It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Amina Lawal, 30, has been sentenced to death by stoning - a fate which would involve being buried up to her neck in sand and have rocks thrown at her head. However, the Islamic court has ruled that the penalty cannot be carried out until Lawal has finished breastfeeding her baby daughter, Wasila, which the judge said would not be before January 2004.
Originally posted by 27jd
So the rapists knew she was not married to that guy? I didn't see that in the article
Originally posted by JBurns
27/Mage, I was thinking the exact same thing.
I don't see why Bravo is so quick to defend a culture that condones torturing victims of a violent crime.
It's ok though, really, we've all booked our share of rape/mugging/murder victims.
Originally posted by seagull
People keep saying if she hadn't been in the car she would not have been raped
Originally posted by half_minded
Therefore, there could be 2 scenarios.
1. The rapists could get lucky and find a woman alone. Unlikely
2. The stranger the woman was with had this whole thing set up with the rapists. Which we know is true because he was recording the whole rape on his mobile phone video camera.
If the woman had obeyed the law, then she would not have been raped because then she would not have been with the stranger in the first place. According to the report, the stranger was in on the rape plan and was recording the rape on his mobile phone while it happened.
A male friend of the rape victim was also sentenced to 90 lashes for being alone with her in the car.
The court heard that the victim and her friend were followed by the assailants to their car, kidnapped and taken to a remote farm, where the raping occurred.
A fifth, married, man who was stated to have filmed the rape on his mobile phone still faces investigation.
Originally posted by half_minded
2. The stranger the woman was with had this whole thing set up with the rapists. Which we know is true because he was recording the whole rape on his mobile phone video camera...
Originally posted by half_minded
Maybe if you lived in the culture you would understand it better.
Originally posted by redmage
Her "obeying the law" (or lack thereof) had nothing to do with her being raped.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
I wonder if anyone here realizes the possibility that the people in question most likely had dealings with each other prior to this event.
And to everyone here is going to make a base an opinion (and some of them opinions being brutal) on each individual of an entire society based ON A STORY THAT YOU CANNOT VERIFY EXCEPT THROUGH INDIRECT MEANS AND ONLY THROUGH OTHER PEOPLES PERCEPTION...*ahem*.......all I have to say is..
"Whoah."
Women, whether Saudi Arabian or foreign, emerge time and again as victims of discrimination because of the law, social mores and traditions. While women have gained some ground in terms of economic rights and have established companies and charitable institutions, their civil, political and social rights are systematically violated.
Furthermore, women are forbidden from driving, a ban made official in 1990 by a Fatwa issued by the Council of Senior ‘Ulama.6 To walk unaccompanied or to be in the company of a man who is neither her husband nor a close relative puts her at risk of arrest on suspicion of prostitution or other "moral" offences. Given these restrictions on their right to freedom of movement, the scope for women in Saudi Arabia to enjoy the spectrum of civil, political, social, economic and cultural rights is limited in the extreme.
"I was brought to the whipping area. They tied me to a post. My hands were handcuffed and they also shackled my legs. I was wearing a T-shirt and jogging pants... The whip was one and a half metres long... with a heavy lead piece attached to the tip. It was terrible. Some fell on my thighs and my back. I would fall when the whip reached my feet but the prison guard would raise me up to continue the whipping. It was terrible. I was amazed to find myself still alive after the 70th lash was given. It lasted about 15 minutes... my back was bleeding. I cried."
"I thought it will be fast but no, it was done one at a time... [The policeman] really takes his time before striking. I started counting and when it reached 40 I thought I could not make it... I prayed so hard... At last it reached 60... I could not explain the pain I experienced. The stick he used was like a bamboo, round but hard."
Each time he received the lashes he was left with bruised or bleeding buttocks, unable to sleep or sit for three or four days afterwards.
Originally posted by JBurns
I don't see why Bravo is so quick to defend a culture that condones torturing victims of a violent crime.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
Originally posted by redmage
Her "obeying the law" (or lack thereof) had nothing to do with her being raped.
Thanks for adding your own bit of obtuse reasoning.....
I wonder if anyone here realizes the possibility that the people in question most likely had dealings with each other prior to this event. As, such, any detail that is specified, as of yet in this thread, fails to account for the 'causes' that set everyone together there in the first place.
..
Originally posted by JIMC5499
I have lost track of the number of posts about Iran and North Korea stating that a country should be free to do what it wants within it's own borders. Granted the majority of these posts have delt with the development of nuclear weapons, but how is this any different?