posted on Oct, 8 2006 @ 11:29 PM
Jef, think about what you said for one minute. If they have this, how are you to know they do not idneed provide sufficient energy to their people? Of
course their Autos are useless without petrol, but all their homes are easily linked to a network recieving energy from a Facility plant. Hmm lets
see, if they had no abiltiy or have not been suppliyng their own energy, I would assume they would not have been a threat for quite a long time now
Also if you look at NK on google Earth, you will see a big difference in their city infrastructure and just land than with cuba. This nation has large
skyscrapers all over all their major cities, yet we contiue to believe they are without energy and cannot feed their people? Those residential
skyscapers are full of people. And hmm if i am not mistaken, if that many people are going to lvie and support these cities, we would have to asume
they are eating decently.
We can see this is not the case in cuba where a large population are lliving in little rackety shanty towns. Of course being 90 miles away from your
iggest enemy does not help that situation any.
Everything we are told of North Korea is a lie, and this nuke test proves it. What third world nation with a majority starving population AND extreme
lack of energy has developed and now tested a nuclear weapon? Nope sorry India is and was a HIGHLY developed nation when they got theirs, and so was
Pakistan. Apparantley China and the Soviets too.
Cuba? Nope. Somalia (obviously) No. Afghanistan? Apparantley not. Iran is a developed nation with plenty of energy and a well-fed population. So that
is obvious why they are developing this technology.
There comes a point that you have to start actually looking at ALL the facts here and realising, they dont add up correctly. In fact, it almost seems
as if 2+2=5 ....