It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shadowflux
It may look sort of like a head but in all actuality it doesn't look anything like one. To begin with, if there was an android head on the moon NASA would've noticed it....
However, the one thing that he does say that I find absolutely correct is that it is to the eternal shame of late 20th and 21st man that we haven't been back to the Moon or already put men on Mars.
Originally posted by johnlear
Take a few moments and ponder this thought: "I wonder what I don't know?"
Originally posted by crgintx
However, the one thing that he does say that I find absolutely correct is that it is to the eternal shame of late 20th and 21st man that we haven't been back to the Moon or already put men on Mars. We've had the basic technology to go there since the late '60's. We had working space based nuclear reactors and ion propulsion systems since the 70's.
Originally posted by johnlear
Originally posted by crgintx
However, the one thing that he does say that I find absolutely correct is that it is to the eternal shame of late 20th and 21st man that we haven't been back to the Moon or already put men on Mars.
On what do you base this claim? Do you honestly think that if we were going to the moon and Mars on a daily basis, and have been doing so for a very long time, that that information would be made public? Let me respectfully suggest that is an incredibly naive point of view. The public doesn't even know most of the advanced aircraft produced in the past 20 years. They know about the F-117 the B-1 the F-22. They don't know about the real stuff. Take a few moments and ponder this thought: "I wonder what I don't know?"
.
On what do you base this claim? Do you honestly think that if we were going to the moon and Mars on a daily basis, and have been doing so for a very long time, that that information would be made public? Let me respectfully suggest that is an incredibly naive point of view. The public doesn't even know most of the advanced aircraft produced in the past 20 years. They know about the F-117 the B-1 the F-22. They don't know about the real stuff. Take a few moments and ponder this thought: "I wonder what I don't know?"
Originally posted by johnlear
The reason you don't see stars in NASA's pictures taken on the moon is that the daytime color of the sky is not black. The refraction through the moon's atmosphere turns the color of the sky black to...maybe blue...maybe red.....maybe yellow...but its certainly not black IMHO. I like to think of the moons skys as a pale yellow, which I think it is. Of course I don't have any proof yet! But before you start blasting me just take a minute and imagine what you don't know. Then, of course, blast away.
How come during solar eclipses we don't see the moon's atmosphere refracting sun's light at the limb?
Originally posted by johnlear
The public doesn't even know most of the advanced aircraft produced in the past 20 years. They know about the F-117 the B-1 the F-22. They don't know about the real stuff. Take a few moments and ponder this thought: "I wonder what I don't know?"
Ok. But my simple brain wants to ask, if it's true then why aren't these aircraft being used? They haven't in Iraq. Not in Afghanistan. Not anywhere we know of. What are they being used for?
So why are they being made? Is it in preparation for a coming war against the 'aliens'? If yes, then do we have a hope in hell to win a battle against a far more technologically advanced race? We'll be smothered to pulp! (That's if aliens are a reality!!)
Darn! It's getting curiouser and curiouser!