It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Originally posted by orangetom1999
Have any of you people actually heard sonar operating from a submarine. I dont mean in movies ..I mean actually heard the real thing?? Active sonar??
Think long and hard on this one.
Orangetom
Yes I have. I've heard the active sonar from a Los Angelas class attack sub, by way of the dipped sonar transducer in an SH-3H Sea King helicopter. One thing that you need to consider about active sonar. Active sonar in shallow water is almost usless unless it is used at short range in a directed beam. The frequency of the sonar also needs to vary between pulses.
Ever hear of a "convergence zone"? You get a convergence zone where sound energy that is reflected off of both the surface and bottom converges. Think of it like a pair of sine waves exactly 180 degrees off from each other. Where they converge is the convergence zone. If a target is in the zone it can be detected at a greater distance. The problem with shallow water is that there are too many convergence zones too close together and this creates interference.
I could go into more detail but I'm not sure what is and is not classified these days. I got out of ASW 19 years ago. Nothing that I have mentioned here hasn't already been published in Popular Science or by Tom Clancy. By the way I remember when Clancy was investigated by the Navy for information in "The Hunt For Red October". One of the pilots in my squadron went to High School with him and was questioned by NIS.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
What do you make of Akulas in the Indian Ocean Darksided? (presuming you're Australian)
Because the Agosta 90B PN subs are rumored to have AIP and I doubt the IN Scorpenes are going to have the same.
The AIP subs(probably 1 and maybe 3) will pose a major threat for the IN surface fleet.
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
what would be the best defense against these littoral diesel subs.
Originally posted by st3ve_o
how do the british 'astute class' subs compare when they enter service??
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
I have a Yes or No question for both Orangetom and Jim. Please tell me that the US navy is not sitting on their keasters and letting themselves slip behind in naval technology and weapon systems.
So my question is this. Yes or No from your knowledge, is the US navy working on or posses any kind of new technology that can counter this sort of threat or anything really cool that would definantly put us back in the naval lead if we ever were. You don't have to go into detail or comprimise yourself or any oaths you have taken. Although ya can if ya want to. Or point me in the right direction if you can. I just need a yes or no answer so that I can keep my faith in the US Navy, or should I start rooting for the Indian navy instead.
Originally posted by paperplane_uk
Originally posted by st3ve_o
how do the british 'astute class' subs compare when they enter service??
Although any direct comparison is highly classified. It is well known that british subs have a good reputation for being quiet and there is little reason to suggest that they will not be at similar noise levels to the viginia class (i think seawolf class type levels might be pushing it for the uk at the moment). It has been stated on this board before that certain people in the US navy base in Scotland used to joke that all uk subs ever did was drive out the clyde and then sit on the bottom, because they used to just dissappear!
AIP tech is a major area of research in many countries and the pace of development is huge. So while the nuclear boats beat out the AIP ones currently on endurance and speed, this may not always be the case.
It is well worth keeping an eye on this subject area.
Paperplane_uk
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
I have a Yes or No question for both Orangetom and Jim. Please tell me that the US navy is not sitting on their keasters and letting themselves slip behind in naval technology and weapon systems.
So my question is this. Yes or No from your knowledge, is the US navy working on or posses any kind of new technology that can counter this sort of threat or anything really cool that would definantly put us back in the naval lead if we ever were. You don't have to go into detail or comprimise yourself or any oaths you have taken. Although ya can if ya want to. Or point me in the right direction if you can. I just need a yes or no answer so that I can keep my faith in the US Navy, or should I start rooting for the Indian navy instead.
Originally posted by JIMC5499
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
I have a Yes or No question for both Orangetom and Jim. Please tell me that the US navy is not sitting on their keasters and letting themselves slip behind in naval technology and weapon systems.
So my question is this. Yes or No from your knowledge, is the US navy working on or posses any kind of new technology that can counter this sort of threat or anything really cool that would definantly put us back in the naval lead if we ever were. You don't have to go into detail or comprimise yourself or any oaths you have taken. Although ya can if ya want to. Or point me in the right direction if you can. I just need a yes or no answer so that I can keep my faith in the US Navy, or should I start rooting for the Indian navy instead.
I'm still trying to figure out if these subs are the threat they are being made out to be. The only advantage that they have is their ability to go totally silent for several hours. They have a short range, limited speed endurence, and from what I understand, short deployment times.
With these limitations in mind it should be fairly easy to eliminate them as a threat. Everybody keeps focusing on the subs themselves and forgets the big picture. If you can't kill the sub, kill it's support structure.
This AIP system needs specialized fuel and support systems to sustain itself. This requires the sub to either return to port or meet with a tender. If you destroy the support facilities or sink the tenders, the sub is going to have a rough time. Nuclear subs have their problems but this isn't one of them. All that is needed to support them is a cargo ship with a small crane. I have seen where an attack sub has been tied between two surface ships for replentishment.
The CAPTOR mine is alive and well. They can be placed where and when they are needed. It would be kind of interesting to seed a harbor with CAPTORs after the subs have left it. One thing worth mentioning is that with the new rotary launcher a B-2 can deploy CAPTORs.
Originally posted by BASSPLYR
Still gotta ask any clues as to why we don't use active sonar. I know the obvious reason, but I'm willing to bet there is another reason that is probably simple but not commonly thought about. Maybe Giant Squid don't like it and neither do whales they've gone crazy and are attacking anything that uses active sonar. JK again.
Originally posted by defcon5
Yeah we got owned alright…
HMS Gotland
050627-N-0685S-003 San Diego, Ca. (June 27, 2005) – The Swedish diesel-powered attack submarine HMS Gotland arrives in San Diego on a transport ship from Sweden.
It looks to me like they are too small to cross the ocean by themselves.