It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
www.911cultwatch.org.uk...
1) Rigid belief system
The claim 9/11 can only be properly understood from within the group's mindset--assertions about explosives pre-placed inside the WTC, US government complicity, the Pentagon being hit by a missile rather than a plane on 9/11--these tenets and similar are integral core beliefs. It is not permissible, within the cult, to question such--doing so immediately excludes the person.
2) Intense activism/aggressive proselytising
Not an exclusive characteristic, patently. However, the messianic and intolerant zeal displayed does make these people stand out somewhat. A nasty variant of the aggression was the practised spook tactic (unsuccessfully) employed by Machon at the 2005 Anarchist Book Fair of trying to goad--by posture/insulting language--opponents into violence so she could play 'victim'.
3) Advancing non-falsifiable propositions
In vernacular language, there is no amount of evidence that can shake these people in their beliefs--and despite claims they seek 'truth', they want nothing of the sort--merely one-sided information that bolsters their conclusions (premises). As one incisive (US) source of comment stated "no evidence, of any kind, has been found that gives any evidence that the government planned or organised these conspiracies. No documents have been found...Nobody involved in these alleged conspiracies has stepped forward". To the cult believer, this mundane statement is intrinsically ludicrous, if not malevolent. We disagree, but concur with remarks by US commentator Bill Weinberg that "the endemic sloppiness of the self-styled 'researchers' is delegitimising the entire project of critiquing the 'official version'. The ostentatiously named 'Truth movement' is not clearing the air, but muddying the water". That may well be the idea, of course, in some quarters. Fundamentally though, the fact that 'anything goes' and the most elementary rules of evidence do not apply in the cult's discourse is disturbing, to put it mildly.
Originally posted by SkipShipman
1.) Cults have one leader who gets all allegiance. 911 truth seekers have no "leader," but seek the truth independently on their own. By the way science progresses when independent laboratory observations and results prove things. Science cannot progress when a dictator tells us what science is. So who is the "cult?" There is no "rigid belief system," when people look with their own eyes, so what is to "believe?"
2.) Our government spent more than a billion dollars to have people write blogs, proselytising with force of dollars very much more than 911 truth seekers who pay out of pocket a great deal of the time.
3.) Government lies daily and the pot is calling the kettle black here when it says there is "no evidence." There is enough circumstantial evidence here to query and to speculate. Just because we do not have their exact plans does not make any difference. The US government should show the evidence why for example building 7 collapsed, while other buildings are left standing.
Conclusion: IMHO this "cult watch," thing applies to the government, not to independent truth seekers. As usual "follow the money." The proposition is another red herring, a weak argument, that defends nothing and attempts a very sly name calling and a group paint brush version of ad hominem attacks.
Originally posted by Seekerof
One pressing and important fact must have alluded you when you wrote the above rhetoric, SkipShipman? The above link is a UK based link that is mainly aimed at debunking and "targeting" UK and Irish 9/11 and 7/7 so-called and self-proclaimed "truth seekers." Been to the site and read the commentaries, yet?
The waters will be muddied because it is the only logical course of action.
Supressed evidence means all we can do is attack and punch holes in the official story.
Get the evidence that was destroyed and supressed and the focus/#/actions will change.
2) Intense activism/aggressive proselytising
Originally posted by doctorfungi
You don't just 'attack' and 'punch holes in' a story... you step back and logically look at it from BOTH sides.
Originally posted by Mr Spock
I worked on the 97th floor of tower 2 (southeast tower) until 9/11/01. I was there on Sunday, 9/9/01 when the electricians were upgrading power to equipment in our data center. There were no explosives.
Originally posted by Mr Spock
...you can watch how after years of experience, and many hours spent checking and rechecking every wire connector and detail before throwing the switch, the team is all on edge that everything will work as expected. Now, imagine dousing the job they just did in jet fuel and letting it burn for an hour or so, thinking about things like plastic wire insulation burning off the copper wires that lead to the explosive charges. You can pretty quickly realize how ridiculous the whole thing is.
My advice: Go chase Bigfoot. There is at least a chance that a large primate has yet to be officially discovered, and you would look less foolish.
And to bring Illuminati into this? Holy Mama! He stayed with a nice Illuminati family... (sheesh!) seemed terrified to talk about it... (yet will risk it all to pass on some unsupportable info to you)
Originally posted by bsbray11
What I'm wondering is how long he stood over the shoulders of the guys doing the work to watch exactly what they were doing, and at what point they became annoyed with him.
I'm not saying they were planting explosives, or hooking up/activating detonators or whatever, necessarily, but the fact that people were around is no great shock. I just wonder how one can make such concrete statements unless they were up in the faces of those doing the actual work.
[edit on 23-10-2006 by bsbray11]
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
I cannot watch the buildings fall and believe that it was solely the planes impact that felled them.
The towers do not fall,they literally turn to dust.
The cores disappear.
The documented lakes of molten metal do not fit the official story.
Suspicious activity,power downs,and reports of whole floors closed off in the weeks before the disaster do not help the official story.
The links between the terrorists and the US inteligence agencies do not help
the official story.
WTC 7,a case in itself,does not fit in with the official story.
The testament of William Rodriguez,and others also does not back up the official story.
Many police and firemen in NY do not believe in the official story.
The US government has tailored the details of 911 over and over,to suit their story.
Bush even spoke of bombs placed in the buildings by AQ recently.
The CIA actually created,funded,supplied and trained "Al Qaeda."
False flag type attacks have occurred throughout history.FACT.
The official story is Baloney.
And i don`t even frequent "pro 911 truth" websites.I have maybe 4 or 5 times.
With the chain reaction that has followed 911,is it not becoming clear to people what really happened?
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
I cannot watch the buildings fall and believe that it was solely the planes impact that felled them.
The towers do not fall,they literally turn to dust.
The cores disappear.
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
The documented lakes of molten metal do not fit the official story.
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
Suspicious activity,power downs,and reports of whole floors closed off in the weeks before the disaster do not help the official story.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
I cannot watch the buildings fall and believe that it was solely the planes impact that felled them.
The towers do not fall,they literally turn to dust.
The cores disappear.
Take a few engineering classes and you will be able to figure it out.
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
The documented lakes of molten metal do not fit the official story.
I haven't seen any documentation on the "lakes of molten metal". All I have heard is theories and conjecture.
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
Suspicious activity,power downs,and reports of whole floors closed off in the weeks before the disaster do not help the official story.
I do know why some of the floors were closed off. They were being renovated. The company I worked for at the time had the lighting contract for the renovations. They were also renovating an area between the towers called Zig Zag Alley. I designed the lighting fixtures for it.