It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Strangest UFO Pics TAken Today

page: 3
2
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 08:00 AM
link   

Originally posted by Marlborough Red
Interesting pics but the fact that there are no clouds or anything else in the background make it impossible to gain any perspective or guage size.
This could quite easily be a large deflating helium balloon at height.

MR

I am in Melbourne, Australia, and it's really hot down here for this time of the year. Got to almost 35 degrees down here, and there wasn't a cloud in the sky! I doubt theres any other country other than Australia where that happens!




posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 08:07 AM
link   
Cyrax, Instead of downing you, I'd like to say thanks a lot for the contribution. Cool pics &info of when/where/etc.

Hard to say what that thing is....very strange, I saw something almost similar when I was a little kid near a landfill, I even called that Dr. Rule guy to report it haha, (I was a little kid).

Anyway, thanks again.



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 08:31 AM
link   
thanks Ibelieve2006
once i get my friend to have a look i will post what he says he will get the pics in better quality then they are now
Pistonzor finally we are not arguing thanks for the reply



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 08:43 AM
link   
Is this a face? Sorry you can't see it well but if you look at the pic on thread pg2 you will see what I am talking about. Is this the head another poster mentioned earlier?





posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 09:10 AM
link   

Pistonzor finally we are not arguing thanks for the reply

Haha yeah
Don't take anything I say personal or anything, cause it's always what I think at the time of post. You know; mood swings.



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 11:38 AM
link   
Working on them, the posted photos, now.

Saw the contraption in the image post, if its a levitating craft perhaps
they, the ownwer(s) of the ufos, are attaching or carrying objects for
a space platform.

The physics of levitation is not like rocket science, so throw out the book.

The they or owners of ufos I refer to reading about the Illuminati, I use the
symbol Ill*, since they are unknown and so are the craft and technology.
If they payed for they own it, so guess only they, Ill*, can answer our
questions.

Check back later, Best.



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 11:44 AM
link   
Can we just stop posting this garbage. I am tired of the blurry inferior pictures that are suppose to be the evidence of alien life. Go get a real camera, real lenses, and shoot the object again then lets see what's alien and whats not. As many professional photographers that are out there in this world that carry high end equipment around all the time you would think we could get better images of these so called UFO's. Stop the speculation, stop the well it looks like.... I'll tell you what it looks like. It looks like a picture taken by someone that doesn't have the proper equipment to record the image. The argument may stand for 1950's pictures, but with the technology and recording abilities we have available to use today there is just no excuse for poor speculative images. Where are the better images? We have millions of more people taking pictures than 50 years ago why do we continue getting the same crap? Show me real proof, Show me something conclusive, stop showing me out of focus, pixalated, water droplets, etc etc



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 11:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by jbondo
Is this a face? Sorry you can't see it well but if you look at the pic on thread pg2 you will see what I am talking about. Is this the head another poster mentioned earlier?




Face, Come on guys. This is nothing more than Jpeg fragments that resembles a face. It is truely amazing how much garbage is generated from an image that is blown up 1000 times its original size totally distorting the original. There is no credibility left in an image when it is blown up to this scale. Do some reading on the algorithms used to enlarge and compress pixel data and you will see what I'm talking about.



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 11:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by photobug
Can we just stop posting this garbage. I am tired of the blurry inferior pictures that are suppose to be the evidence of alien life. Go get a real camera, real lenses, and shoot the object again then lets see what's alien and whats not. As many professional photographers that are out there in this world that carry high end equipment around all the time you would think we could get better images of these so called UFO's. Stop the speculation, stop the well it looks like.... I'll tell you what it looks like. It looks like a picture taken by someone that doesn't have the proper equipment to record the image. The argument may stand for 1950's pictures, but with the technology and recording abilities we have available to use today there is just no excuse for poor speculative images. Where are the better images? We have millions of more people taking pictures than 50 years ago why do we continue getting the same crap? Show me real proof, Show me something conclusive, stop showing me out of focus, pixalated, water droplets, etc etc


I'm sure if high quality camera equipment didn't cost around $1000 or more in some cases we would all have it. When something is that high in the air i'm sure that is going to be tough to get a quality shot of it, it's like taking a picture of a jet flying over when you're on the ground (except in this case the object was stationary). I myself have never seen a high quality image of a jet taken from the ground, unless it was flying over really low for an airshow or something. If anybody could prove me wrong with a good picture of a jet high in the sky taken from the ground, I would love to see one.



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 11:58 AM
link   
What is that?!

Weirdest UFO I’ve ever seen, it looks balloon-ish though. Like something on a tether that has other things attached to it.

Some of the other pictures of it look completely different though…possibly it from different angles? Was it rotating when it moved?


