It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by conspiraciesabound
Under HR 6166, to be a lawful enemy (and thus have any rights at all) you must wear a MILITARY MARK....
2. Members of other militias and members of other volunteer corps, including those of organized resistance movements, belonging to a Party to the conflict and operating in or outside their own territory, even if this territory is occupied, provided that such militias or volunteer corps, including such organized resistance movements, fulfil the following conditions:
(a) That of being commanded by a person responsible for his subordinates;
(b) That of having a fixed distinctive sign recognizable at a distance;
(c) That of carrying arms openly;
(d) That of conducting their operations in accordance with the laws and customs of war.
Originally posted by SmallMindsBigIdeas
Are we saying that there is some sort of conspiracy in the numbering? The bills are numbered sequentailly ... so that would be the 6,166th bill introduced to the 109th Congress. If there were to be some sort of conspiracy in order for the bill to get this particular numbering system they would have had to had the text prepared in advance and waited for this number to become available.
Maybe I'm confused ... are you saying this is a conspiracy or just some sort of numerology coinicidence?