It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

14 more years of Bush rule in America.

page: 2
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 05:21 PM
link   
intrepid you made me go cold all over man when i read your post...


14 years of Bush power in the white house....

I cannot imagine the state of the world after another 14 years of that hate filled poison filled family in charge...

And as for a return of Bush 41, the japanese still remember him barfing at the banquet - a repeat invitation is not on the cards!! rofl




posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 06:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by intrepid
Well, we've got 2 more years with Dubya....


Silly me. Here I was thinking that Canada was a sovereign nation with it's own government, leaders, and football league.

You never know what know what you don't know.

[edit on 2006/10/6 by GradyPhilpott]



posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 07:03 PM
link   
As I said in the thread about Dubya trying to put off elections next time,

"Over my dead body"

Although, I'm sure they would have no problem trying to arrange that...



posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 10:13 PM
link   

Originally posted by GradyPhilpott

Originally posted by intrepid
Well, we've got 2 more years with Dubya....


Silly me. Here I was thinking that Canada was a sovereign nation with it's own government, leaders, and football league.

You never know what know what you don't know.

[edit on 2006/10/6 by GradyPhilpott]


Yup, I'd hope that Canada was a sovereign, but alas:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Then you find out that you have NO choice at all.


What do you think Grady? Maybe the RCMP are proceeding with covert ops in Sacramento without the knowledge of the federal gov't and the Terminator.

That being said, does more Bush mean less Canada? Maybe that's why other countries are concerned.
Self preservation.



posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 10:50 PM
link   
I would prefer it if the FBI followed protocol, but there doesn't seem to be much of an official reaction to the operations and I doubt that Bush personally has much to do with this problem. Whatever it is, I'm sure some agreement will be reached.


The inspector general's report documents 135 unapproved FBI crossings and says there is no sign the crossings will stop. Canadian officials say they have made no protest to the U.S. government about FBI agents operating without permission on Canadian soil.

ca.news.yahoo.com




[edit on 2006/10/6 by GradyPhilpott]



posted on Oct, 6 2006 @ 11:16 PM
link   

Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I would prefer it if the FBI followed protocol, but there doesn't seem to be much of an official reaction to the operations and I doubt that Bush personally has much to do with this problem. Whatever it is, I'm sure some agreement will be reached.


The inspector general's report documents 135 unapproved FBI crossings and says there is no sign the crossings will stop. Canadian officials say they have made no protest to the U.S. government about FBI agents operating without permission on Canadian soil.

ca.news.yahoo.com




[edit on 2006/10/6 by GradyPhilpott]


Our gov't is being oh so nice about this. I wonder if that's reciprical. Not likely. The spin continues. Remember the line that Russia gave THIS administration bad intel and that's why they went into Iraq? OK, next up, the Arar case. What does THIS administration have to say about that?


U.S. officials acted on incorrect information provided by the RCMP.


www.cbc.ca...

I've got to ask Grady, when is this administration going to take credit for ANYTHING that they do?

Will they take credit for sending a homeland force, like the RCMP or MI5, into another country to work, or it's OK because they got some bad intel from the Boy Scouts?

More Bush = less everything ieeo. I'll the you what "ieeo" is if you REALLY want me to.



new topics

top topics
 
0
<< 1   >>

log in

join