golddragnet what you have learned is extremely dangerous. I would be very careful about what questions you answer that might give away your I.D. I would also suggest you get the appropriate I.P address, plus other hiding software.

Ian Huntley was just a cleaner, and yeah is innocent.
However was he killed by someone working at the base? Who then dumps the bodies outside the base? (Quite unlikely, unless they’re completely mad, and as a genuine lunatic would be even more unlikely to qualify for state protection)
Or does this location simply derail conspiracyists away from a darker secret?
You said secret paedophile ring, maybe. Or maybe black magic ring?

Obviously a death caused by a serviceman at a U.S base wouldn’t do the bases PR reputation any favours. But I doubt it wouldn’t come anywhere near to causing it to be closed. Therefore what happened with this U.S serviceman is as irrelevant as the bodies location.
What’s important is that a dark group has caused the police, mass media, and justice system to frame a perfectly innocent man, in order to protect a guilty group. The mass media would have cooperated on the understanding the cause was on national security grounds (though this is of course a lie).

Perhaps questions should also be asked about the five prostitutes murdered up north, and the fork lift driver they claim did it?
Or maybe not? Personally I would forget about it; know what you know but surely you can see that in (in this case) Resistance is Futile? You’re not a world changer.

I have heard from a former inmate or patient at Rampton that the authorities there do administer very high doses of drugs to the patients constantly, and he is sure that the doctors there use the patients for experiments with different drugs. He described his time there, drugged constantly against his will, being out of it all day, and totally at the mercy of the authorities. He couldn't remember alot, other than being drugged all the time, he saw the faces of other patients, looking totally vacant and drooling mouths open, and he said that he was aware that he must have looked the very same himself. He told of one occasion when the medics brought out a huge needle, enormous one, he was already weak from being drugged and motionless for long periods, the medics told him they wanted to test his brain, the huge needle was pushed into his face and he could feel it going up behind his eyeball and into his brain before they released the conconction and he passed out. He was very lucky to get out of there. Patients can be held there even if they aren't criminals, all the authorities have to do is hold them under the Mental Health act. He said that Huntley would definintely have been drugged constantly and probably deprived of daylight, it would have been easy for the authorities to attempt to brainwash him through hypnosis and the drugs.

When Huntley appeared in court his appearance was remarked on by the press and it was obvious he had been treated with neuroleptic drugs at Rampton.

I don't know if anyone is still reading this thread, but if you are...

I was in Soham when this happened. I went to the trial.

I have no doubt that Huntley killed those two girls.

Those who quoted the late Mr Vialls theories need to realise they have holes big enough to drive a red Ford Fiesta through.

Huntley was guilty, get over it.

But if you want to debate it some more, let me know.

49 fibres from the man u shirts of the girls were found in his house and his finger prints on the black bag in the hangar where he tried to burn their clothes..

s

Forgive me if someone has already mentioned this but wasn't there evidence concerning the CCTV cameras which picked the two girls up on their way home right up to the point they reach Huntleys home yet none of the cameras pick them up after that point! Clear evidence that they went missing near Huntley home!
As far as I'm concerned Huntley is guilty.
As for him being brain damaged! Haven't heard that before but from what I've read in the newspapers he now shares his cell with his lboyfriend . . .

I cannot believe i am reading this! I was only told the nearly the EXACT same story by a friend
who was told it by a US serviceman in a bar while my friend was on holiday.

I found it to hard to believe and was not going to post on it but then my friend said
it was common knowledge that it was indeed a US serviceman who had committed
the murders and he had done it before in soul in Korea a young girl killed so they said.
Apparently this too was hushed up and the man was moved to England.

There are so many holes in the official story as to make this a possibility.

If this was found to be true imagine the outrage it would of coursed and they could not
do with our close ties with the US being broken because of what happened.

I really do not know what to believe but why would US servicemen come out with such a story?
Then i look just out of curiosity and here it is! a thread on what i heard. can this be true?