Report Chemtrails., page 1

Excellent information!

I can see that there are still individuals like Howard, Essan and Nygdan who endeavor, ineffectively, to act as the voice of reason by inserting posts that don't further their argument, but instead simply repeat a contradictory position. Simply posting one-line, sometimes insulting posts have undermined the questionable intentions of the waning anti-chemtrail demographic. What is gained by making insulting, substanceless statements? It's simply antagonistic.

I understand that one may speak out against a subject and people that some might consider alarmist; if for nothing but to prevent incorrect, misleading, or false information unnecessarily alarming the public. But the majority of the people concerned about this subject are sincere, and their numbers are quickly growing. One has to ask themselves why.

The amount of supportive information, expert, professional witnesses, physical, scientific proof, and the growing general consensus is mounting against the anti, or non-chemtrail believers to the point that your diminutive, meaningless posts are in danger of becoming wiped from the field of this argument for good. Personal opinion, insults, and a failure to address the specific issues being considered only show the unassailability of the facts, and the growing support of the reality of this phenomena.

And call them chemtrails, contrails, or feul dumping, the behavior of the emissions of these aircraft is making people around the world take notice and become very, very concerned. If there is nothing to this, and these are regular contrails that have been around for decades, why are people by the thousands growing concerned about something as mundane and familiar as commercial aircraft engine condensation?

The people that are arguing against the chemtrail position keep repeating the process of how condensation is formed. Yes, we've heard you. Chemtrails and contrails look the same - which is why people who are against the chemtrail theory have repeated the condensation process until they're blue in the face.

Chemtrail spraying most likely shares, or exploits this process, because the streams would mimic and be virtually identical to regular contrails. This would allow the deviant public entity to spray over any heavily populated area seemingly without notice. If they were asked about the new, different contrails, they could respond, as officials have already done, by again repeating the process that forms contrails.

Thank you for the high school lesson in water moisture. Now let us, the concerned citizens, show you how your "contrails" affect the weather in dangerous, unnatural ways, sicken people, effect drought, harm livestock, rain weblike fibrous materials onto the ground, contaminating food and water supplies, then follow that up with a quick lesson on the legalities of experimenting with chemicals over a human population without regard for health statutes, or human life.

Does our U.S. government or military now, or have they ever shown concern for U.S. law, human rights, or the value of a human life without the forceful legal direction, or outcry of the ACLU, FDA, NAACP? I suggest not. And I further suggest that if you don't admit to, or if you deny a program exists (kind of like ufos, despite moutains of documentation proving the contrary), then there doesn't appear to be anything to be held accountable for.

Machiavelli said it best in The Art of War, "No enterprise is more likely to succeed
than one concealed from the enemy until it is ripe for execution." He'd have a lot to say about our current government...