It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Three Mysterious Objects on Mars!!

page: 4
0
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 09:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by annestacey
Could they possibly be something left behind by one of the spacecraft that have been sent there over the last few years?

Not a chance. Remember these objects are approx 100 feet in length. That's much much bigger than anything we have sent to Mars! And there are three of them.




posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 09:03 AM
link   
The original image, and the high quality close-up, are very intriquing pictures but alot of us seem to be jumping the gun quite quickly.

Now, I know it is great fun to speculate and wonder, however, going off and saying things like:


Originally posted by Techsnow
Smoking GUN!

Something HAS or IS living on MARS!


I am not trying to single out Techsnow in any way --there are more then a few posts that claim this to be the "smoking gun".

True, from this point of view the objects do leave some very interesting questions to be asked; mine being 'in the high-res close up you can see that the bright white aspect to these whatever they are seem to extend out past the landscape and like it is being ejected from the black area...as dense smoke would'. The areas which I am talking about are circled in red.



But, to debunk my own argument I could say that the areas I have circled in blue have the exact same appearance but are just not being contrasted by the dark 'shadows' or 'holes'; whatever they may be.

I would also like to see this from another angle. As we all know I am sure, the orientation of the picture could play tricks with our eyes. Another shot taken at a completely different time in the Mars rotation --or a differnt time of day on mars-- could help to show this as nothing more than odd shadows placed at an intriquing distance.

Either way, I don't know what I am looking at but I, as you all should, find a possible explination and then try and debunk it myself. Find a possible explination and then work three times as hard to find a debunking argument...speculation without real thought won't solve anything.

Then again, this is only a curious and speculative mind speaking.



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 09:14 AM
link   
3 structures as you said 800' apart perfect alignment. Structures are geometric duplicates of each other and Martonian sand has built up on stationary structures. Now here is the kicker remember I always preface to say on Mars what you think and see is isn't and what you think and see isn't is. Structure far right has a very white humanoid Martonian face slightly larger eyes, that is partially over lapped by structure and is on left side of structure. Take your time you will not see it at first remember how I told you to view on Mars. The far right structure's face is easier to see on the smaller pic. Look left of middle structure, very white Egyptian or Mesopotamian looking face structure encompassed with support walls. Middle face will take time to see and is easier to see on enlarged photo. Far left structure, face left of structure harder to make out. Rik



[edit on 4-11-2006 by rikriley]



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 09:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by Leevi
Here is a high-quality closup. Those are definitely some kind of.. tubes..oh God

I am sorry to say it, but the quality of that enlargement is not higher than that of the original.

Making a picture bigger does not make it "higher-quality".
Also, it looks a little "washed out".

Any image that is not the original image from NASA can not be a higher-quality image, it can look better to our eyes but we can not create quality if there wasn't enough on the original itself.

Even that GIF from NASA was allready the result of some post-processing, that area from the original image (the one found in the link that says "Download compressed raw data in PDS .IMQ format") looks like this:



This is after a "Automatic levels" changing in Photoshop.




As for what that could be, I don't have any idea, but it doesn't look artificial to me, and one of the reason is that the distance between them is "almost" the same, but not really the same, and anyone can see that.



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 10:11 AM
link   
rikriley

I saw that face too, After reading one of your earlier posts in this thread about the letters on the five sided rock I saw those letters straight away too, and on the same rock, equidistant above the 'S' I can clearly see the form or a Human/Martonian, can anyone else see that. Looks a little like a stick man with an (opaque head)



I've zoomed and clearly marked it here:



Interesting!! But it could just as well be chance I suppose.

And to be clear, there is evidence or proof needed to make us understand/believe your claims of contact and ancestary.



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 11:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by Orion437
And what about this ¿¿!! :


marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov...
marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov...
marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov...
marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov...
marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov...
marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov...
marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov...


What exactly was I supposed to be looking at there? Rocks and some sand?

Forgive me if I missed it but I would like to know what the purpose of the links was. I am not trying to be snooty with it, I am actually quite interested to hear what I am missing in the photos.



