Violence in Iraq could end "within months" if Iran and Syria joined efforts to stabilise the country, says Iraqi President Jalal Talabani.
Thats a pretty bold statement from the IRAQI PM.
Will the US go for it?
I imagine a large portion of the violence is coming from Iran..
Surely the options for IRAQ are becoming limited, quickly.
The USA are going to have to make some BOLD choices on how to handle the crisis that turned into all out anarchy.
Surely, Israel WONT Allow for us to of removed a anti israeli country, only to replce it with 2 OTHER anti israeli countries.
but then again, israels feelsing shouldnt be considered being its American troops dying on the ground...
Sadly though, this will be the outcome.
Iran has entered Iraq already,
The USA is in a serious problem here.
If we move on Irans nuclear issue, Iraq effectivley becomes part of the iranian state.
If we allow the IRAQI PM to move on his idea to include Iran and Syria, we effectivley created a worse situation in the region, than what saddam
being its the IRAQI government supposidly asking us to stay, can they too ask us to leave? to be replaced by the only countries who have the ability
to put a hold on this problem?
[edit on 17-10-2006 by Agit8dChop]