posted on Oct, 9 2006 @ 11:28 PM
No one could blame Japan for re-thinking their depend on America current defense strategy, and now that I think of it, it was never their idea to
begin with it was forced on them as a concession of defeat. Japan could easilly increase defense expenditures and become millitarily potent without
wrecking thier economy. Unlike many wanna be powers, Japan has industrial capabillities, manpower, and scientific/research capabillities to be
formidable. Combine this with ancient martial traditions, and you have a potentially fearsome nation. If I were a Japanese millitary man, politician,
or hell, even voter; and realizing that my nations defense was dependent on a potent but currently pre-occupied ally, I'd demand rethinking current
defense policies.
I'm an ex army guy myself but i've read and heard from people who know better than me that great navies are as dependent on traditions as they are
technologies. I'm not exactly sure what this means, navy guys were always a little weird to me, but i do know that China is currently building a blue
water navy. They have little in the way of Naval experience and traditions, but gobs of cash and manpower, and the best tech that they can develop or
steal. A re-armed Japan would have the best naval tech that they could buy from the US or develop in house and quite a bit of Naval experience and
traditions to fall back on and would be a regional counter weight. I don't believe that China would like to see a new Japanese Imperial Navy(or
whatever it would be called)operating in the neighborhod.Unless China is playing a very sublime and calculated political game with thier biggest
trading partners and the rest of the world, they can't be happy about Kimbo's decision to test a weapon.