It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by shots
Originally posted by Vitchilo
And those who say that she helped a terrorist, read the brillant grimpreaper's analysis.
Grimereaper based his analysis on an Op/Ed/comment section of the website and not hard reported facts. Hardly what I would call a good source even if it did contain relevant info it was still just an opinion.
The Nation
comment | posted February 17, 2005 (March 7, 2005 issue)
The Lynne Stewart Trial
[edit on 10/16/2006 by shots]
Originally posted by djohnsto77
@shaunybaby:
Everything you said is true, but I'm at a loss as to what it has to with the this story. Lawyers have the right to speak with their clients while jailed, but they don't have a right to pass messages from jailed people back and forth from their criminal organizations.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
She got 28 months for aiding and abetting a terrorist.
Is that too much?
This thread started out with many assuming the worst and leveling all sorts of claims against the administration and American justice.
Do any of the apologist think she didn't get a fair sentence?
Stewart...was convicted in 2005 of providing material support to terrorists.
You have voted grimreaper797 for the Way Above Top Secret award. You have used all of your votes for this month.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
This is the article that I read:
NYC civil rights lawyer gets prison for helping terrorists
Stewart...was convicted in 2005 of providing material support to terrorists.
I won't haggle over semantics.
Is 28 months too much for "providing material support to terrorists?"
[edit on 2006/10/16 by GradyPhilpott]
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I'm not sure why you insist on bringing up the White House in this discussion. The issue is not the administration, but the sentence received by this convicted felon. Whatever the perceived sins of the administration, is the sentence of 28 months for providing material support to terrorists too severe, especially when the maximum sentence could have been thirty years?
Originally posted by crgintx
here's my beef with her actions: could this action lead to further act of terrorism anywhere by followers of the Shiek? The answer is yes.
She should be put in a room every day for 18 hours a day with a TV playing videos or displaying pictures of the victims of those terrorist crimes she furthered for the next 28 months. No newspapers, radio, books, mail from friends or family.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
She should be put in a room every day for 18 hours a day with a TV playing videos or displaying pictures of the victims of those terrorist crimes she furthered for the next 28 months. No newspapers, radio, books, mail from friends or family.
Sorry, but i find it disgusting, this is torture. Who are you to order torture against someone who done nothing to help terrorists?