posted on Oct, 19 2006 @ 02:16 AM
I've been having discussions with my friends about the topic of free will. The example is this, let's say that your in a lunchline, and you can
have a choice between an apple or chocolate cake, and you choose the chocolate cake, but why did you choose the cake? We all know what it is
to "do" something, we know by "doing" it, but is this enough for free will? When in line, at that exact moment, you could choose either
the cake or apple, and you chose the cake, we can look at this in two ways that I don't think support free will; A-You don't really have any
"reason" you can clearly say why you chose the cake, so how was that "your" doing? B-At that point you knew that cake would taste better to you
at that moment, you knew the chemical responses on your tounge would be more enjoyable than the apple, so with that said, does that mean that we are
just controlled by what we feel will be more pleasurable at that time? You could also propose the argument that disagrees with free will called
causation. Causation is the thought that everything you do, all your "choices" are because something caused you to react a certain way, or choose
something. For example, lets say that you haven't had cake in a long time, and seeing that cake reminded you that you haven't had cake in a while,
therefore you not having cake caused you to choose cake, again, so how is that free will? Another example, I am a car buff, why am I a car buff,
because my dad is. I have brothers that aren't car buffs, so something in their past had to cause them to not to like cars, but something in my past
caused me to like cars. I washed my car today, why did I, because it rained yesterday, the rain caused me to want to wash my car. I would like
someone to shed some light on this subject for me, I didn't really know what section to post this in, so I "choose" lol, this one. Appreciate some
feedback, thanks