Alot of these are well established classic fakes. The biggest damage to the credibility is that it comes from Pravda. Pravda is like the U.S.'s Weekly World News when it comes to "news of the weird."

Pravda or not. The most of those photo's I haven't seen debunked yet. If they are well established classic fakes, please point out where to me.

The first one was shown to be a double exposure if I am not mistaken.

As far as I know, only two of the pics were established fakes. Some of the others were suspected fakes, but could not be proven either way.

Although some of them are very note-worthy, I don't think they should call them the 'Top Ten'. IMO

From viewing the pictures it looks like numbers 1,2,3,6,9 & 10 are fakes.

That still leaves #'s 4,5,7 & 8 which to me are plausible than the others to be real.

And as far as the source is concerned....the WSJ or NYT are not going to publish 'Ghost Photos'.

Originally posted by ferretman2
And as far as the source is concerned....the WSJ or NYT are not going to publish 'Ghost Photos'.

Very true, but when Pravda releases stories such as miners finding a hole to hell at the center of the Earth and releases audio of a bunch of screaming and wailing "souls." (Search on ATS it has been discussed.) I find they should stick to reporting on domestic and international events and leave out any random sensational story that crosses the "news of the bizzare" desk. I think Pravda is having a rough time of getting use to its people having other media outlets besides the state.

Link is broken. Takes me to the homepage for some news site it looks like.