I am amazed at a few of the comments i have read here.

"I cant say much for the British.. They don't have balls to stand up and fight what is wrong, they cant get up and say that they don't like
camera every 2 ft, they will enjoy being chipped in 10 yrs. "

On the whole I agree, we are a country full of lethargic drones and the surveillance system has crept up on the majority without them batting an
eyelid.
And this..

"I have nothing to say to them, I can see why our forefathers broke away from the motherland....."

You never broke from the mother land.. I share a theory with many.. The uk uses the US as it's booted right foot. The seat of all world Masonic power
resides in the UK, in London and with the Scottish Rite in Scotland. The freemasons built the USA. Take a look at the street maps of Washington (the
US's seat of power) featured so heavily on this forum. What better way for the powers that be to stomp on the rest of the world without any
repercussions at it's power base.. If it appears that the US is the baddie.. They will ultimately take the flak. Ever thought your administration are
merely puppets of something much bigger?
And this..

"How does it affect me?...... errrrr it doesn't. It makes me feel safe, knowing that there are people watching out for possible signs of
trouble. If you obey the law, you have nothing to fear. It's the laws like your patriot act that I would fear the most."

It makes you feel safe? Are you serious. What about your civil liberties? What about your privacy? How do you know the people compiling all your most
private information have honest intentions?
You may not be breaking any laws now but what about all of your recorded actions and movements coming back to haunt you in the future, when new laws
are imposed making even the simplest actions illegal. All it takes is a click of a button and your life will be profiled and your file pulled. Just
appearing on this forum could be enough to flag you for 're-education'.
And this..

"The way I see it is that it's not much more different then having more officers around the city monitering what's going on. This is just
more efficient."

And how is it more efficient? An officer on the beat is able to react and assist as well as being a visible deterrent. A camera is no deterrent. All
you have at the end of the day is an mpeg file of some unrecognisable guy in a hoodie stamping your head into the ground.
Our governments own research has found that CCTV is not a crime deterrent..
news.bbc.co.uk...
and
news.bbc.co.uk...
Then there is the fact that all cctv in towns is being upgraded to bring in revenue from motorists. Ask any uk copper and they will tell you all this
is doing is criminalising the whole of the population committing the smallest of parking offences and turning the public against the police. But hey..
as long as they are raising cash for more cameras eh?
New systems with facial recognition are able to hold parents responsible for kids playing truant and log the movement of any of those not already
carrying a mobile phone.
Oh.. and this...

"That's what I don't get.. It's not as though the guy watching is focussed on anyone that isn't looking like they're blatantly
suspicious..
They're only scrutinised AFTER a crime has been commited or if lucky, DURING, When someone could be lucky enough to have their life saved during an
assault and witnesses too."

The UK now has behavioural software connected to CCTV that can automatically assess 'suspicious' activity like standing in a group of popping into
more that a handful of shops.. I mean come on.. with systems like this we don't need to be chipped.
Personally I think there are are better ways to police that are more personal and create more of a feeling of community rather than sticking all these
eyes in hidden places so they can indiscriminately watch our every move in a godlike fashion.