I wanted to add that Alex Jones has a network of people, some of whom I'm sure he hasn't named or made reference, that communicate real time. He has
his finger on the pulse of what's happening in our government and military, and I'm sure hasn't completely divulged these sources in toto.
My point is that, beyond this network, Alex has been watching things long enough to begin to get a feel for how things unfold with regard to our
government and military's programs. This is my sense. And this is beyond the obvious; i.e., elections around the corner, something's going to
happen. Interesting timing that just before the November election, the gas prices go down. What other things are signifiers of events that follow (or
preceded them)?
I would be interested to get Alex's take on this, and what signs he has seen over the last few years. I couldn't give any myself specifically. I
wasn't really following events until recently, because prior to Bush and 9-11, there wasn't much drawing my attention to politics, aside from
national news releases about President Clinton getting a blowjob, which I was forced to watch, because everyone was covering it.
I had dismissed our national media long before that; I wasn't drawn into investigation until those planes hit the towers. That's one example of why
I think that event was the death knell for this administration, and possibly will alter how this government operates with regard to the will of its
citizens, forever. And this is very contrary to what this administration had hoped to gain from those events, which was more than just billions of
dollars.
The fact that just about every person in this country thinks our government lied about what happened is unprecedented in our history. It gives me a
sick feeling thinking about it. And unfortunately for them, this event, and those that followed, have damned this administration. One could think that
public outrage was the impetus for the frantic grab for power, but I'm more apt to think it was a long time in the planning.
Anyway, I think there are signs that Alex should make public as part of his predictions, so people can see what's driving those predictions. But like
I said, he may have some sources he doesn't want to divulge. He can, however, point out some of the signs we all can witness or research, so we can
begin to do the detective work ourselves. We should be doing that on our own anyway. I think we are.
The greatest thing Alex can do (and does), and those rushing to expose/bring this information to the bright light of day, is to get us to look at our
government and world events in a different way; i.e., with regard to the subtler (and not so subtle) movements that, when taken separately don't hold
half the significance as when they are all put together to form a greater picture; the events and signs that became obvious after the fact - the
footprints - that revealed how we came to where we are, and how the government has lead us there - like to a "national emergency".
I admit that if there is collusion with other heads of government that are supposed to be enemies of the U.S., that it is harder to make connections,
but if you imagine events as controlled to some extent, that there is a larger play going on, it will help provide a clearer and more logical picture
of what could be going on. I think Alex has suggested collusion, and it may, on its face, seem paranoid and unreasonable, but I think the idea is
worth entertaining until it has been thoroughly and absolutely investigated and disproved beyond a reasonable doubt. The possibility must be
considered.
Events on this planet, and in particular those that involve the U.S. government and military no longer happen in a vacuum. At least to an awakening
number of people, who used to view events as distinct and unconnected.
There is an education going on worldwide that is enlightening those that have access to free and unadulterated informaton. This is an education forced
upon citizens of the U.S. (and arguably the world) in particular, by the blatant criminal acts of our government. The lesson we are learning is
different than a lot of us have learned before, and that is how to read our government. How to read world affairs. It's not a lesson the layman is
used to undertaking, but it's become the most critical lesson we as the citizens of this country - and undeniably the world - must learn if we are to
survive.
I feel right now that the entire world has their eyes on Washington, D.C., and President Bush's administration. They are now operating under a
microscope, and the United States House is, hopefully, about to make a shift to the Democratic party. This does not promise, however, a solution to
the immense problem of addressing the mountains of unConstitutional and anti-American citizen legislation that has passed since Bush was elected - but
it is a start.
We, the U.S. and the world, are poised at the brink of a very dangerous war. Right now, everyone with eyes to see can feel we are at the edge of a
very dangerous precipice. And of great concern is that the aggressive U.S. government, lead by Cheney's
one percent doctrine, has already placed troops in Iran. A poster in this thread
asserts there is much more going on - I haven't researched this, but would suggest it's accurate.
The world is watching us now. And I don't know about the rest of the world, but the citizens of the United States are tired of war - and we are not
convinced there is an immediate, clear and present danger for our country - there wasn't with the unConstitutional invasion of Afghanistan, there
wasn't with Iraq - and there is not with Iran. Aggression is not our philosophy as freedom-loving Americans - we're human beings, and we do not
share a killing machine's philosophy, or politics. Neither, apparently, do over three hundred, and growing, enlisted U.S. soldiers.
I would hope that Congress has reviewed and approved a war with Iran, but I suggest it has done no such thing. Bush has already engaged in war with
two countries without formal proclamation of war, which would require congressional approval, so why start now? And why should the congress start to
defend its (non-existent) principles now? Why don't we just drop nukes on every country suspected of disliking the U.S., and those that associate
with those that dislike the U.S.? How far do we take this?
Watch, learn and teach.
