It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What I would do with world order...

page: 1
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 1 2006 @ 07:31 PM
link   
Alright, i have no idea if anyone has said this before and i am sure that i will become a much more established member but consider this. What would you do if you controled the world? STAY AT THE TOP! All small details aside i figured out what the smartest of smart would do! Ok, remember thoes africans that are seculded in the bushes somewhere in the heart of africa who we protect to not spoil with human intervention? take thoes same africans and enslave them to have an egyptian rule over them after exterminating everyone else who "exist" outside of this protected primitive culture. Thust u can kill all oposition of thoes who have become tooooooo smart and still remain the dominant figure....IM TAKIN KILL THE WHOLE WORLD AND RESTART IN POWER, ON TOP WITH OUR BEST TECHNOLOGY.




any thoughts?




posted on Nov, 1 2006 @ 11:23 PM
link   
clones, and cyborgs will come into play but eventually with radioactive materials decaying things faster all traces of life outside that central zone would start a new.



posted on Nov, 2 2006 @ 02:51 PM
link   
I think I speak for the majority of ATS when I say huh? That post made very VERY little sense.



posted on Nov, 2 2006 @ 03:02 PM
link   
i think it makes perfect sense. what about it dont you get?



posted on Nov, 2 2006 @ 03:15 PM
link   
How would you go about "exterminating" the rest of the world? And why would you enslave 'primative africans'?



posted on Nov, 2 2006 @ 03:40 PM
link   
to clear things up BTW this theory of mine is not how i would do things. This is what i feel the ulitimate goal of the elite would be.

Extermination could come in MANY forms. bioloical or chemical seem to be the easiest and most wide spread. brute force would be a more pin point way of killing. atomic bomb here or there...


no to the africans. i hope you see that this is not a race issue. its a matter of mental understanding. if we have seculuded a group of people from ever seeing whats outside of a however many acre strech of land then we have an almost perfect subject to finally enter the picture and tell them whats up.


it would restart history as we know it. we could have a whole new time line exactly like the one we have now which we could control behind the curtains.





im being vague because i want people to connect the dots of all the information they know and see how perfectly the picture gets sewn together



posted on Nov, 2 2006 @ 04:30 PM
link   

Extermination could come in MANY forms. bioloical or chemical seem to be the easiest and most wide spread. brute force would be a more pin point way of killing. atomic bomb here or there...


But why would you want to kill everybody? Why not just make the world a better place for everyone??



posted on Nov, 2 2006 @ 10:38 PM
link   
i never said it was right or good. i just said it was to the elites benefit to enslave a population of undereducated people. it doesnt have to be just primitave africans, it can be anyone who has never known what it is to ask questions. why bother saving the world when you can live lavish at the expense of free labor?



posted on Nov, 2 2006 @ 10:48 PM
link   
Why not just cut education in a country like America? We already have plenty of people that have never been out of their neighborhood or trailer park. Plus you can feed manufactured information to them via the television.



posted on Nov, 2 2006 @ 10:56 PM
link   
is that not what we are doing? the problem here is that their are a rising number of "informed" people. with them in the way trying to awaken the mentally dead thoes who need dim witted folk also must find a way to silence the sophist.



posted on Nov, 2 2006 @ 10:59 PM
link   
hell "we" dont even have to cut education. "we" would need to destroy enlightening books and only sell new completly untrue versions for the masses to fight and die over. war is a profitable endeavor.



posted on Nov, 2 2006 @ 11:18 PM
link   
I get what you are saying. This is pretty unsettling. Things would start over with the largest power gap possible, the person at the top would be in control of things with a 3000 year technology gap. Seems to me that if mass-extermination ever happens, situations like this could develop, though not as extreme. If the passing of knowledge ever failed (and most man-made things had been destroyed) then the next generations could in fact be completely ignorant to technological advances!

