This topic is in the Ancient & Lost Civilizations discussion forum.  (rss)


the Sumerian King list recompiled in Base 10


<<  1    2    3  >>



reply posted on 8-4-2007 @ 05:36 PM by jaydelay


i would reply to your message UTU but i need to have atleast 20 posts.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 8-4-2007 @ 06:30 PM by Marduk


stevenpyatt@yahoo.co.uk



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-4-2007 @ 01:49 AM by Inannamute


I find the sumerians fascinating too, I love the stories and the characters..

(Inanna being a personal favorite, obviously)

I'm somewhat confused by the way you're respresenting the base 60 numbers in base 10.. eg, does 1200 represent 12/60, 0/60
Or does it represent 1/60 2/60, 0/60 0/60..

Just semi confused, once you explain that I can check the math as I understand it



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-4-2007 @ 05:02 AM by Marduk


the "base 60" lol
ok
some of the dates given to klings on the earlier part of the list need to be divided by 60 to make them realistic
the king list these dates were taken from was compiled in antiquity fropm even older lists
it is my theory that the list that these particular long dates were taken from was recorded in a different manner from base 10
so whenever you see a king has reigned for an impossible length of time you need to divide the years by 60 to get the actual number in base 10
so 1200 divided by 60 is 20 years

btw inanna isn't mute anymore is she ?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-4-2007 @ 05:19 PM by Inannamute


No, I understand base 60, I didn't need an explanation of that. What I'm asking is how you're representing the numbers.

eg, in binary, it's easy to represent numbers using base-10 symbols 1011, being 11.

But in base 60, you need to separate the "columns" somehow, if you're going to represent them using base-10 symbols - a common example obviously being the digital clock, which uses 5:15, showing us that we're counting 15/60, with 5x60..

If you write 1042, its a little less clear - are we to assume that each pair of digits is a column?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 12-4-2007 @ 07:26 PM by Marduk


its not base 60
the actual dates were multiplied by a factor of 60 before they were recorded
so you just need to divide by 60 to get the real length of reign



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-7-2008 @ 10:18 PM by Anonymous ATS


forum.bib-arch.info...
profiles.aim.com...
www.esnips.com...;jsessionid=15D91074EC9815F0A38524D3A87D864F
www.esnips.com...

The preFlood text is in days, sars of 3600 days is 10 years.
The kings rule 80 years and 100 years and 120 years mostly.
Total correct list is 10 kings of 970 years from Methuselah's
birth to the Flood. The shorter list of 8 kings and 670 years
is 300 years less, it presumes Larsa's first king who was
the 4th king (first three being 80 and 100 and 120), it presumes
was the 1st king Alulim with 7 kings following him.
The last king died during the 40 day deluge of the planet by
11,000 feet of ocean water covering Mount Ararat, and ascended
to heaven where he came from. Then 350 years later
when Noah died on Dec 24 this spirit king Xisuthros appeared
on the 40th day and claimed to be Noah on Feb 2 of 2020 BC.

Links show charts to define it. All chronology is completely logged
from all cultures. The postFlood Sumerian list is a collection of
different cities such as Ereck who counted in months not years.
Gusur could be Nimrod who died in Year 1200 which is 600 years
after the Flood and Nimrod was 500 when he died. The Venus Firebird
(Phoenix Firebird) of this year 2256 AM is Quetzalcoatl because as
the Flood star the Maya presumed it as a Septuagint Flood (2256) instead
of 1656. So instead of 1770 BC being a Mayan 2256 from Adam, the
Maya use it as Babylon's year 3600 from Adam.
The 1344 from Flood 3114 BC is actually Venus 1344 from Noah's birth
in 2970 BC, Flood 2370 BC, and year 1344 being Amizadiga's Venus of 1625 BC (2400 from Adam twice 1200) mistaken for the 1770 BC
(2256 Venus from ADam) which is Noah's 1200.

You cant find your 2009 AD asteroid which is hitting the Earth
if you didnt know the real astronomy now from real history.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


<<  1    2    3  >>







Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:












ATS Thread Tag System
Members can add a custom descriptive tag to any thread on ATS. Thread Tags will help categorize our site content, help to cross-reference similar threads, and improve the searchability of all ATS threads. This thread is currently defined by these tags:

,
















ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.003 seconds
Page processed in 0.088 seconds
7 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread