Originally posted by golddragnet
My user name is Zuri
there is alot of evidence which I have posted earlier but it is beyond your intellect to read it.
You`ve posted views expressed on an internet site for American`s who believe there govt is corrupt.
It is of course a political conpsiracy
Nope you believe it is a govt conspiracy.A political conspiracy would include the use of political involvement.I.E voting riging, politicians using
dirty tricks,bribes,scandals to gain political power not the govt of the day hidding a crime to cover another govts actions in a foreign country.
as it was orchestrated by the Home Office.
You haven`t provided any documents to suggest any dept within the govt was responsible.
If it had to come light that it was USAF servicemen responsible it would have done enormous hamr to Blair's already unpopular support of
No both Bush and Blair have no control over the actions of a person from there respective countries.
You are deliberatly underestimating the backlash from the public.
So since the actions of American Servicemen against Iraq prisonners during the time that American need to be the good guys has since resulted in Bush
or Blair being ousted from power.
I am not american.
Then l suggest you stop acting like one
This is the final time I will direct a reply to you Zuri as your efforts at debating the facts are worse than pathetic, you should finish
reading the Sunday Sport before tuning into your daily dose of SKY tv
I`m not in the UK.I read EL PAIS,EL Mundo,Sur somtimes The Mail and Independent.I don`t have sky or British T.V, l like Gran Hermano e Operacion
Truinfo (very sad).I don`t care you respond this a disscussion site and l am having a disscussion.If you cannot take a disscusion that is opposite to
your view then better you don`t respond.
Too come to your level and sound like a child you started with the insults and OTT responses.
I`ve looked at your many long paragraphs that you have re typed from other web pages.May l suggest you use your computor properly and insert links.It
saves time.Ask your grand kids they will be able to explain how.
And as for that web site that you`ve copied from there is no evidance at all but the writers views,theres no links to sources investigations or
interviews by the author.they don`t state they have spoken to the people who had evidence left out of the case, or anything that backs up the
statements in it. To simple state witness x was bribed, witness z evidence wasn`t given etc etc etc isn`t frankly evidance at all.The writer need s to
get of his bum and interview these people,then enter there comments allong with dates and affidavit`s (so that person is stating the truth whole and
nothing but the truth) then post it on the site.That my simple friend is evidence anything less it circumstantial hersay.
P.S l`d rather read the Sun than that site at least they have humour and page THREE
[edit on 29-10-2006 by zuri]