Kind of like Planet of the Apes. The human slaves had no idea what they were capable of.



posted on Nov, 2 2006 @ 11:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by Watchful1
Alright, i have no idea...

any thoughts?
Your world order doesn't really even seem like a world order. Plus, getting ride of the smart people is the worst thing you can possibly do. What is the point in controlling a society of stupid poeple? The true power is in having smart people on your side, abnd the more there are the more power you would have.



posted on Nov, 3 2006 @ 12:05 AM
link   
the 4th branch twist on my quote was nice half. to have thoes smart people on your side is one thing.(they may be helpful but you always must worry about if they turn on you) ALSO, you CANT have smart people who oppose you on your side...thats a contradiction. ON TOP OF THAT...you want stupid people so that they dont question why you do what you do and wont discuss amongst eachother things which may lead to higher education and possible eventual overthrow. anyone else not understand what is being stated?



posted on Nov, 3 2006 @ 12:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Watchful1
the 4th branch twist on my quote was nice half. to have thoes smart people on your side is one thing.(they may be helpful but you always must worry about if they turn on you) ALSO, you CANT have smart people who oppose you on your side...thats a contradiction. ON TOP OF THAT...you want stupid people so that they dont question why you do what you do and wont discuss amongst eachother things which may lead to higher education and possible eventual overthrow. anyone else not understand what is being stated?
I understand what is being stated even more then you. You said "What would you do if you controled the world?" Key word IF. Stating you already abtained world order and you are ask what we would do. If you had WORLD order under your belt there would be no one oposing you. Which is impossible. So, if in that cercumstance what would you do? make the most advanced and powerful society. And you would need smart people under your control to do that. And the true power of control would be controling smart people over stupid people.


[edit on 3-11-2006 by halfmask]

[edit on 3-11-2006 by halfmask]



posted on Nov, 3 2006 @ 12:34 AM
link   
the truely smart people, or even loyal or souls sold of a price, would either perfer "working" for you or be smart enough to understand that if they slip they die. if you have "world control" you must already be a master at information containment and control. you also dont seem to factor that maybe what i have said has already been done in our past and the "controlers" were humans like you and me that took science to the next level. the "smart" people you talk about controling could very realisticly be controled beyond their control. our brain has a brain wave right? like a radio frequence correct? who has figured out the station we run on and have the mic in hand? ALSO smart people can perform a task you tell them if they are informed in such a way that misleads them on what their work is really being used for.



posted on Nov, 3 2006 @ 07:43 AM
link   
Wow.
This dude just said, "I'd enslave primative africans, kill every one else, and then rule the primative people so there is noone smart enough to overthrow me".

You have some problems..



posted on Nov, 3 2006 @ 09:37 AM
link   
lol homie just said i have some problems...


what you miss is that i am explaining this to you because i feel it has already happnened and will happen again.


how do you think i came up with this? evil genius? no.





people say "bigger picture"...this is stamp size to where i could take it from here.



posted on Nov, 3 2006 @ 09:40 AM
link   
I think this speculation exercise needs a lil more data. Like- what is the purpose of the NWO? Whoe are they? (Demons, power hungry elite, aliens.) What is their ultimate goal.

Sorry, just not enough info.



posted on Nov, 3 2006 @ 01:27 PM
link   
im not here to convince you that i am right. what i am here to do is tell you something that hit me deep when the pieces fell into place. i am more so asking how you think this will be achieved and what your thoughts or insight into this claim are.


and how the # can i get data when it would all be destroyed in this event and to actually claim its truth i would have to be there?


this is a conspiracy fourm correct? TOO much of 'our' data is missing to prove 'us' right.






does anyone else get that what i mean by saying what i have is that it is VERY possible to pull this stunt off if we believe the power 'the shadow government' has. if area 51 is a nutty dreamland of science then the men who achieved such an end could surely use new technology and ruthless tactics to set fourth this plan in motion...



new topics

top topics



 
0
<<   2 >>

log in

join