posted on Nov, 10 2003 @ 01:22 PM
I believe that we did go to the moon, and did send the Apollo space missions there. However, I also believe that only one or two of the missions were
faked. Why would they have to fake all of them? It would make sense to hoax a few because they were under bidget constraints and needed more missions
to make themselves look credible and techonologically advanced.
There are some interesting aspects of the various tapes and images that have been supposedly taken on the moon that my be questionable, such as the
shadows, and atmospheric conditions, but remember that the mon is a alien atmosphere that has only been contacted by a few dozen men (assuming that
there isn't a whole colony of humans living up there
I don't understand why we're not ocnsidering spending money to go to the moon again. I know it's been considered by Bush, but he really should get
some R&D going onit. I mean, it's a much better endeavor to invest on than to conquer "a-rock" in a middle of a war torn desert. We are much much
more techonologically advanced than decades ago, so there's no excuse about "safety issues". Of course, this is all assuming the conspiracy
theories arent true and there are no other humans living up there.
By the way, have any of you seen this footage? I'm a bit skeptical of it, since it's very possible that it could have been fabricated itself, but an
interesting tidbit otherwise.