hurt but the vhecial exploded and all packages were destroyed!!!"

DAMN YOU FEDEX SHIPPING!!!! NOTHING GOOD WITH THE WORD FED IN IT THESE DAYZ



posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 03:01 PM
link   

Originally posted by trIckz_R_fO_kIdz
"package that contained video, was destroyed in a fedExtruck crash, no one was hurt but the vhecial exploded and all packages were destroyed!!!"


Do you have a link?

How convenient if this is true.




posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 03:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by trIckz_R_fO_kIdz
"package that contained video, was destroyed in a fedExtruck crash, no one was hurt but the vhecial exploded and all packages were destroyed!!!"

DAMN YOU FEDEX SHIPPING!!!! NOTHING GOOD WITH THE WORD FED IN IT THESE DAYZ


i have a feeling, this is what they call sarcasm!!
of course, i could be soo wrong, and if so, then methinks the feds are full of whatchamacallit



posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 03:12 PM
link   


Has anyone seen any news stations pick up on the video's release yet?


Not yet....the story said nov 9th would be the date.....But myself along with some others thought it might be released before the elections in the US...that has not happened and I think its to late for it to happen now and have any effect on the elections.

So now we wait till the 9th and see what happens.



posted on Nov, 7 2006 @ 10:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by etshrtslr
So now we wait till the 9th and see what happens.


Same thing that always happens... nothing...

And friday morning there will be all kinds of stories on why it wasn't


We allowed to take bets in here?



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 09:29 AM
link   
TheFBI put on hold indefinitely the realse of the Double Tree Hotel Video accoring to this article


'The Government said they needed more time'. When asked when enough time would pass before they could release the tape, they said they didn't know and it was indefinite...

www.infowars.net...



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 09:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by 11Bravo
I am with you all the way.
There are just SO many questions.....
And the fact that there are soooo many unaswered questions should be of great concern to everyone. I ask these questions far and wide to everyone I meet in the real world, what about you?


Well, whenever the discussion of 9/11 comes up, I certainly do put these questions up. You wouldn't believe some of the answers I get.

Black Fox,

The insider trading is another issue, one of many. Also, the collapse of WTC 7 without being hit by a plane.

Plus the Israelis arrested celebrating and filming the whole thing. Plus the passport of a terrorist that survived a crash and fire that supposedly brought down two of the world's tallest structures. Plus a thousand of weird things.

I posted the first things that came to mind.



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 11:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_ElfAlso, the collapse of WTC 7 without being hit by a plane.


Thats one of the better ones too. I find it sad that so many people simply accept that the fire in that building was hot enough to melt steel and collapse the building... there wasn't even any fuel in that one...

And the fact that it housed the files for the investigation of Enron and other big companies under investigation... those files now conveniently completely lost... no back ups..

but hey no mystery there

:shk:

I find this part interesting...


Why does the government need more time to release a video that is admitted by the FBI, under penalty of perjury, to show absolutely nothing? What are they cooking up? If they are not cooking anything up why are they flouting the law by refusing to release this and the other 83 tapes?


So in that case what were we expecting to see?



[edit on 8-11-2006 by zorgon]



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 11:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by etshrtslr
TheFBI put on hold indefinitely the release of the Double Tree Hotel Video


Not even Friday yet!! So much for putting the crazy CT'ers to rest



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 12:56 PM
link   
How come it's ok to accept the witness testimonies from the Pentagon and use it to validate the "Plane theory" but disregard the witness testimonies of the WTC, who heard explosives going off?



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 02:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by 2smooth4ya
How come it's ok to accept the witness testimonies from the Pentagon and use it to validate the "Plane theory" but disregard the witness testimonies of the WTC, who heard explosives going off?


Good point.

Have the FBI simply been 'testing the water' to see what the reaction would
be to the news of their imminent release of the Doubletree video?
How much of an anti-climax is it going to be if they simply release a tape from that day where like the Pentagon video we see a large fireball and little else?

Has anybody got a clue when they will release the tape? I presume when the elections have been fully done and dusted.



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 03:05 PM
link   
Well, I'm certainly interested in seeing this video if it does indeed show an air plane. I really don't understand these people who purpose the "double conspiracy", that the NSA created the "No Plane Theory" to discredit CT researchers, I think the "No Plane Theory" created itself due to the lack of visual evidence and such.

I started believing the NPT when I was looking at pictures of the Pentagon and my father, a 14 year veteran of The U.S Special Forces who saw action in Vietnam, thought I was looking at war photos. He told me that if he "didn't know better" (sarcasm added by myself) he would've said it was the exit hole from ordinance of some sort. He told me that he had blasted through walls before and it looked exactly like that. I'll trust my dad over the governmnet any day.

I still find it odd that there is no visual evidence what so ever for this airplane in DC. We have shots of the WTC from every angle covering every minute of the attack, we know airplanes hit those buildings. However, there is nothing, not a photo, audio recording, camera phone, security tape or anything of the sort save for the choppy crappy video they released a while ago when it comes to the Pentagon attacks.

It only takes a little bit of research to find out that, given the laws of phsyics, A LOT of people would notice a plane that size going that fast that close to the ground. Why is there nothing about the Pentagon attacks? It's Washington Freakin DC we're talking about!

The other question I've always wondered about is, why the Pentagon? I understand it's significance in terms of a strategic target but before 9/11 I doubt the vast majority of citizens really knew what the Pentagon was for. What I'm saying, is that it's not a iconic target, which seems to be the MO of most real terrorists. Hell, "terror" is usually an attack designed to cause emotional reactions. Given that, why would they not have attacked anything at all that would be more recognizable to the average American? Any of the monuments, the White House, the Senate, Supreme Court, hell there's a wealth of targets like that in DC. It's Washington Freakin DC!!!

I still smell fish, and you can show me a video of a dog but it'll still smell like fish.



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 03:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by 2smooth4ya
How come it's ok to accept the witness testimonies from the Pentagon and use it to validate the "Plane theory" but disregard the witness testimonies of the WTC, who heard explosives going off?


Oh come on now you know skeptics can't handle more than one argument at a time..

Besides its called "Selective Evidence" Your not supposed to notice things like that.

And what do explosions reported in the WTC have to do with Missiles hitting the Pentagon anyway?

:shk:


Hmmm maybe thats why the percentages of people who believe something is rotten in Denmark is increasing at a steady rate?



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 03:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by pmexplorer
How much of an anti-climax is it going to be if they simply release a tape from that day where like the Pentagon video we see a large fireball and little else?


SMALL fireball... and a red one...

NOT a LARGE ORANGE fireball characteristic of a jet fuel explosion from a full tank of a jetliner... gasoline does NOT BURN RED!!!

Try it sometime in the back yard


But its okay just ignore that fact... its not important

;bash:

;ban:


Now then does anyone have the original release story where the FBI says they are releasing it? All I can find is that Justice Watch released that info so far..



posted on Nov, 8 2006 @ 03:36 PM
link   


quote: Originally posted by 2smooth4ya
How come it's ok to accept the witness testimonies from the Pentagon and use it to validate the "Plane theory" but disregard the witness testimonies of the WTC, who heard explosives going off?


Well for starters the plane theory is a black and white issue. It was a plane, or it was a missile. People saw a plane. End of Story.

The WTC's on the other hand were noises that could have been anything. To note - the noise of a floor falling onto another floor. This could be mistaken as an explosion upon first hearing it.




new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 2  3  4    6  7 >>

log in

join