[edit on 10/12/2006 by Kacen]



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 12:12 PM
link   
Picture of a military jet. Not sure about the altitude but was taken with a 1000 mm lens the film equivilent of a 1500mm lens. On the ground it appeared as a small dot. With an inferior camera it eould appear as a blur or perhaps a ufo with a face on it.




posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 12:14 PM
link   
I see 3 possibilitys here of the top of my head no doubt theres more but with bad blurry pictures we will never know anyway.

1. A deflating mylar baloon
2. A plastic bag
3. A kite

Take your pick.



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 12:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by photobug
Can we just stop posting this garbage. I am tired of the blurry inferior pictures that are suppose to be the evidence of alien life. Go get a real camera, real lenses, and shoot the object again then lets see what's alien and whats not. As many professional photographers that are out there in this world that carry high end equipment around all the time you would think we could get better images of these so called UFO's. Stop the speculation, stop the well it looks like.... I'll tell you what it looks like. It looks like a picture taken by someone that doesn't have the proper equipment to record the image. The argument may stand for 1950's pictures, but with the technology and recording abilities we have available to use today there is just no excuse for poor speculative images. Where are the better images? We have millions of more people taking pictures than 50 years ago why do we continue getting the same crap? Show me real proof, Show me something conclusive, stop showing me out of focus, pixalated, water droplets, etc etc



Are you serious! All CYRAX is doing is trying to contribute!! Hes not trying to PROVE ANYTHING! Hes catching unusual objects, not claiming them to be Alien. Why dont you buy him some high end eguipment?? Did he ever claim to be a pro-photographer!! You dont like it, STOP reading his posts. You have nothing to contribute.



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 12:26 PM
link   
It looks like my hair dryer... which is conspicuously missing from my bathroom.



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 12:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by Human Defense
Blue Beam technology. Thanx for the up close look at the soon coming staged alien invasion by the illuminati.


No offense to CYRAX. But to belive an alien invasion from a blurry picture blown up 1000% is a little crazy. And another poster thinking the aliens put their face on the craft so we would know what they look like..... I have no problems asking for comments about an image or even possibilities, but I do have a problem with people distorting reality to fit their beliefs. The reality of this picture is that there is no way of telling what it is becuase of the technical shortcomings of CYRAX equipment.



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 01:10 PM
link   
Great pics Cyrax! And for those who are saying that your photo's could be better -- ignore them; we can all see very clearly what this "thing" looks like.
I'm very intrigued by these photo's and will be interested in finding out if anyone can find some other ufo's that are similar to what's in your photo's.



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 01:21 PM
link   
photobug,

I was just asking a question. I have no photo skills to speak of so give me a break!

I said to go look at the previous same pic in another early post to get a better idea of what I was talking about. I said pg2 but I think it's pg1 of this thread.

I have no idea what the thing is and don't claim to know anything about it. It could be a kids radio controlled plane for all I know.



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 01:21 PM
link   
I've seen something similar! At first I thought it was nothing but now i'm considering the possibility.

well, similar in the far away pictures. I was driving north of lake ontario, near scugog and I saw something that looked like that, had no speed, and i'm pretty sure disspeared when I looked back about the 3rd time.


I mean it could be a balloon or something. But i'm just entertaining the possibility it could have been sometthing else. Anyways, I think i've seen the same thing.

From one of the pictures it looks kinda like a big long flimsy winged plane, like that wierd prototype solar powered one. But that doesnt explain the round objects on each end. Unless they are just engines?

I dont know. But heres a picture of what i'm talking about:

Picture 1
Picture 2

Who knows, draw your own conclusions. Its still weird, and neat. Nice pictures



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 01:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by jbondo
photobug,

I was just asking a question. I have no photo skills to speak of so give me a break!

I said to go look at the previous same pic in another early post to get a better idea of what I was talking about. I said pg2 but I think it's pg1 of this thread.

I have no idea what the thing is and don't claim to know anything about it. It could be a kids radio controlled plane for all I know.


No offense to you either sir. I'm just tired of all the alien theories based on non-facts and blurry images. I am however intriqued by the Blue Stream theory purported by the NWO, I have no eveidence to back this up, But am actively seeking it. Does anyone have any information on this they can share?



posted on Oct, 12 2006 @ 01:31 PM
link   
Without a bit more descriptive evidence/observation reporting my vote, as it stands "today":

*uncontrolled inflatable object (balloon, plastic bag, etc, perhaps made to look 'unusual/unidentifiable');
*kite or other controlled aerial object, poorly recorded;
*object thrown or dropped from aircraft;

it may even be a piece of trash carried aloft by wind/updraft. I wish it WAS a ufo... actually - that's exactly what it is: "unidentified" perhaps, though 'flying' may be a stretch at this point...

Can we get more data?? e.g., which direction was it going, altitude estimate, total time aloft, trajectory, orientaion changes, other witnesses, repeat sightings, etc. There's just not enough information here. If it's any consolation 0 yes, I see a "face" as well - so what?

Anyway - thanks for posting and keep up the inquisiteveness and conjecture:it's healthy! And keep looking up!



new topics

top topics



 
2
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join