655,000 Iraqis killed since start of war, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 11-10-2006 @ 10:57 AM by Astygia
Originally posted by Vitchilo
We have one, thats why nobody needs to bring one.


You're kidding? A democracy in the USA? More an illusion of democracy. Here's a few key words why I don't think the USA is a democracy, not anymore: neo-cons, democrats, republicans, Bush, Clinton, Diebold, TV medias, Patriot Act, Military Comission Act, ect.. ect..

[edit on 11-10-2006 by Vitchilo]


Do you even know what a democracy is? It's a fancy word for "mob rule". And today's mob are the corporations, big money, etc.

The government is dirty. History shows us that it's always been dirty. And it's letting big money influence everything it does (Carlyle Group, Trilateral Commission, etc. )

But this isn't the matrix, and we're not all slaves. Our country doesn't put people to death for wanting to leave. The fact that we can trash our government without fear of reprisal is proof of democracy, even if it's a corrupt one. Try organizing an anti-Kim protest in North Korea, see what happens.

Further, this number, 655,000, is stupid. I have no doubt that the body count could be as high as, say, 200,000, and that's assuming a wide margin of error. If you read the entire article, you'll see they did a house-to-house poll to get this number.

Nobody forces Muslims to kill other Muslims. If they cared so much about protecting their fellow people from Americans, they would stop killing each other and remove our administration's reason to stay in Iraq. Eventually, enough people would call us out.

Putting a democracy in Iraq was an obfuscation to the lack of WMD, and frankly the very notion is a waste of time. We're taking one tribe out of power and putting a new one in its place. It's just gonna be a new pile of the same crap.


reply posted on 11-10-2006 @ 11:29 AM by Majic
That's Politics!

www.cnn.com...

The work updates an earlier Johns Hopkins study -- that one was released just before the November 2004 presidential election. At the time, the lead researcher, Les Roberts of Hopkins, said the timing was deliberate. Many of the same researchers were involved in the latest estimate.

This is obviously politically motivated.

The question I'm left with is who this effort is intended to benefit.

In light of how utterly self-discrediting it is, this seems more like a snare for credulous opponents of the Iraq War than a competent indictment of it.

These carefully-timed proclamations remind me of an earlier study with similar methodology.

But people are free to believe what they want to believe, and cases like this prove that beyond all doubt.



Related thread:

100,000 Innocent Iraqies Dead at the Hands of Bush (from ATSNN)


[edit on 10/11/2006 by Majic]


reply posted on 11-10-2006 @ 11:31 AM by DCP
On 10/29/04 from

www.michaelmoore.com...

Dr. Gilbert Burnham was on the team that states "an estimated 100,000 civilians have died in Iraq" and now he says it 600,000. Amazingly he releases these studies in October right before an election....things that make you go hmmmm
Pages: <<  1    2    3    4    5  >>    ^^TOP^^



ALL ATS`ers are terrorists
  Posted 5 days ago with 10 member flags
CNN Endorsing Terrorism
  Posted 8 days ago with 7 member flags
Obama\'s terror Drones.
  Posted 6 days ago with 6 member flags