Bush was quick to link the DPRK into supplying Syria and Iran.
Questions - why has there be no attempts at interception of these transits of materials Bush speaks of?
Following the DPRK issue of its nuclear capability now.
This has gone on for 9 years the DPRK have been quite clear at the intention to achieve the bomb.
So - why was nothing done? Why have sanctions etc failed to allow continued supply of the goods and resource to build this capability?
9 years and more - and nothing has been done? So that begs the idea why has it been permitted
The US cannot attack the North now without risking Seoul being vapourised. Or is that what is being sought? A nuclear incident? A false flag perhaps
to promote the will for a 3rd world war to secure the remnants of the middle east?
North Korea however have something very effective to consider.
Let say the have anything from 5 to 25 warheads.
Its obvious they cant successfully launch against the US. They could hurt south korea.
But imagine - consider the global position of North Korea. Consider one missile hitting every major financial district of the major cities in the
Look at the stock market ripples caused by the ttrade centres dropping. Now consider entire financial districts. Consider what is in them. CEOs MDs,
databanks, records of ownership, contracts, legal documentation, insurance records, and above all money.
Just 5 of those areas being wasted in one day would cause a massive global knock on effect. Of course the DPRK would still lose and be hurt. But if
ever faced with this would you strike out small - or strike out big ?
The diplomatic tennis has began - Advantage DPRK