It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Himalayan
How, are you expecting Han chinese to respect tibetan if they always do things like boycotting Beijing Olympic? That will only harm the relationship, and bring more tragic.
- I know some Han Chinese do have respect for us Tibetans because i've met many in my life.
- What about all the violent demonstration against Japan? Your people fought for their and your freedom from The Japanese and still are figting because of what Japan is doing, Rewriting history by stating that their War crimes are exaturarted and not true. Now are you and others going to listen to Japans view on what happened in NANJING?
- Your people are still fighting, does that means anything to you?
Originally posted by warset
WW2 has not being exaturated
there is a world of difference between what china vs japan and china vs tibet
1) politically speaking:
-Tibet is a part of china, therefore, any harm done to china will harm tibet (unless you want to free tibet from china, which is unrealistic)
-japan and china are not one country, putting up protests unite people, and actually helps the country's development. This is pretty much like saying the US is trying to contain china, which helps the US.
2) historically speaking:
-what happened in tibet is totally from what happen in WW2 japan vs china.
-what happened in tibet is more like what happened to native indian after the arrival of European.
-sino-japan war was more like german-jews holocaust.
20000000+ chinese ppl were killed during the sino-japanese war, and the Nanjing slaughtering alone resulted in 300000+ civilians killed in 3 days from the japanese army's human slaughtering contest game.
here are some photos taken back then
The biggest point I want to point out is that when china make protest against japan, it actually helps china, where as tibetans' protest against china harms tibet.
Another comparison, when americans try to isolate china, it helps americans. But if the US-living-tibetans try to isolate china, they isolate their own homeland.
get the point now?
Originally posted by warset
no, when china protest japan, it doesn't create peace, it makes more violence
same goes to tibet, when they protest, they deepens the hatred, and results in more violence.
and when they try to prevent china from growing, they prevent tibet from growing too.
this concept is totally different from the US trying to prevent china from growing.
US grows when china is not growing; Tibet doesn't grow when china is not growing.
this is an very easy to understand concept, why can't you get it?
War against other people create peace among you own group, war against your own group brings more sadness.
I suggest you to read George Orwell's "1984", it's one of the best ever created political novel. you'll then understand the world much better.
"War is peace; freedom is slavery; ignorant is strength." truest statement ever created in human history. Unfortunatly most ppl don't get it.
Originally posted by Himalayan
Originally posted by warset
no, when china protest japan, it doesn't create peace, it makes more violence
same goes to tibet, when they protest, they deepens the hatred, and results in more violence.
we do peaceful protest, that is the way we do it.
and when they try to prevent china from growing, they prevent tibet from growing too.
When China grows & Still commits Human Rights violation that is unacceptable.
this concept is totally different from the US trying to prevent china from growing.
US grows when china is not growing; Tibet doesn't grow when china is not growing.
this is an very easy to understand concept, why can't you get it?
When you say Tibet grows that only Benefits Han chinese in Tibet. The wealth is not trikling down to Tibetans like you are saying, your statement is incorrect.
Originally posted by warset
The biggest point I want to point out is that when china make protest against japan, it actually helps china, where as tibetans' protest against china harms tibet.
Originally posted by RetinoidReceptor
I think that kind of means Himalayan proved someone wrong when they say "alright you won". You know...the bs about Tibetan people being happy and all.
Wow so open minded. You said that killing, torturing, and cultural imperialism is not great. Geez I wish I was as open minded as YOU K4rupt!
And why is Tibet part of China? Why are Tibetans a minority now in their own country?
No we are bringing up what China has done and is still doing. You come on here and first try to air brush it, and now you say we are ignorant. Don't know how that works really...
I am not "hypocritical" because I never stook up for what my country is doing or has done that is bad or imperialistic. I actually condemn my country when it is wrong, even if it is my country unlike you. Oh nevermind you said what your country did in Tibet isn't "great".
I never wrote anything to smudge China's people, only China's government. Tata
K4rupt: Even the dalai lama has stated that Tibet NEEDS China and should stay with China. Alright?
-Tibet had serfs and master but as i stated earler
Hah, we were living fine untill China came in.
So you are saying that 150,000 Tibetans living in Exile are Aristrocrats?
Have you ever to Tibet, My people cherishes Buddhism and support our Monasterery, We love our lamas, that is what makes us.
It is a pure common sense that you don't ask an oppressor about the oppressed, you ask those who are oppressed.
In 1953, the greater part of the rural population---some 700,000 of an estimated total population of 1,250,000---were serfs. Tied to the land, they were allotted only a small parcel to grow their own food. Serfs and other peasants generally went without schooling or medical care. They spent most of their time laboring for the monasteries and individual high-ranking lamas, or for a secular aristocracy that numbered not more than 200 families. In effect, they were owned by their masters who told them what crops to grow and what animals to raise. They could not get married without the consent of their lord or lama. A serf might easily be separated from his family should the owner send him to work in a distant location. Serfs could be sold by their masters, or subjected to torture and death.
- My people are now minority in our own Land.
- My people now have no choice but to learn Chinese and try to fit in.
- China has and is systematically making my peoples identity useless and thus by doing so will erase our Identity in few generation if not stopped.
Status of the Tibetan Language
Sautman also sought to rebut charges by Tibetan exiles that the Tibetan language is devalued and being replaced by Chinese. "92-94% of ethnic Tibetans speak Tibetan. The only exception is places in Qinghai and Amdo where the Tibetan population is very small compared with the broader population. Instruction in primary school is pretty universally in Tibetan. Chinese is bilingual from secondary school onward. All middle schools in the TAR also teach Tibetan. In Lhasa there are about equal time given to Chinese, Tibetan, and English." In contrast, Soutman said, "Tibetan exile leaders in India used English as the sole language until 1994 and only became bilingual in 1994. Schools in Tibet promote the Tibetan language more than Indian schools do in ethnic Tibetan areas--in Ladakh, India, instruction is in Urdu, with a high dropout rate from Tibetans, but India is never accused of cultural genocide against Tibetans."
Chinese in tibet and tibetian cultral change
It is true, he said, that there have been significant inroads of Chinese culture into Tibet since the forcible takeover in 1959, but there has been an even greater influx of Western culture. "By not defining cultural genocide the Tibetan exiles can label any changes from 1959 as cultural genocide, although many of these changes could be expected to have occurred without the issue of cultural genocide arising."
The most common specific charges raised by Tibetan exiles, Sautman said, "point to Han immigration plus restrictive birth policies. In fact the state sponsored transfer to Tibet is on a small scale. From 1994 to 2001 the PRC organized only a few thousand people to go to Tibet as cadres. Most serve only 3 years and then return to China. Those who move on their own to the Tibet Autonomous Region usually return to China in a few years. They come for a while, find the cities of Tibet too expensive, and then return to China. Some of the 72,000 Chinese who maintain their hukou [household registration] in Tibet don't really live there. Pensions are higher if your household is registered in Tibet. These facts are supported by Australian and U.S. demographers. Claims of ethnic swamping in Tibet are misleading."
Originally posted by denythestatusquo
China looks like a big bad bully in this one.
Originally posted by chinawhite
China always looks like the big bad bully to you. I can reference other threads about your opinoin if you want
Originally posted by Nygdan
Guys, this thread isn't about your fellow ats posters, its about an incident in which the chinese military shot some tibets, trying to leave china. Lets stick strictly to the topic, and not one another.
Originally posted by k4rupt
At least China didn't invade a little oil-rich nation which led to the deaths of over 600,000 innocent Iraqis now did it? Oops, gave my little riddle away...
Now I'm not saying this did NOT happen, but
.....................