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 11:11 AM
link   

Originally posted by ArMaP
As for what that could be, I don't have any idea, but it doesn't look artificial to me, and one of the reason is that the distance between them is "almost" the same, but not really the same, and anyone can see that.


I consider myself "somebody" and by the looks of it the distances are pretty crack on to being equal as far as I can see.

Looks more artificial than natural imo. I mean. How often do three seemingly equal distanced rocks/craters form in the middle of a flat barren...


[edit on 4-11-2006 by xEphon]



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 11:11 AM
link   
I see some letters now.

Looks like a D... E... B... U... N... and a KED.




Come on guys, why would the "Martonians" make faces and letters in the dirt?



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 11:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by spines

Originally posted by Orion437
And what about this ¿¿!! :


marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov...


What exactly was I supposed to be looking at there? Rocks and some sand?

Forgive me if I missed it but I would like to know what the purpose of the links was. I am not trying to be snooty with it, I am actually quite interested to hear what I am missing in the photos.


Here's what Orion was trying to show...
Notice the resemblance of the Mars 'cairn' to the ones on Earth. So is the one on Mars artificial??


Courtesy JP Skipper and David Price



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 11:25 AM
link   
wow thats really interesting.
that brings up a whole new list of questions.



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 11:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by mythatsabigprobe

Come on guys, why would the "Martonians" make faces and letters in the dirt?



Maybe for the same reason someone drew the Nazca Lines in the dirt here on earth:


Source: www.crystalinks.com...

Or maybe it's because there's no crops to make crop circles.



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 02:26 PM
link   
Very fascinating indeed. Outside of using the excuse of a photo anomoly, I don't see how NASA is going to brush this one aside. Hopefully we'll somehow be able to get a closer, higher resolution shot of this. I wonder how much residue they are submeged under, and if they are even much taller when uncovered fully from their base? Too many things on mars that are head scratchers to not make one lean towards intelligences having been there IMHO.



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 02:45 PM
link   
What about this skull shaped object in the corner of this NASA Mars picture :







Here the website shows a closer picture of it :

www.marsanomalyresearch.com...

[edit on 4-11-2006 by iqonx]

[edit on 4-11-2006 by iqonx]

[edit on 4-11-2006 by iqonx]

[edit on 4-11-2006 by iqonx]



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 02:49 PM
link   
Does anyone here have an explaination for why images featuring these anomalies have had little to no publicity in mainstream media? Or have I been missing out or what?



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 03:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by laiguana
Does anyone here have an explaination for why images featuring these anomalies have had little to no publicity in mainstream media? Or have I been missing out or what?


If you think the mainstream media takes on stories about specualtion of otherworldly events, then I would say yes, you have been missing out. Very rarely does it happen and when is does its usually disinfo.



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 04:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by laiguana
Does anyone here have an explaination for why images featuring these anomalies have had little to no publicity in mainstream media? Or have I been missing out or what?



Maybe because mass media are controled by political forces that decide what is interesting to the people or not!... ...



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 04:09 PM
link   
mikesingh:

cairns are known all around the world and even in the arctic and desert areas. They are markers for others and even denote direction etc. Another great find and lets keep em' coming.

Why isn't somebody making a TV show on this stuff?



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 04:13 PM
link   
I don't know why you guys think this is so hard to debunk. I mean it's not like there aren't any other such natural formations with three or more objects aligned and share very nearly the same distance between one another. Take a look at the night sky and you'll see that Orion's Belt is made up of 3 stars that seem to be lined up in a straight line and looks like they're separated by the same amount of distance. So, is Orion's belt made by an extraterrestrial race? Somehow, I doubt it.

[edit on 4-11-2006 by Impreza]



posted on Nov, 4 2006 @ 04:20 PM
link   
I think that the supposed "cairn" is a rock that is visible in another photo, I saw it some hours ago but I forgot to post it here.

Edit:
Here it is, I think that the "cairn" is the rock that can be seen on the top of that little dune. If the other photos were taken somewhere to the right of the position where Spirit was when this photo was taken, then the rock could be seen just appearing over that little sand dune.

But I am not saying that this is the case, I am only saying that, to me, it looks like the same rock(and not a pile of rocks) that can be seen on the other photos posted.

The photo

[edit on 4/11/2006 by ArMaP]



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join